Month: September 2020

Home / Month: September 2020

Responding to the troubling suppression of science under the Trump administration, thousands of scientists, allies, and frontline communities are holding a rally in Boston’s Copley Square on Sunday.

#standupforscience Tweets

“Science serves the common good,” reads the call to action. “It protects the health of our communities, the safety of our families, the education of our children, the foundation of our economy and jobs, and the future we all want to live in and preserve for coming generations.”

It continues: 

The rally was planned to coincide with the annual American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) conference, which draws thousands of science professionals, and is a precursor to the March for Science in Washington, D.C. and in cities around the world on April 22.

Since Donald Trump became president, numerous climate change deniers have been confirmed to lead key scientific cabinets. What’s more, the administration has has cracked down on federal agencies’ use of social media and access to reporters, demanded that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) submit research for political vetting before publishing, and deleted or hidden what were once public records from government websites.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

These efforts to discredit science have sparked a growing and historic resistance movement, from rogue Twitter accounts to scientists racing to archive climate change and other threatened data from government servers.

[block:block=30]

Scientists and coders have been racing to save climate change data from government servers before the administration deletes it.

Click Here: gold coast suns 2019 guernsey

“I have never seen my colleagues so galvanized than after this most recent election,” AAAS president Barbara Schaal said in a recent interview.

When asked about science becoming a political issue, as is currently the case with climate data, the group’s CEO Rush Holt observed that “scientists have to be reminded that the response to a challenge to science is not to retreat to the microscope, to the laboratory, to the ivory tower. This requires vigorous defense. We think science is so beneficial to society that it should be defended.”

Nearly two thousand people have said they will attend Sunday’s Rally to Stand Up for Science with as many as eight thousand more pledging interest. It begins at 12pm EDT with updates shared on social media under the hashtag #StandUpforScience.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

A new movement is aiming to mail at least 1 million postcards to President Donald Trump on Wednesday, March 15—historically dubbed “the Ides of March” and known as the day Julius Caesar was assassinated—to show “the man, the media, and the politicians how vast our numbers are…to make it irrefutable that the president’s claim of wide support is a farce.”

Click Here: COLLINGWOOD MAGPIES 2019

“He may draw a big crowd with empty promises, but the crowd of those that oppose his agenda is exponentially larger. And we will show up to protest, to vote, and to be heard. Again and again and again,” the group, which calls itself the Ides of Trump, explained on its website and Facebook page.

The group outlines five steps to participate:

  1. Write one postcard. Write a dozen! Create your own cards, buy them, share them, it doesn’t matter as long as you write #TheIdes or #TheIdesOfTrump on them somewhere.
  2.  Take a picture of your cards and post them on social media (tagged with #TheIdesOfTrump or #TheIdes, please). This will help us verify our numbers.
  3. Spread the word! Everyone on Earth can let Washington know their opinion of the President. They can’t build a wall high enough to stop the mail.
  4. Get ready for the NEXT postcard campaign, and the next, and the next—because we’re not going away. We will make ourselves heard by joining together. And together, we will wield the kind of political clout that can’t be ignored.

As Leslie Evans, an artist and printmaker who produced about 900 postcards for the event last week in Watertown, Massachusetts, told the Boston Globe on Monday, “Obviously, numbers matter a lot to [Trump.]” Her postcards feature slogans that paraphrase chants commonly heard at anti-Trump protests, such as “Compassion, not fear, immigrants are welcome here,” and “Hear our voice, you are not the majority choice.”

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

The Ides of Trump also makes clear that while the basis is comical, the impetus is not.

“So sharpen your wit, unsheathe your writing implements, and write from the heart,” they write. “All of our issues—DAPL [the Dakota Access Pipeline], women’s rights, racial discrimination, religious freedom, immigration, economic security, education, the environment, conflicts of interest, the existence of facts—can and should find common cause. That cause is to make it irrefutable that the president’s claim of wide support is a farce.”

“[W]e, in vast numbers, from all corners of the world, will overwhelm Washington,” the organizers write, “and we will bury the White House post office in pink slips, all informing the president that he’s fired!”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

House Republicans pulled their healthcare bill, the American Health Care Act (AHCA), just before the vote was to take place.

Democratic Rep. Barbara Lee of California described the bill’s failure as “a victory for the resistance,” while the New York Times writes that it’s “a humiliating defeat for President Trump on the first legislative showdown of his presidency.”

The decision to pull the bill followed a meeting at the White House between House Speaker Paul Ryan (Wis.) and Trump, in which Ryan told the president that there weren’t enough votes for the measure to pass. Ryan said at a press conference Friday that he told the president that the bill should be pulled and that Trump agreed.

As for his party’s failure to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, he said, “Big things are hard to do.”

According to American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) national political director Faiz Shakir, the outcome showed that “[d]emocracy triumphed.”

“The people have spoken and they said ‘no’ to this dangerous agenda. They said ‘no’ to blocking access to Planned Parenthood, ‘no’ to more restrictions on abortion coverage, ‘no’ to slashing Medicaid and forcing people with disabilities into institutions, and ‘no’ to gutting essential health benefits like maternity and mental healthcare,” Shakir said in a press statement.

“It’s clear that millions of Americans have embraced progress and do not want to go back. It’s time for Congress and the Trump administration to move on and focus on ideas that actually improve our lives—not those that target vulnerable communities and roll back essential rights for millions of Americans,” he continued.

Click Here: Rugby league Jerseys

Advocacy groups and Democratic lawmakers celebrated the development on Twitter:

Still, Democrats shouldn’t be too quick to pull out the champagne, says the National Nurses United (NNU).

“Instead of enacting a genuine transformation of our flawed healthcare system when Democrats had the White House and bigger majorities in Congress than the Republicans have now, they failed to enact a national system, like an improved Medicare-for-all, that would guarantee healthcare for all Americans, with real patient choice, and effective cost controls,” said NNU Executive Director RoseAnn DeMoro

“Why the Ryan bill ultimately failed is its premise that throwing more people to the wolves of the healthcare market would undeniably exacerbate the crisis for the people left behind by the gaps in the ACA. And they had to confront a massive rebellion by people in every corner, in every Congressional district across the nation,” she continued.

“What policy makers should do now is learn the lesson that most of the rest of the world has discovered, implement a system based on care, not profits, not corporate insurance. As the town halls and massive protests have made clear, the people are ready for real reform and a change in national priorities that puts our health first, not last,” DeMoro concluded.

As resistance efforts urge constituents to call their representatives to #killthebill, the death of the Republicans’ American Health Care Act (AHCA) appears early Friday afternoon to be near certain.

#KillTheBill Tweets

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Just before 2:00pm, White House press secretary Sean Spicer would not discuss the administration’s strategy if Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (Wis.) confirms to President Donald Trump that Republicans do not have the votes to pass the measure.

“I’m not going to comment,” Spicer said. “I think the speaker and the president are going to have a discussion about where those votes are and what some of the members’ needs are and we’ll take it from there.”

Just ahead of that press briefing, Ryan visited the White House, where he reportedly told Trump that it didn’t have enough Republican support to pass.

That’s despite the White House on Thursday having sent out budget director Mick Mulvaney to tell Republicans that if they don’t support the AHCA, the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known Obamacare, will remain the “law of the land.”

The New York Times writes that Trump and Ryan

The House had been scheduled to vote Thursday on the measure, but having been “met with a deluge of outrage and calls,” as Common Dreams wrote, it was pushed to Friday. It is set to take place at 3:30pm.

The Huffington Post notes: “The GOP bill has been changed so much that the usual Congressional Budget Office analysis, which would assess the final measure’s impact, does not yet exist.” The most recent scoring from the CBO, however, shows it would still threaten coverage for 24 million people by 2026, and a new Quinnipiac University released Thursday found that only 17 percent of voters currently approve of the GOP bill.

And, as Common Dreams noted, “In a last-minute gift to the ultraconservative House Freedom caucus, Ryan and Trump stripped (pdf) the AHCA of the ‘essential health benefits’ central to Obamacare, which mandates that insurance plans include coverage for basic care, such as maternity and wellness visits.”

The Indivisible Guide and others say those opposed to the bill should pick up their phones to press their members of Congress to vote ‘no.’

“What’s happening today is a lose-lose situation for the Republicans,” said House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi.  “It’s a lose-lose for the American people, that’s for sure. But the people who vote for this will have this vote tattooed to their foreheads as they go forward.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

Does President Donald Trump assume his administration can just launch a surprise, unilateral military attack against Syria?

“I’m not saying I’m doing anything one way or another, but I’m certainly not going to be telling you.” —President Donald TrumpThe clear impression he left during a Wednesday afternoon press conference at the White House, as he stood alongside Jordan’s King Abdullah II, is that he can—and that he just might—but that he won’t tell “you” about it.

Just hours after the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations appeared to threaten unilateral action against Syria, Trump said he considers the alleged use of chemical weapons on Tuesday “beyond a red line” that “would not be tolerated” but refused to offer any clarity on what actions his administration would take in response.

Though he cited no evidence, Trump put the blame for Tuesday’s chemical attack squarely at the feet of Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad and said his previous attitude toward the Syrian government—presented essentially as a hands-off approach—has “changed very much” in the last 24 hours.

“I will tell you, that attack on children yesterday had a big impact on me,” Trump said. “Big impact.”

In response to Trump’s afternoon remarks, Phyllis Bennis, director of the New Internationalism Project at the Institute for Policy Studies, told Common Dreams the president showed a “total lack of any strategic coherence in his foreign policy.”

Trump is repeating a familiar mistake, said Bennis, by publicly blaming “the Syrian regime for the horrific chemical attack in Idlib without any certainty of who is actually responsible – something common to virtually all recent presidents.” Notably, she added, it was Trump who “urged President Obama not to attack Syria after the chemical bombing of 2013, tweeting in all caps “DO NOT ATTACK SYRIA — IF YOU DO MANY VERY BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN.”

Now, said Bennis, it’s clear that Trump is considering a military response himself, even as the investigatory process has only just begun. As Bennis notes, the deadly attack in 2013 “was also by carried out by uncertain perpetrators, and again saw the U.S. government blaming the Syrian regime despite the lack of clear proof.” 

Once again, the finger-pointing in the wake of a vicious massacre will have serious regional and global implications.

During a tense meeting of the UN Security Council earlier in the day, members demanded a thorough and credible investigation into what happened on Tuesday. While the U.S. and its western allies pointed the finger at Assad for the attack, Russia’s ambassador insisted that blame should not be assigned until an official probe, including expert and impartial analysis of the area where the massacre took place, could be conducted. Unfortunately, said Russia’s deputy UN envoy Vladimir Safronkov, the U.S. and its European allies have “a well-defined ideological slant” when it comes to chemical weapons and questioned the direction the council was headed.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Click Here: Maori All Blacks Store

As Reuters further reports:

The Russian and Syrian governments contest the narrative emerging in the western media and said the source of the deadly chemicals was an ammunition depot operated by rebel forces that was targeted and struck by Syrian government airstrikes.

At a separate meeting focused on Syria in Brussels on Wednesday, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov reiterated the importance of an impartial investigation into the deadly incident. “The task is to send a up-to-the-point investigative mission there if there’s a genuine desire to establish truth,” he said. “This mission should have balanced staffing and should produce unbiased assessments.”  

In the U.S. Congress, military hawks indicated they saw Tuesday’s horrific scenes of children dying as a new opportunity to push for escalated U.S. military action in Syria and the toppling of Assad. “This is the biggest test yet of the Trump presidency,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said in a statement. “The president has an opportunity to punish Assad in a way that President Obama never would. This is the moment for President Trump to prove to everyone that when it comes to foreign policy and standing up to dictators, he is not President Obama. I don’t believe this President will make the same mistakes of his predecessor when it comes to Assad.”

Though unsurprising coming from Sen. Graham, those comments run counter to the military and foreign policy experts who applauded Obama’s ultimate decision not to make matters worse in Syria by deepening U.S. military involvement in 2012-13.

Meanwhile, when Trump was asked during his afternoon press conference to clarify what actions his administration might take against Syria, Trump simply reiterated that his “know-nothing” military strategy—which essentially revolves around surprise attacks and being “smarter than the generals”—will somehow “fix” the terrible “big mess” he inherited from his predecessors.

“I’m not saying I’m doing anything one way or another, but I’m certainly not going to be telling you,” Trump told reporters on Wednesday.

And, yes, that also means… you.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

President Donald Trump on Monday congratulated Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan on the controversial referendum over the weekend that granted him sweeping new powers amid accusations of human rights violations.

Trump called Erdoğan on Monday to discuss the outcome of the vote, which gives the Turkish president the power to rule by decree and authorizes the abolition of the prime minister’s office, and which opponents have slammed as a possible death knell for Turkey’s democratic institutions.

That makes Trump the first, and thus far only, Western leader to congratulate Erdoğan on the power grab.

“If there’s a compelling defense for this, it’s hiding well,” wrote Steve Benen at MSNBC.

The laudatory conversation seemed to reflect Trump’s authoritarian similarities with the Turkish president. In addition to discussing Erdoğan’s win, the two leaders spoke about the recent U.S. strike against a Syrian air base, which Trump thanked Erdoğan for supporting, and the continuing fight against the Islamic State (ISIS). A White House readout of the phone call did not mention whether Trump raised concerns over accusations of voter intimidation, unfair campaigning, and ballot irregularities.

Observers criticized the call. “Even after everything, this is astounding. Formally and publicly congratulating an act of authoritarianization. Astounding,” tweeted New York Times reporter Max Fisher.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

The call also contradicted statements by Trump’s own press secretary and State Department.

At a briefing Monday, press secretary Sean Spicer was asked what Trump would like to see the Turkish president do, to which he responded, “I think we’d rather not get ahead of that report and start to make decisions without knowing. There were observers there, as there routinely are, and I’d rather wait and see.”

But with the phone call, it seems Trump didn’t wait and see.

And the U.S. State Department released a statement Monday urging the Turkish government to “protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of all its citizens—regardless of their vote on April 16—as guaranteed by the Turkish Constitution and in accordance with Turkey’s international commitments, such as under the Helsinki Charter,” which requires signatory countries to uphold human rights.

Meanwhile, international monitors with the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) raised concerns over a decision by the electoral board to accept ballots that did not have official stamps, as required by Turkish law, which critics said could amount to election fraud. Opposition parties in the country on Tuesday filed a request to annul the result, which they said came after intimidation, unfair campaigning, and voting irregularities.

State Department spokesperson Mark Toner and human rights watchdogs echoed those concerns, prompting Erdoğan to warn the OSCE to “know your place.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Click Here: cd universidad catolica

Read More

With just days for Republicans in the U.S. Senate to pass their Trumpcare bill before a congressional recess that begins at the end of this week, an updated version of an iconic ad is back on Monday featuring an elderly woman being foisted from her wheelchair over the edge of a cliff.

Click Here: Putters

Taking direct aim at the hypocrisy of President Donald Trump’s support for the bill—which he characterizes as “mean” but also enthusiastically supports—the new ad pairs earlier footage of candidate Trump castigating Republican Speaker of the House Paul Ryan for his previous attempts to gut healthcare protections for the nation’s sick and elderly with clips of the president celebrating Ryan last month when the House pushed through their version of Trumpcare that did exactly that.

Watch the ad:

“Bringing back our massively impactful ‘Granny Off the Cliff’ ad, which Paul Ryan himself credited for sinking his 2011 budget proposal targeting Medicare, this new video rips apart their health care plan and makes brutally clear just how damaging Medicaid cuts will be for America’s seniors,” said the Agenda Project Action Fund, which co-produced the ad, in a statement.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

According to the group, the Senate version of Republican approach would devastate the healthcare of seniors in numerous and specific ways:

The ‘Lady Off the Cliff’ has worked in the past, the group said, but the battle this week to defeat Trumpcare in the Senate “might be her most important fight” yet.

Along with their partners and allies at SaveGranny.org, the Agenda Project is urging people to mobilize against the Senate bill by calling their lawmakers this week. This, said the group, “is an all-hands-on-deck emergency. For the sake of Granny and millions of others who will be hurt if this bill passes, please take a moment to share this video, and call your Senators at 202-224-3121.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

Senate Republicans are preparing to hold a closed-door caucus meeting on Wednesday to discuss what to do about GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore if he wins the special election in Alabama. 

Sen. John CornynJohn CornynSenate headed for late night vote amid standoff over lands bill Koch-backed group launches ad campaign to support four vulnerable GOP senators Tim Scott to introduce GOP police reform bill next week MORE (R-Texas), the No. 2 Senate Republican, confirmed that Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote GOP senator to try to reverse requirement that Pentagon remove Confederate names from bases No, ‘blue states’ do not bail out ‘red states’ MORE (R-Ky.) has called a closed-door caucus meeting for 10 a.m.

“I think that’s part of the discussion, yes,” he said, asked by The Hill if Republicans would use the meeting to talk about the outcome of the Alabama special election.

A spokesman for McConnell — asked if Republicans would discuss anything else including their tax bill or government funding strategy during the meeting — declined to comment until after the Alabama Senate race is called.

ADVERTISEMENT
Polls in Alabama will close at 8 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday night.

The impromptu meeting comes as Senate Republicans have been tightlipped about what they will do about Moore if he wins Tuesday’s special election in Alabama.

McConnell and other top GOP senators have predicted that he will face an Ethics Committee investigation after several women came forward and said Moore pursued relationships with them when they were teenagers and he was in his 30s.

Under a 1960s Supreme Court decision, Republicans are required to seat Moore, who has denied wrongdoing, if he wins. 

Sen. Cory GardnerCory Scott GardnerSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Interior faces legal scrutiny for keeping controversial acting leaders in office | White House faces suit on order lifting endangered species protections | Lawmakers seek investigation of Park Police after clearing of protesters The Hill’s Campaign Report: Republicans go on attack over calls to ‘defund the police’ MORE (R-Colo.), the chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, has called on the Senate to hold an expulsion vote if Moore wins. But the last time the Senate expelled a member was in 1862 for supporting the Confederacy, and GOP senators haven’t rushed to back Gardner. 

GOP senators are also expected to discuss if they want to give Moore committee assignments or invite him into the caucus’s closed-door policy lunches. 

McConnell sidestepped a question earlier Tuesday about if he would give Moore a spot on the Senate’s committees. 

“All of those are good questions for tomorrow. And we await the outcome of the Alabama Senate race,” he told reporters. Cornyn noted on Tuesday night that “no judgments” have been made yet on Moore’s fate, but expected it to come up during Wednesday’s meeting. 

“I think all of that’s going to be a part of the discussion, but no judgements made [yet],” he said.  A GOP aide noted separately that the decision about whether or not to give Moore committee assignments would be made by the full GOP caucus.  Republicans raced to distance themselves following the allegations against Moore. The former judge, in turn, has also lashed out at McConnell, including refusing to say if he would support him as majority leader.  If Moore wins, he wouldn’t immediately impact the GOP agenda. McConnell noted earlier Tuesday that Sen. Luther StrangeLuther Johnson StrangeThe biggest political upsets of the decade State ‘certificate of need’ laws need to go GOP frets over nightmare scenario for Senate primaries MORE (R-Ala.), whom Moore defeated in the primary, would remain in the Senate until they wrap up their work for the year. 

Howard Dean says older members of the Democratic Party need “to get the hell out of the way and have somebody who is 50 running the country.”

Click Here: New Zealand rugby store

“I don’t think [Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersThe Hill’s 12:30 Report: Milley apologizes for church photo-op Harris grapples with defund the police movement amid veep talk Biden courts younger voters — who have been a weakness MORE] is going to be the next nominee. But he could be. But I’m very much for somebody who is younger,” said Dean, a former Democratic National Committee chairman and MSNBC contributor on “Morning Joe” Thursday.

“Morning Joe” guest co-host Willie Geist noted that meant big party names such as former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenHillicon Valley: Biden calls on Facebook to change political speech rules | Dems demand hearings after Georgia election chaos | Microsoft stops selling facial recognition tech to police Trump finalizing executive order calling on police to use ‘force with compassion’ The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden campaign goes on offensive against Facebook MORE, who has hinted at running, as well as Sanders, who has strong grassroots support from the party’s left after his run against Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonWhite House accuses Biden of pushing ‘conspiracy theories’ with Trump election claim Biden courts younger voters — who have been a weakness Trayvon Martin’s mother Sybrina Fulton qualifies to run for county commissioner in Florida MORE, would be out. Biden is 75 and Sanders is 76.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think my generation needs to get the hell out of politics. Start coaching and start moving up this next generation who are more … fiscally sane,” Dean continued. “Neither Republicans or Democrats can claim they are fiscally responsible anymore.

“This young generation is going to pay for that if we don’t get the hell out of the way and have somebody who is 50 running the country.”

He also highlighted some potential younger contenders.

“I’m going to support someone who is young and in the next generation,” said Dean, naming Sens. Chris MurphyChristopher (Chris) Scott MurphyState, city education officials press Congress for more COVID-19 funds The Hill’s 12:30 Report: Trump takes victory lap in morning news conference Pelosi demands Trump clarify deployment of unidentified law enforcement in DC MORE (D-Conn.), Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisRand Paul introduces bill to end no-knock warrants The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden campaign goes on offensive against Facebook McEnany says Juneteenth is a very ‘meaningful’ day to Trump MORE (D-Calif.), and Kirsten GillibrandKirsten GillibrandWarren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Warren, Pressley introduce bill to make it a crime for police officers to deny medical care to people in custody Senate Dems press DOJ over coronavirus safety precautions in juvenile detention centers MORE (D-N.Y.) as well as Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, the son of former L.A. district attorney Gil Garcetti, as possible contenders.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if 17 people run,” Dean said.

“Like the Republican primary the last time around,” Geist said.

“Hopefully there won’t be people in it for the fun of it,” Dean added.

“And end up winning it anyway,” joked panelist Sam Stein, in a shot at President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE.

Dean also said he thinks “progressives are in the process of informally taking over the Democratic party” and that “the country has moved to the left.”

Dean, 69, led the field at one point during the 2004 Democratic presidential primary.

His comments come as cable news programs have run segments previewing the upcoming midterm elections and also the 2020 presidential race.

Seizing upon the now record high support for a Medicare-for-all bill, advocates for such a system are pushing House Minority Leader Nancy Peolosi (D-Calif.) to throw her weight behind the legislation.

The Expanded and Improved Medicare for All Act, HR676, reintroduced in January by Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) this week claimed for the first time support from more than half of the Democratic caucus, reaching 104 co-sponsors in Congress.

Pelosi is not among them.

Instead, she appears on a list of 89 House Democrats not supporting Conyers’ legislation. Justice Democrats, an advocacy group calling for an overhaul of the Democratic Party, put out on social media this week an infographic highlighting their names:

But the time to act on the legislation is now, said Donna Smith, executive director of Progressive Democrats of America (PDA). In fact, it is “long overdue,” she stated Friday.

“Because of my family’s harrowing experiences with failures of the American healthcare system, I dedicated myself to fight for healthcare as a human right,” added Smith, who was featured in Michael Moore’s 2007 documentary Sicko. “Conyers’ legislation is the best hope for Americans, like my own family, who are facing bankruptcy or death if we or a loved one suffers even just one serious accident or illness.”

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Given the stakes, PDA and its allies say members of Congress, and especially the House leadership, must go beyond just opposing TrumpCare, the GOP healthcare bill, and must help advance HR676. As such, PDA members recently sent letters to congressional offices touting the bill as “the best healthcare solution.”

The call from PDA bookends a month in which Medicare-for-all advocates held rallies in scores of communities across the nation “to go on the offense and demand a healthcare system that covers everyone and costs less.”

Support for just that was evident this week in California, where the state Senate Health Committee advanced a single-payer healthcare bill.

“With today’s vote we are closer to being able to say, once and for all, that healthcare is not a privilege, it’s a human right,” the bill’s author, Democratic state Sen. Ricardo Lara, said. “Every family, every child, every senior deserves healthcare that costs less and covers more, and California has a chance to lead the rest of the nation toward universal care,” he stated.

According to Dr. Carol Paris, president of Physicians for a National Healthcare Program, “The momentum towards a universal health program is unstoppable.”

“Americans of all political stripes are reiterating their long-held support for improved Medicare for all, and Congress has a responsibility to act. We urge all members—including Republicans, whose constituents are demanding a better healthcare system—to come together and finally enact HR.676. Now is the time,” Paris said this week.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Click Here: Geelong Cats Guernsey

Read More

Top House Democrats on Friday raised concerns that Attorney General Jeff Sessions violated the law and lied under oath to Congress if he directly participated in President Donald Trump’s decision to fire FBI director James Comey.

Sessions reportedly recommended earlier this week that Trump fire Comey amid the investigation into alleged Russian election interference. On Thursday, Trump told NBC‘s Lester Holt that he had planned to do it “regardless,” although he credited the recommendation to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. His statement raised numerous questions, chief among which was whether Sessions inserted himself into the probe despite pledging in March to recuse himself after he was found to have lied during his confirmation hearings in January.

Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (D-Ga.), the ranking member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) on Friday sent a letter (pdf) to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein raising “grave concerns” over the news.

“If the facts now being reported are accurate, it appears that the attorney general’s actions in recommending that President Trump fire director Comey may have contradicted his sworn testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee at his confirmation hearing, breached the public recusal he made before the American people, and violated the law enacted by Congress to prevent conflicts of interest at the Department of Justice,” Cummings and Conyers wrote.

Cummings and Conyers said Sessions may have violated Section 528 of title 28 of the United States Code, which require the DOJ to establish rules that disqualify “any officer or employee of the Department of Justice…from participation in a particular investigation or prosecution if such participation may result in a personal, financial, or political conflict of interest, or the appearance thereof.”

The penalty for violating that law could be removal from office.

“Since the attorney general previously recused himself from these matters—and since he may not sit in judgment on his own failure to comply with the law—we request that you, as the acting attorney general in this matter, report to us on the steps that must now be followed to address this apparent abuse,” the lawmakers wrote.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

“We recognize that the attorney general’s actions have thrust you into a very delicate position with respect to enforcing the law of the land against your superior,” they added. “In this case, however, the attorney general previously recused himself from these matters, leaving you with the solemn obligation to fulfill your responsibilities to the Department of Justice and the nation.”

Their concerns were echoed in the Senate.

“Attorney General Sessions should not have had any involvement in this decision at all,” Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.), said Friday. “He recused himself. And yet he inserted himself in this firing.”

And Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) tweeted on Wednesday, “Sessions said he’d recuse himself from anything to do with Russia. It’s clear he did not. Calling for him to resign (again).”

Earlier this week, the watchdog group Public Citizen called for Sessions’ firing, saying his involvement meant that “we’ve just plunged into a constitutional crisis.”

“Sessions must be removed from office immediately. He violated his pledge to recuse himself from matters related to the Russia investigation,” Public Citizen’s president Robert Weissman said. “This is a test for America.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Click Here: collingwood magpies 2019 training guernsey

Read More