Month: November 2019

Home / Month: November 2019

Massa reveals toughest F1 team mates

November 26, 2019 | News | No Comments

Future retiree Felipe Massa says that Michael Schumacher and Fernando Alonso were his toughest team mates over the course of his 250-Grand Prix career.

Massa started made his F1 debut in 2002 with Sauber before joining Ferrari in 2006 and then Williams in 2014.

“Alonso always treated me well, we never had problems,” Massa said. “But he was always nicer in front of me than behind.”

The two men found themselves at odds recently following their spat in the US GP at Austin. But standing next to each on the Mexican GP grid during the national anthem, Alonso offered a  warm embrace to his former team mate and rival.

“He looked at me and he was awkward, and gave me hug. Then I looked at him and said, ‘You were a son of a bitch… but I like you.’ Then he started to laugh.”

Speaking of Schumacher, who Massa raced with for just one season in 2006, the Brazilian described his relationship with the seven-time world champion as that of a student and his master.

“He was a huge influence in my career and a really good friend. I visited him when he was sleeping. It was not an easy thing,” Massa revealed, referring to the German’s tragic skiing accident which occurred in 2013.

Needless to say, the Brazilian Grand Prix will be a very special weekend for Massa who will be racing in front of his home crowd for the very last time in Formula 1.

“Interlagos is home. It’s the place that I grew up. It will be emotional racing there for the final time on such an amazing track.

“I’m looking forward to enjoying every lap and hopefully I can manage to finish the race with a good result.

“I have won twice at Interlagos and have finished on the podium many times and I hope we can get another one. It won’t be easy, but I will do everything I can for my people and for Brazil.”

INTERVIEW: Fernando Alonso: Why F1 is no longer just for heroes

TECHNICAL: Under the skin of the Ferrari SF16-H

F1i Classic: Brazil 1991 – Senna’s pain and glory

FEATURE: Foul Play or Foul Language

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

A USS Liberty’s Hero’s Passing

November 26, 2019 | News | No Comments

Terry Halbardier, who – as a 23-year old seaman in 1967 – thwarted Israeli attempts to sink the USS Liberty, died on Aug. 11 in Visalia, California. It took the U.S. government 42 years after the attack to recognize Halbardier’s heroism by awarding him the Silver Star, a delay explained by Washington’s determination to downplay Israeli responsibility for the 34 Americans killed and the 174 wounded.

On June 8, 1967, during the Six-Day War, the Israeli military attacked the USS Liberty, an American spy ship which had been monitoring Israeli transmissions about the conflict. Intercepted Israeli communications indicated that the goal was to sink the Liberty and leave no survivors.

Warplanes and torpedo boats had already killed 34 and wounded 174, when Halbardier slid over the Liberty’s napalm-glazed deck to jury-rig an antenna and get an SOS off to the Sixth Fleet.  The Israelis intercepted the SOS and broke off the attack immediately. In effect, Halbardier prevented the massacre of all 294 onboard. Still, the infamy of the attack on the Liberty was two-fold.

First, the Liberty, a virtually defenseless intelligence collection platform prominently flying an American flag in international waters, came under deliberate attack by Israeli aircraft and three 60-ton Israeli torpedo boats off the coast of the Sinai on a cloudless June afternoon during the six-day Israeli-Arab war. Second, President Lyndon Johnson called back carrier aircraft dispatched to defend the Liberty lest Israel be embarrassed — the start of an unconscionable cover-up, including top Navy brass, that persists to this day.

Given all they have been through, the Liberty survivors and other veterans – who joined Halbardier to celebrate his belated receipt of the Silver Star on May 27, 2009 – can be forgiven for having doubted that the day of the hero’s recognition would ever come.

In the award ceremony at the Visalia (California) office of Rep. Devin Nunes, the Republican congressman pinned the Silver Star next to the Purple Heart that Halbardier found in his home mailbox three years ago. Nunes said, “The government has kept this quiet I think for too long, and I felt as my constituent he [Halbardier] needed to get recognized for the services he made to his country.”

Nunes got that right. Despite the many indignities the Liberty crew has been subjected to, the mood in Visalia was pronouncedly a joyous one of Better (42 years) Late Than Never. And, it did take some time for the moment to sink in: Wow, a gutsy congressman not afraid to let the truth hang out on this delicate issue.

Treatment Accorded the Skipper

I was present that day and I could not get out of my head the contrast between this simple, uncomplicated event and the earlier rigmarole that senior Navy officers went through to pin a richly deserved Medal of Honor on another hero of that day, the Liberty’s skipper, Captain William McGonagle.

Although badly wounded by Israeli fire on June 8, 1967, McGonagle was able to keep the bombed, torpedoed, napalmed Liberty afloat and limping toward Malta, where what was left of the bodies of the 34 crewmen killed and the 174 wounded could be attended to. Do the math: yes, killed and wounded amounted to more than two-thirds of the Liberty crew of 294.

I remembered what a naval officer involved in McGonagle’s award ceremony told one of the Liberty crew: “The government is pretty jumpy about Israel…the State Department even asked the Israeli ambassador if his government had any objections to McGonagle getting the medal.”

When McGonagle received his award, the White House (the normal venue for a Medal of Honor award) was all booked up, it seems, and President Lyndon Johnson (who would have been the usual presenter) was unavailable.

So it fell to the Secretary of the Navy to sneak off to the Washington Navy Yard on the banks of the acrid Anacostia River, where he presented McGonagle with the Medal of Honor and a citation that described the attack but not the identity of the attackers.

Please don’t misunderstand. The Liberty crew is not big on ceremony. They are VERY-not-big on politicians who wink when Navy comrades are killed and wounded at sea. The Liberty survivors are big on getting the truth out about what actually happened that otherwise beautiful day in June 1967.

The award of the Silver Star to Terry Halbardier marked a significant step in the direction of truth telling. Halbardier said he accepted his Silver Star on behalf of the entire 294-man crew. He and fellow survivor Don Pageler expressed particular satisfaction at the wording of the citation, which stated explicitly — with none of the usual fudging — the identity of the attackers: “The USS Liberty was attacked by Israeli aircraft and motor torpedo boats in the East Mediterranean Sea….”

In the past, official citations, like Captain McGonagle’s, had avoided mentioning Israel by name when alluding to the attack. I think former U.S. Ambassador Edward Peck put it best in condemning this kind of approach as “obsequious, unctuous subservience to the peripheral interests of a foreign nation at the cost of the lives and morale of our own service members and their families.”  Strong words for a diplomat. But right on.

Just a Guy From Texas

Were it not for Halbardier’s bravery, ingenuity, and technical expertise, the USS Liberty would surely have sunk, taking down much – if not all – of the crew.

You see, the first thing the Israeli aircraft bombed and strafed were the Liberty’s communications antennae and other equipment. They succeeded in destroying all the antennae that were functional. One antenna on the port side, though, had been out of commission and had escaped damage.

In receiving the Silver Star, Halbardier made light of his heroism, claiming that he was just a guy from Texas who could do a whole lot with simple stuff like baling wire. (In the infantry we called this kind of thing a “field expedient.”)

In any case, with his can-do attitude and his technical training, he figured he might be able to get that particular antenna working again. But first he would have to repair a cable that had been destroyed on deck and then connect the antenna to a transmitter.

The deck was still being strafed, but Halbardier grabbed a reel of cable, ran out onto the deck, and attached new cable to the antenna so a radioman could get an SOS out to the Sixth Fleet in the Mediterranean.

Voila. “Mayday” went out; almost immediately the Israeli aircraft and torpedo ships broke off the attack and went back to base; the Israeli government sent a quick apology to Washington for its unfortunate “mistake;” and President Johnson issued orders to everyone to make believe the Israelis were telling the truth — or at least to remain silent.

To their discredit, top Navy brass went along, and the Liberty survivors were threatened with court martial and prison if they so much as mentioned to their wives what had actually happened. They were enjoined as well from discussing it with one another.

As Liberty crewman Don Pageler put it, “We all headed out after that, and we didn’t talk to each other.” The circumstances were ready-made for serious Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.

The stories shared by Liberty survivors after the award ceremony, including descriptions of the macabre but necessary effort to reassemble torpedoed body parts, and the plague of survivor’s guilt, were as heart-rending as any I have heard. They are stories that should be shared more widely for those muzzled far too long.

These were the deep emotional scars to supplement the ones all over Halbardier’s body, some of which he uncovered when asked by the local press gathered there in Visalia. Typically, Halbardier made light of the shrapnel that had to be plucked out of his flesh, emphasizing that he was lucky compared to some of the other crew.

No Mistake

Despite Israeli protestations, the accumulated evidence, including intercepted voice communications, is such that no serious observer believes Israel’s “Oops” excuse of a terrible mistake. The following exchanges are excerpts of testimony from U.S. military and diplomatic officials given to Alison Weir, founder of “If Americans Knew” and author of American Media Miss the Boat:

Israeli pilot to ground control: “This is an American ship. Do you still want us to attack?”

Ground control: “Yes, follow orders.”

…………………..

“But sir, it’s an American ship — I can see the flag!”

Ground control: “Never mind; hit it!”

Haviland Smith, a CIA officer stationed in Beirut during the Six-Day War, says he was told that the transcripts were “deep-sixed,” because the U.S. government did not want to embarrass Israel.

Equally telling is the fact that the National Security Agency (NSA) destroyed voice tapes seen by many intelligence analysts, showing that the Israelis knew exactly what they were doing. I asked a former CIA colleague, who was also an analyst at that time, what he remembered of those circumstances. Here is his e-mail reply:

“The chief of the analysts studying the Arab-Israeli region at the time told me about the intercepted messages and said very flatly and firmly that the pilots reported seeing the American flag and repeated their requests of confirmation of the attack order. Whole platoons of Americans saw those intercepts. If NSA now says they do not exist, then someone ordered them destroyed.”

One need hardly add at this point that the destruction of evidence without investigation is an open invitation to repetition in the future. Think the more recent torture-interrogation videotapes.

As for the legal side: the late Captain Ward Boston, unburdened himself on his accomplice role as the Navy lawyer appointed as senior counsel to Adm. Isaac Kidd, who led a one-week (!) investigation and then followed orders to pronounce the attack on the Liberty a case of “mistaken identity.” Boston signed a formal declaration on Jan. 8, 2004, in which he said he was “outraged at the efforts of the apologists for Israel in this country to claim that this attack was a case of ‘mistaken identity.’” Boston continued:

“The evidence was clear. Both Adm. Kidd and I believed with certainty that this attack … was a deliberate effort to sink an American ship and murder its entire crew … Not only did the Israelis attack the ship with napalm, gunfire, and missiles, Israeli torpedo boats machine-gunned three lifeboats that had been launched in an attempt by the crew to save the most seriously wounded — a war crime …

“I know from personal conversations I had with Adm. Kidd that President Lyndon Johnson and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara ordered him to conclude that the attack was a case of ‘mistaken identity’ despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.”

W. Patrick Lang, Col., USA (ret.), who was the Defense Intelligence Agency’s top analyst for the Middle East for eight years, recounted the Israeli air attacks as follows: “The flight leader spoke to his base to report that he had the ship in view, that it was the same ship he had been briefed on, and that it was clearly marked with the U.S. flag…

“The flight commander was reluctant. That was very clear. He didn’t want to do this. He asked them a couple of times, ‘Do you really want me to do this?’ I’ve remembered it ever since. It was very striking. I’ve been harboring this memory for all these years.”

Lang, of course, is not alone. So too Terry Halbardier, who told those assembled last Wednesday, “I think about it [the attack on the Liberty] every day.”

Why Sink the Ship?

What we know for sure is, as the independent commission headed by former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Thomas Moorer put it, the attack “was a deliberate attempt to destroy an American ship and kill her entire crew.”

What we do not know for sure is why the Israelis wanted that done. Has no one dared ask the Israelis? One view is that the Israelis did not want the United States to find out they were massing troops to seize the Golan Heights from Syria and wanted to deprive the U.S. of the opportunity to argue against such a move.

James Bamford offers an alternative view in his excellent book, Body of Secrets. Bamford adduces evidence, including reporting from an Israeli journalist eyewitness and an Israeli military historian, of wholesale killing of Egyptian prisoners of war at the coastal town of El Arish in the Sinai.

The Liberty was patrolling directly opposite El Arish in international waters but within easy range to pick up intelligence on what was going on there. And the Israelis were well aware of that. But the important thing here is not to confuse what we know (the deliberate nature of the Israeli attack) with the ultimate purpose behind it, which remains open to speculation.

Also worth noting is the conventional wisdom prevalent in our Fawning Corporate Media (FCM) that Egypt forced Israel into war in June 1967. An excellent, authoritative source has debunked that — none other than former Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin! In an unguarded moment in 1982, when he was prime minister, he admitted publicly:

“In June 1967, we had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that [Egyptian President] Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”

Thus, the Israeli attack admittedly amounted to starting a war of aggression, and the occupied West Bank territories and the Golan Heights – gained by the Israelis in the 1967 war – remain occupied to this day. The post World War II tribunal at Nuremberg distinguished a “war of aggression” from other war crimes, terming it the “supreme international crime, differing from other war crimes only in that it contains the accumulated evil of the whole.”

Perhaps the attempt to sink the Liberty and finish off all survivors qualifies as one of those accumulated evils. Terry Halbardier summed it up this way when he was awarded his Silver Star:  “There’s lots of theories but let’s just say they didn’t want us listening in to what they wanted to do.”

Getting Away With Murder

In sum, on June 8, 1967, the Israeli government learned that it could get away with murder, literally, and the crime would be covered up, so strong is the influence of the Israel Lobby in our Congress — and indeed, in the White House. And those USS Liberty veterans who survived well enough to call for an independent investigation have been hit with charges of, you guessed it, anti-Semitism.

Does all this have relevance today? Of course. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu understands that there is little that Israel could do that would earn the opprobrium of the U.S. Congress or retaliation from the White House, whether it’s building illegal settlements or slaughtering civilians in Gaza. The Israelis seem convinced they remain in the catbird’s seat, largely because of the Israel Lobby’s influence with U.S. lawmakers and opinion makers.

One of the few moments when a U.S. official has had the audacity to face Israel down came from – significantly – a U.S. Navy admiral. In early July 2008, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, was sent to Israel to read the riot act to then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, who seemed to be itching to start hostilities with Iran while President George W. Bush was in office.

We learned from the Israeli press that Mullen, fearing some form of Israeli provocation, went so far as to warn the Israelis not to even think about another incident like the attack on the USS Liberty on June 8, 1967 — that the Israelis should disabuse themselves of the notion that U.S. military support would be knee-jerk automatic if Israel somehow provoked open hostilities with Iran.

This is the only occasion I am aware of in which a U.S. official of such seniority braced Israel about the Liberty incident. A gutsy move, especially with Vice President Dick Cheney and national security aide Elliott Abrams then in the White House, two hawks who might well bless — or even encourage — an Israeli provocation that would make it very difficult for Washington to avoid springing to the defense of its “ally.”

The Israelis know that Mullen knows that the attack on the Liberty was deliberate.  Mullen could have raised no more neuralgic an issue to take a shot across an Israeli bow than to cite the attack on the Liberty. The Jerusalem Post reported that Mullen cautioned that a Liberty-type incident must be avoided in any future military actions in the Middle East.

Perhaps Mullen had learned something from the heroism of Terry Halbardier.

Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in Washington, DC. During his career as a CIA analyst, he prepared and briefed the President’s Daily Brief and chaired National Intelligence Estimates. He is a member of the Steering Group of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).

Read More

McLaren more focussed on 2017 homework – Alonso

November 26, 2019 | News | No Comments

Fernando Alonso admits McLaren-Honda has been increasingly focussed on the 2017 Formula One season during Friday’s practice sessions.

The Spaniard was a lowly 18th in FP1 at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix before improving to 11th in the evening session at Yas Marina Circuit. But with next year’s rules revolution looming closer, Alonso explains why the lap times are not representative.

“I don’t think we can read too much into what happened on Friday,” the double world champion said. “In FP1 we didn’t really go for a time because we were trying many different things that are important for the future but not for this weekend.

“In fact the last three races we’ve been just working for 2017 on the Friday sessions, and today was no different”

Still, Alonso expects McLaren-Honda to fight on the fringes of the top 10 come Saturday’s qualifying session.

“From what we’ve seen in the last few races, the top six are on a different level, then there are Williams and Force India that looks like they’ll lock Q3 out and then we seem to be behind them, with a number of teams fighting for the best places behind the top ten.

“Of course, if one of the Williams or the Force India fails, then the faster of our group will make it into Q3.

“Hopefully we can get into Q3 but this weekend’s goal is a different one: to score points, try to finish ahead of Toro Rosso or just behind them, so they cannot make up for the 12-point deficit they have for us, while learning as much as possible for 2017.”

McLaren-Honda is currently sixth in the Constructors’ championship with 75 points.

REPORT: Hamilton leads Rosberg by just 0.079s in FP2

Silbermann says … Parting gifts galore

Grosjean column: Magnussen and THAT crash in Brazil

Chris Medland’s 2016 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix preview

FEATURE: Hamilton v Rosberg: 2016 F1 drivers’ title permutations

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Stirling Moss heads home after 134 days in hospital

November 26, 2019 | News | No Comments

British motor racing legend Stirling Moss returned home on Thursday after a prolonged stay in hospital battling a chest infection.

The 87-year-old was admitted to hospital on Dec. 22 in Singapore, where he had been due to embark on a Christmas cruise with friends.

“After some 134 days in hospitals, we are delighted to be able to say that Sir Stirling is now at home. He is thrilled to be back where he belongs,” a statement said on his website (www.stirlingmoss.com).

“He still has a substantial amount of recovery to undertake but says that he has determination and a great pit crew.”

Often described as the greatest F1 driver never to win the world championship, Sir Stirling Moss competed in 66 Grand Prix between 1951 and 1961, collecting 16 wins and 16 pole position along the way.

Win the ULTIMATE TRACKDAY with F1i.com!

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

 

Kimi Raikkonen says he has “a lot of trust” in Ferrari’s ability to fix the issues that have been hampering its progress in 2016.

Having entered the current Formula One season as Mercedes’ nearest challenger, the Scuderias has failed to build on a promising three-win campaign in 2015 and slipped behind Red Bull in the competitive order.

Ferrari has been well aware of its weaknesses, especially in terms of aerodynamics, and its 2007 world champion is confident these can be cured for next year.

“Yes we have been trying to improve them all year and to put it simply we need more grip and more power to go faster,” Raikkonen said.

“It sounds very simple but it is not unfortunately and I think we have understood a lot of things lately and we have great people to work and I have a lot of trust that we will fix those issues for next year.

“There is no guarantee where we are going to be but what we have done this year and understood things, we can be quite confident that we will be good. Good enough? That is a different matter.”

This weekend’s Brazilian Grand Prix sees the Finn return to the scene of his title win, with Raikkonen sealing the 2007 crown by taking victory at Interlagos in a nail-biting showdown against the McLaren pair of Lewis Hamilton and Fernando Alonso.

“It was a great memory in my first year with Ferrari and we managed to win it which wasn’t anywhere easier overall,” the 37-year-old added. “We started out okay then had some difficulties in the middle of the season and came back strong and managed to win it.

“It was a great end to a tricky season and obviously it was quite a long time ago so hopefully we will soon be in a position to fight at least for it [world titles].

“The end result was good but coming in we had nothing to lose so in that way it was easy as another race and we did a good job. It was a great memory.”

Romain Grosjean column: Time for Haas to raise its game

Chris Medland’s 2016 Brazilian Grand Prix

FEATURE: What Rosberg need to do to win the title in Brazil

INTERVIEW: Fernando Alonso: Why F1 is no longer just for heroes

TECHNICAL: Under the skin of the Ferrari SF16-H

F1i Classic: Brazil 1991 – Senna’s pain and glory

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Raikkonen describes P3 lap as ‘pretty average’

November 26, 2019 | News | No Comments

Kimi Raikkonen says his final lap in qualifying was “pretty average” despite taking third on the grid for the Brazilian Grand Prix.

The Finn secured his best grid slot at Interlagos since 2008 by beating the Red Bulls and team-mate Sebastian Vettel to third place. Despite being best of the rest behind the two Mercedes drivers – and leading a group of four cars covered by 0.136s – Raikkonen said he wasn’t overly happy with his final attempt in Q3.

  • REPORT: Hamilton takes crucial pole from Rosberg by 0.102s

“I struggled the whole qualifying, in a few places, a few corners and in the middle sector,” Raikkonen said. “To be honest the last lap was pretty average in my view, but obviously it was enough to be in third place. The Mercedes seems to be a bit too far.

“I struggled in the first two corners with tyre warm-up a bit and even the middle I wasn’t very happy but I don’t mind, it was good enough for this and we will see what we can do.”

Asked why he thinks he was able to get the better of Red Bull at Interlagos, Raikkonen says the battle between the two teams is decided by fine margins.

“It’s been very close. Most of the year we were close and obviously sometimes we were behind and sometimes in front but I think we did reasonable races, very good job as a team. We improved in certain areas and tried new things and learned some positive things.

“I think as a team we work very well … Hopefully we can do a good, strong race tomorrow.”

Silbermann says … I’m going AWOL

Romain Grosjean column: Time for Haas to raise its game

FEATURE: What Rosberg need to do to win the title in Brazil

INTERVIEW: Fernando Alonso: Why F1 is no longer just for heroes

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Montreal mayor Denis Coderre has confirmed that the 2017 Canadian Grand Prix will take place at Circuit Gilles-Villeneuve, following a period of uncertainty around the popular event.

Although the race featured on the 2017 provisional calendar released by the FIA a couple of months ago, it was listed as ‘subject to confirmation’ along with the German and Brazilian Grands Prix.

Coderre tweeted on Tuesday that “[we have] an agreement in principle with FOWC [Formula One World Championship] and Octane [the race organisers].

“There will be a Grand Prix of Canada in 2017.”

Click Here: Rugby league Jerseys

Octane Racing Group president and CEO François Dumontier has also confirmed the news in a statement.

“Montréal and Circuit Gilles-Villeneuve produce one of the most exciting Grands Prix of the season,” he said. “In 2017, everyone will have even more good reasons to be there since we’ll be celebrating the 50th anniversary of the inaugural Canadian Formula 1 Grand Prix.

“Not only it will be an anniversary year for our event, we will have the great pleasure to see on track for the first time this very talented young Canadian driver who is Lance Stroll.

“We are pleased to offer fans an opportunity to come in large numbers and be part of this great tradition, a Formula 1 race that happens to be always very exciting and that has written history so often over the years.”

Canada will have a representative in F1 for the first time since 1997 world champion Jacques Villeneuve left the sport in 2006, as 2015 European Formula 3 champion Stroll prepares to make his series debut with Williams next year.

The final 2017 F1 calendar is set to be confirmed at the next meeting of the World Motor Sport Council.

FEATURE: Hamilton v Rosberg: 2016 F1 drivers’ title permutations

TECHNICAL: Under the skin of the McLaren-Honda MP4-31

INTERVIEW: Rob Smedley on Felipe Massa

2017 driver line-ups so far

FEATURE: When F1 team-mates fight for the title

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

‘Too early’ to promote Wehrlein – Tost

November 26, 2019 | News | No Comments

Toro Rosso team principal Franz Tost believes it would be ‘too early’ for Mercedes to promote Pascal Wehrlein to its multiple championship-winning works outfit.

The German manufacturer has been forced to revisit its 2017 line-up in the wake of Nico Rosberg’s shock decision to retire as a world champion.

  • 2016 driver ratings: 12-1

Mercedes protégé Wehrlein, who is coming off a strong rookie season at Manor and has been testing extensively with Pirelli’s 2017-spec tyres, initially seemed the best fit for the triple world champions. But Williams ace Valtteri Bottas has emerged as the front-runner to partner Lewis Hamilton in 2017.

While Red Bull motorsport advisor Helmut Marko recently taunted Niki Lauda about Mercedes’s reluctance to give Wehrlein the nod, Tost understands the constructor’s position.

“This is a very difficult situation to be in, no doubt about it,” the Toro Rosso boss said of Rosberg’s surprise departure in an interview with Austrian publication Tiroler Tageszeitung.

“The team that has won everything over the past few years now has to replace a world champion. And it happened at a very late stage, with all top drivers locked in their current contracts.”

Talking about Wehrlein, Tost added: “They have a very good driver waiting in the wings. But the expectations of a world championship-caliber team are naturally quite different. Sooner or later, Wehrlein will be able to win but it is still too early.

“I have always said that a driver needs three years to understand everything in Formula One. Of course having a Hamilton/Wehrlein pairing would be the easiest solution but we’re talking about the defending world champions here.

“There is a lot of money at stake. At any rate, having an open seat that late is not great for the team’s stability.”

Click Here: United Kingdom Rugby Jerseys

It’s quite interesting to hear Tost say that promoting Wehrlein would be too early. Red Bull certainly did not hesitate to pull the trigger and poach Max Verstappen from Toro Rosso after one year and four grands prix, which worked out quite well.

2016 driver ratings: 24-13

2016 team-by-team review: Part two

2016 team-by-team review: Part one

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

F1 community reacts to Rosberg’s retirement

November 26, 2019 | News | No Comments

A number of Formula One drivers, past and present, have taken to their social media channels to share their reaction to 2016 world champion Nico Rosberg’s shock retirement from the sport.

The German broke the news ahead of the annual FIA Prizegiving ceremony in Vienna, saying he has fulfilled his childhood dream and is no longer willing to make the sort of sacrifice associated with the highly competitive environment of grand prix racing.

The overriding sentiment among Rosberg’s peers is that the latest title winner deserves a great deal of respect for his decision. F1 teams and partners, as well as circuit officials, have also also tuned in to sing the praises of the first world champion not to defend his title since Alain Prost in 1994.

The FIA has chosen McLaren Applied Technologies as the exclusive supplier of engine pressure and temperature sensors in F1 from 2018 to 2020.

The three year deal will see MAT’s sensors used to monitor critical parameters on all teams’ highly sophisticated Formula 1 power units.

The supply follows  the FIA’s drive to contain costs and complements the FIA Single Engine Control Unit, (SECU) used by all teams in Formula 1 and supplied by McLaren Applied Technologies since 2008.

  • Brown: McLaren can’t last much longer than 2018!

Rodi Basso, motorsport director of McLaren Applied Technologies, expressed the company’s satisfaction with the FIA’s contract.

“We’re delighted McLaren Applied Technologies has been chosen by the FIA to be the trusted sole provider of engine pressure and temperature sensors for the 2018 to 2020 FIA Formula 1 World Championships,” Basso said.

“From the ECU technology in every Formula 1 car to the engineers supporting teams at the track, McLaren Applied Technologies continues to be at the heart of motorsport.

“Our mission is to provide an unrivalled service, ensuring the world’s premier race teams and series can continue to grow and delight fans around the world.”

GALLERY: F1 drivers’ wives and girlfriends

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

 

Click Here: cheap INTERNATIONAL jersey