Month: September 2020

Home / Month: September 2020

With their passage of a deeply unpopular $1.5 trillion tax cut bill on Thursday, House Republicans did their part in “paving the way for the greatest transfer of wealth from regular people to the super-rich in modern American history,”—a move that sparked a flood of outrage from progressive activists and lawmakers who vowed to mobilize and do everything in their power to “kill the bill.”

“The grassroots resistance they’re about to experience will be just as intense as the tidal wave of opposition that repeatedly stopped the zombie Trumpcare bill.”
—Murshed Zaheed, CREDO”If we are going to stop Republicans from taking healthcare from millions and slashing Medicare to give tax cuts to the wealthy and large corporations, now is the time to stand up and fight back,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in a call to action that was echoed by many of the progressive groups that played a significant role in the fight against Trumpcare.

Now that the House bill has passed, “the fight now turns to the Senate, where the Trump tax scam has always faced much tougher odds,” noted CREDO political director Murshed Zaheed said in a statement.

As Common Dreams reported on Tuesday, Senate Republicans crammed a provision into their own tax bill that would strip healthcare from 13 million Americans—a fact opposition groups have used in recent days in an effort to galvanize grassroots forces.

“It is no surprise that Trump’s lapdogs in the Senate want to use the Trump tax scam to try to gut healthcare for millions of Americans,” Zaheed said, “but the grassroots resistance they’re about to experience will be just as intense as the tidal wave of opposition that repeatedly stopped the zombie Trumpcare bill. If the Senate manages to pass the Trump tax scam despite massive public opposition, we suspect many senators will come to regret it next year.”

Just ahead of the House vote on Thursday, the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) released an analysis that dealt yet another blow to the GOP’s insistence that their plan is primarily focused on providing relief to middle- and working-class Americans.

The Senate GOP plan—expected to hit the floor for a vote before Thanksgiving next week—will raise taxes on low-income Americans beginning in 2021, JCT found. More broadly, the Senate plan would sharply hike taxes on millions of families that earn less than $75,000 a year beginning in 2027.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Citing these numbers, the Washington Post‘s Paul Waldman wrote, “If you’re one of those white working-class voters who propelled Donald Trump into the presidency and gave Republicans total control of Washington, the GOP has a message for you: Sucker!”

By contrast, the wealthiest Americans—including President Donald Trump and his family—stand to gain massively from both the House and Senate plans. According to an NBC analysis published Thursday, Trump and his heirs would save more than a billion dollars if the House measure became law.

Click Here: Maori All Blacks Store

“The tax plan passed today by the House of Representatives is a flat giveaway to America’s richest households and corporations,” argued Josh Bivens of the Economic Policy Institute in a statement. “Most of the same people who cast this vote to deprive the government of tax revenue will now cynically pivot and start wringing their hands about the federal budget deficit, arguing that vital programs like Medicare and Medicaid must be slashed.”

“Disgusting,” concluded Fight for $15 on Twitter, “but the fight isn’t over. This is one of the worst pieces of legislation in history. Call your Senators and tell them to vote NO!”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

Just days before world leaders are set to gather in Bonn, Germany for the annual United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP23), tens of thousands of activists from across the globe kicked off a series of planned actions on Saturday by taking to the streets to demand an end to coal, denounce U.S. President Donald Trump’s climate denial, and highlight the necessity of moving toward 100 percent renewable energy as quickly as possible.

“This is a pivotal moment for global efforts to combat climate change,” 350.org, which helped organize the events set to take place through next week, noted in a statement. “Countries will either succumb to the forces of denial, like the Trump administration, or move ahead to a clean energy future that works for all.”

Click Here: cd universidad catolica

The stated aim of the COP23 talks—this year presided over by Fiji—is to “advance the aims and ambitions of the Paris Agreement and achieve progress on its implementation guidelines.”

But Trump’s decision to withdraw the U.S. from the agreement casts a “dark shadow” over the negotiations. As the New York Times reported Thursday, the Trump administration will attempt to use COP23 as a platform to “promote coal, natural gas, and nuclear energy” and argue that fossil fuels should “continue to play a central role in the energy mix”—despite the fact that the U.S. government’s own climate assessment, unveiled Friday, links fossil fuels to the warming of the climate.

So while Trump and his allies are “twisting themselves into pretzels to justify blocking national and international climate action,” environmentalists are working to place pressure on world leaders to forge ahead with ambitious goals that place people and the planet over the interests of oil giants.

“The wildfires, hurricanes and floods of these last few months show us that we don’t have time to play games of climate denial or greenwashing of dirty energy,” Cindy Wiesner, executive director of Grassroots Global Justice Alliance, said in a statement. “COP23 is an opportunity for world leaders to catch up to the solutions already coming from communities on the ground.”

“Countries will either succumb to the forces of denial, like the Trump administration, or move ahead to a clean energy future that works for all.” 
—350.org

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

With the small island nation Fiji presiding over the talks, particular attention is being drawn to the Pacific Island nations that are severely threatened by the extreme weather that results from climate change. Throughout COP23, Pacific Climate Warriors will demand that world leaders “kick the big polluters out of the climate talks,” “end the era of fossil fuels,” and “move to 100% renewable energy.”

“Putting a stop to coal and other forms of dirty energy is crucial in addressing the global climate emergency,” concluded Karin Nansen, chair of Friends of the Earth International. “We urge developed country governments to stop exploiting dirty energy now and to stop financing dirty energy projects at home and in developing countries.”

 

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

After President Donald Trump’s March for Life speech on Friday, in which he called for a nationwide 20-week abortion ban and touted his administration’s efforts to roll back reproductive rights and discrimination prevention measures in the euphemistic name of “religious liberty,” critics denounced Trump and Republicans for pushing an anti-child agenda.

In response to the president’s proclamations that he values children, reproductive rights advocates decried failures by the Republican-led Congress to approve long-term funding for the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) as well as moves by Trump and GOP lawmakers to use recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program as “bargaining chips” in legislative battles over immigration policy. 

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Introduced by Vice President Mike Pence as “the most pro-life president in American history,” Trump called on the Senate to pass a bill “misleadingly labeled as the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act,” which cleared the House in October. Advocates for reproductive rights have said the proposal is unpopular and unconstitutional, and would mostly notably impact low-income women of color. 

Trump also attacked the landmark Supreme Court Roe v. Wade ruling for enabling “permissive abortion laws,” and bragged about various ways his administration and Republicans in Congress have worked to limit access to reproductive care since he took office one year ago. 

As the president noted:

Dawn Laguens, Planned Parenthood’s executive vice president, said the move to allow states to withhold funding makes the Trump-Pence agenda “crystal clear.”

Click Here: Golf special

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

Brussels risks another shot at EU migration reform

September 25, 2020 | News | No Comments

Press play to listen to this article

Voiced by Amazon Polly

Are you a government that doesn’t want to take in asylum seekers who arrived in another EU country?

The European Commission has a proposal for you: You can help that country send home migrants whose asylum applications have been rejected instead.

This “sponsorship” scheme is among measures expected to feature in the Commission’s much-postponed migration reform plan, due to be presented on Wednesday, as Brussels ventures once more into one of the most sensitive policy issues in Europe — an issue that exposed deep divisions among EU countries in the crisis of 2015 and 2016.

This time around, the Commission is hoping it has found a formula with a so-called Migration Pact that will allow every country to claim victory. From Hungary to Italy, from Greece to Poland “they all should see their redlines” respected, said an EU official.

Among other planned features of the package is an effort to return more irregular migrants to their homeland, in part by appointing an EU coordinator for such returns. Returns have been a consistent problem for EU countries. In 2018, only 36 percent of those ordered to leave because their asylum application had been rejected had actually done so.

The Commission is also expected to propose beefed-up screening for new arrivals at the EU’s borders. And it will propose additional help for countries where many migrants first set foot on EU soil, which have long complained that they do not see enough solidarity from the EU and other member states.

Such countries — and others, such as Germany, which are the intended destination for many refugees and migrants — have insisted on a mandatory relocation scheme, under which asylum seekers would be distributed around the bloc. Such a scheme was at the heart of fierce disagreements during the last migration crisis, as Central and Eastern European governments flatly refused to take part in it.

The Commission’s new plan is an attempt to present new ideas while accepting that the faultlines among EU governments have barely changed since the crisis — as highlighted by three documents published by POLITICO in June. The papers, revealing the positions of various groups of governments, showed camps deeply entrenched in their respective views.

Click Here: cheap sydney roosters jersey

The new pact “is not about a binary choice between solidarity and responsibility, or between voluntary and mandatory relocation — we don’t want to pick up from where the discussion in 2015 left off,” the EU official said.

An obligation to take part in a solidarity scheme will be part of the proposal. That chimes with repeated comments by the two commissioners with responsibility for migration — Home Affairs Commissioner Ylva Johansson and Commission Vice President Margaritis Schinas — who have insisted that solidarity cannot be optional for EU members.

But that obligation will also come with options. That’s where the sponsorship scheme comes in. Instead of taking in a specific number of relocated asylum seekers, member states could instead help another country to return the equivalent number of irregular migrants to their home country.

A country that decides to sponsor returns would have eight months to implement them, and it would even be able to decide which nationality of migrants it wants to try to return. But if it fails to implement the returns, it would have to take in refugees instead — and it would not have a choice when it comes to their nationality.

The Commission also plans a revamp of the so-called Dublin regulation, under which the EU country in which an asylum seeker first arrives is responsible for processing that person’s asylum claim. While retaining that fundamental idea is expected to be among the possible options, the Commission is set to propose expanding the opportunities for asylum seekers with ties to other countries to get those countries to process their claims.

Once the Commission has set out its new plans — expected to take the form of 10 proposals, some of them for new legislation — its fate will be in the hands of EU member countries, with much at stake.

Schinas has warned multiple times that “Europe cannot allow itself to fail twice on migration.” The repercussions of failure last time included a surge in support for populists and the far right.

If this effort fails, a third attempt is unlikely — at least for some time to come. And when it comes, it may be a plan among Western European countries, exacerbating divisions in the EU with Central and Eastern Europe.

Such a failure would also leave Europe without a common policy on migration and a functioning asylum system when the number of people forcibly displaced due to war, persecution and human rights violations was 79.5 million last year, the highest number on record and almost 15 million more than in 2015.

Holder: 2018 vote crucial to combating gerrymandering

September 25, 2020 | News | No Comments

Former Attorney General Eric HolderEric Himpton HolderTrump official criticizes ex-Clinton spokesman over defunding police tweet Obama to speak about George Floyd in virtual town hall GOP group launches redistricting site MORE said Monday that the 2018 midterms are crucial to his efforts to combat gerrymandering.

During a talk at Georgetown University, Holder said his group, the National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC), is “not shy” about its goal of electing more Democrats.

“The thought is to elect people in 2018 who will serve generally four-year terms. These are the people who will be at the table, come ’20, ’21, and who will be responsible for the redistricting that’s [coming] after the 2020 census,” Holder said.

ADVERTISEMENT

The former Obama administration official, who has not ruled out a 2020 presidential bid, says his organization does not promote gerrymandering for either party. Holder described their efforts as “a partisan attempt at good government,” but said “Republicans are not going to sit and give up power.”

As an example of that “good government,” he cited Ralph Northam’s victory in Virginia last year, and how it came with an assurance from the new Democratic governor not to sign any redistricting legislation unless it came from an independent commission.  

“I’m confident,” Holder said, “You give me a fair fight, I’ll have a Democratic Congress. I’ll have Democratic legislatures.”

Gerrymandered maps, like the one recently struck down in Pennsylvania, he said, are “really inconsistent with our founding documents, inconsistent with the Constitution, inconsistent with a variety of statutes.”

Holder, 67, said the NDRC needs to “raise the consciousness” of people and show them how gerrymandered districts “have an impact on their day-to-day lives.”

He cited gun control and “these weird choice laws” as examples of how politicians in “safe districts” are made “susceptible to special interests.”

“If you’re a Republican from a gerrymandered district, then you don’t have to worry about the fact that, for instance, 97 percent of the American people [are] wanting background checks when it comes to gun sales,” he said.

“At the end of the day, this is all about the American people getting to have their voices heard, their votes count, and their representatives reflect what their desires are,” Holder said.

Click Here: camiseta rosario central

Former Democratic Rep. Mike Espy leads both Republican challengers in the race to replace retiring Sen. Thad CochranWilliam (Thad) Thad CochranEspy wins Mississippi Senate Democratic primary Bottom Line Mike Espy announces Mississippi Senate bid MORE (R-Miss.), according to a poll conducted by his campaign.

A poll conducted by Chism Strategies for Espy’s campaign found him leading with 34 percent of the vote, and Republicans Cindy Hyde-Smith and Chris McDaniel splitting the vote, according to the Clarion-Ledger.

Hyde-Smith, who was appointed by the governor to replace Cochran until the Nov. 6 special election, is in second place with 27 percent, followed by McDaniel, a conservative firebrand and state senator, with 21 percent.

ADVERTISEMENT

The special election to serve out the last two years of Cochran’s term will be a “jungle primary” where candidates from both parties compete in the same race. If no one gets more than 50 percent of the vote, the top two finishers advance to a runoff three weeks later.

Democrats believe Espy, who served in the Clinton administration as the country’s first African-American secretary of Agriculture, could mount a competitive run in the deep-red state.

Democrats haven’t won a Senate seat in Mississippi since 1982. Still, Democrats believe he’ll be able to mobilize black voters in a state where they make up more than a third of the voting-age population.

The poll was conducted prior to Tupelo Mayor Jason Shelton (D) jumping into the race on Tuesday, which will likely take away some support from Espy.

The poll is also good news for Hyde-Smith, the state’s Agriculture and Commerce commissioner, since national Republicans and the White House worried that she wouldn’t be able to defeat McDaniel. They feared she’d be vulnerable because she was registered as a Democrat until 2010.

McDaniel rankled the Republican establishment in 2014 when he came close to unseating Cochran in the primary. He was initially running against Sen. Roger WickerRoger Frederick WickerPrivate lawsuits are a necessary expedient in privacy legislation Bottom line GOP faces internal conflicts on fifth coronavirus bill MORE (R-Miss.), who’s up for reelection in 2018. But he switched races once Cochran’s seat opened up.

ADVERTISEMENT

Another candidate considering running in the special election is attorney Andy Taggart (R). Some strategists believe that a Taggart run would siphon away votes from Hyde-Smith.

The poll, which was conducted days after Hyde-Smith was tapped to fill the seat, surveyed 603 likely voters.

Click Here: cheap Cowboys jersey

National Democrats are spending big in key House districts ahead of next month’s California primaries, a last-minute scramble aimed at ensuring the party isn’t shut out of winnable races by the state’s unique election laws. 

California’s “jungle primary” system puts all candidates, regardless of party, in a single primary, with the top two vote-getters moving on to a general election. Democrats fear that crowded fields of Democratic candidates could split the party’s vote, allowing Republicans to take both general election slots in several races. 

In an effort to ensure a Democrat advances to the general election in crowded races, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) has booked more than $1 million in television and radio ads attacking Republican candidates across three southern California districts ahead of the June 5 primary. Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonWhite House accuses Biden of pushing ‘conspiracy theories’ with Trump election claim Biden courts younger voters — who have been a weakness Trayvon Martin’s mother Sybrina Fulton qualifies to run for county commissioner in Florida MORE won all three districts in the 2016 presidential election, making them prime pickup opportunities for Democrats. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The spending is only part of the plan — national Democrats have also made controversial moves to boost their own preferred candidates, as they look to winnow the candidate fields. 

But those moves have sparked frustration among some activists and candidates who want the national party to stay out. That frustration is compounded by the ugly nature of some primary fights, complicating Democratic efforts to ensure at least one Democrat advances to the general election in key races.

“I think everyone’s super anxious for what exactly happens,” said a Democratic strategist in California. “I think everyone’s hope is that Republicans stay home and don’t vote. If they do vote, it’s very likely Democrats get locked out.”

Democrats have been beating the drum for months about the perils of having too many candidates in California races. That anxiety has good grounding — in 2012, Pete AguilarPeter (Pete) Ray AguilarDozens of Democrats plan to vote remotely in a first for the House Biden rolls out over a dozen congressional endorsements after latest primary wins Biden rise calms Democratic jitters MORE (D), then a first-time candidate, came in third and was locked out of the general. In 2014, national Democrats made sure to get behind Aguilar early, helping ensure he won the seat that year.

Tensions over crowded fields bubbled to the surface at the California Democratic Party’s convention in February, when state party leaders made repeated calls for lower-tier candidates to consider dropping out so Democrats could coalesce behind leading challengers. Some candidates did drop out before the March filing deadline, but most key races still have crowded primary fields.

Some Democrats fear that, without intervention, the party’s concerns may be realized.

In an attempt to alleviate those concerns, the DCCC is escalating its spending three weeks out from the June primary — mostly targeting Republicans who are within reach of the second general election slot.

In the Los Angeles media market, the committee purchased $274,000 in cable and radio ads to target Republicans running for retiring GOP Rep. Ed RoyceEdward (Ed) Randall RoyceGil Cisneros to face Young Kim in rematch of 2018 House race in California The most expensive congressional races of the last decade Mystery surrounds elusive sanctions on Russia MORE’s seat. One ad attacks former state Sen. Bob Huff for supporting taxes hikes. The other spot targets Republican Shawn Nelson, a member of the Orange County Board of Supervisors, accusing him of hypocrisy over pensions.

The DCCC spent another $575,700 to attack Republican Scott Baugh, who’s emerged as a viable alternative for the seat already held by another Republican, Rep. Dana RohrabacherDana Tyrone RohrabacherDemocrat Harley Rouda advances in California House primary Lawyers to seek asylum for Assange in France: report Rohrabacher tells Yahoo he discussed pardon with Assange for proof Russia didn’t hack DNC email MORE. With various polls showing Baugh within reach of the second general election spot, Democrats are highlighting Baugh’s past indictment on several felony charges.

The DCCC also bought $524,400 on cable and broadcast in the San Diego media market, which will be aimed at one of the leading Republican candidates running for retiring GOP Rep. Darrell IssaDarrell Edward IssaGOP sues California over Newsom’s vote-by-mail order Conservative group files challenge to California vote-by-mail order New poll shows tight race in key California House race MORE’s district. The ads take aim at state Assemblyman Rocky Chavez for voting on tax increases — a clear attempt to hurt his standing among Republicans.

Following suit, two outside Democratic groups — Priorities USA Action and House Majority PAC — also launched a $270,000 digital ad campaign in those three districts on Tuesday, targeting the same Republicans.

Democrats see the spending as a key way to boost the party’s chances without actively campaigning for a preferred candidate. But Republicans are laughing off the new ads, arguing that the eventual Democratic nominees will go into the general hobbled by tough primaries.

“The DCCC is in full freak-out mode over the possibility of being locked out of ‘must have’ races for them,” said National Republican Congressional Committee spokesman Jesse Hunt. “They will spend millions of dollars just to try and drag their damaged candidates to the starting line of a runoff against a formidable Republican.”

All three races are high priorities for Democrats, which is why getting boxed out from any of the general elections could be catastrophic to the party’s chances of taking back the House this fall.

The races are also important for two high-powered Californians already in the House: Minority Leader Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiTrump on collision course with Congress over bases with Confederate names Black lawmakers unveil bill to remove Confederate statues from Capitol Pelosi: Georgia primary ‘disgrace’ could preview an election debacle in November MORE (D) and Majority Leader Kevin McCarthyKevin Owen McCarthyHouse Republicans hopeful about bipartisan path forward on police reform legislation Trump on collision course with Congress over bases with Confederate names McConnell: States should make decision on Confederate statues MORE (R), who are hyper-focused on the fight over the House majority with the Speaker’s gavel on the line.

The DCCC has also elevated certain candidates they believe are in the best position to make it through the primary, decisions that have, at times, become sources of friction between national and local Democrats.

The DCCC named lottery winner and veteran Gil Cisneros, running in the 39th District, and businessman Harley Rouda, running in the 48th District, to the “Red to Blue” program. The designation isn’t an official endorsement, but it offers key financial and organizational support to designated candidates.

The efforts to back the most viable Democratic candidates have opened new divisions in the party.

The race to succeed Royce, for example, has taken an ugly turn with a fight between Cisneros and his main opponent, Andy Thorburn, a health insurance executive backed by allies of Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersThe Hill’s 12:30 Report: Milley apologizes for church photo-op Harris grapples with defund the police movement amid veep talk Biden courts younger voters — who have been a weakness MORE (I-Vt.).

Both candidates have traded blows in recent weeks as tensions flare.

Last month, The Intercept published an allegation from Thorburn, who said Cisneros left him a brief voicemail threatening to “go negative.” Cisneros’s campaign pushed back against those claims, pointing to voice recognition analysis it commissioned that suggested Cisneros’s was not the voice on the recording.

And the two candidates have also launched dueling websites panning their rival. Cisneros’s camp is out with a website framing Thorburn as a tax-evader, while Thorburn’s camp has a site calling Cisneros a gun lover.

Click Here: Fjallraven Kanken Art Spring Landscape Backpacks

Meanwhile, in the district currently represented by Rohrabacher, the DCCC’s move has put them at odds with the California Democratic Party, whose delegates and activists voted to endorse stem cell researcher Hans Keirstead at the convention in February.

Rouda and Keirstead have both released internal polls that show the two Democrats tied for second place along with Baugh.

State party chairman Eric Bauman released a statement following Rouda’s designation as “Red to Blue,” warning that the “DCCC should tread carefully in openly supporting a different candidate.”

“California Democratic activists value our independence and the grassroots nature of our endorsement process,” Bauman said. “Decisions that undercut the independence or our endorsed candidates have the potential to be extraordinarily counterproductive.”

Democrats have been the most hands-off in Issa’s 49th District, with the DCCC so far expressing no preferences.

Democrats have four candidates, each of whom has their own base of support. Marine Corps veteran Doug Applegate, the 2016 Democratic nominee, has led some polls. Mike Levin, an environmental attorney, came close to scoring the California Democratic Party’s endorsement at the February convention.

Sara Jacobs, a first-time candidate and former nonprofit CEO, has gained traction over the past couple months. EMILY’s List endorsed her, and its super PAC, Women Vote, has spent nearly $1.1 million on advertising and mailers.

Democrats acknowledge that the race still remains wide open in the final weeks of the primary. But it’s likely that Republicans could face a shutout threat of their own in the fight for Issa’s seat, with more than one credible Republican candidate in the race.

Chavez has led several polls, but his support from former GOP Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has kept him open to attacks from the right. Diane Harkey, a member of the State Board of Equalization backed by Issa, has crept up in the polls. San Diego County Board of Supervisors Chairwoman Kristin Gaspar, meanwhile, will meet with President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE about California’s “sanctuary state” laws.

As the messy primaries drag on, Democrats warn that the party must prioritize general election unity to have a shot at taking back the House.

“If we are going to stop Donald Trump, we can fight each other now, but we better embrace each other the day after these primaries,” former Rep. Steve IsraelSteven (Steve) J. IsraelThe Hill’s Campaign Report: Bad polling data is piling up for Trump Biden faces new hurdle: Winning as front-runner The Hill’s Campaign Report: Biden on the cusp of formally grasping the Democratic nomination MORE (D-N.Y.), a former two-time DCCC chairman, told The Hill in a recent interview. “If we go into this general election with grudges, we are handing the majority to Republicans.”

Tens of thousands of people rallied in protest on Saturday night in Tel Aviv, Israel against Israeli government corruption and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu who is under criminal investigation over allegations of abuse of office.

Saturday’s “March of shame” protest was prompted by a draft law expected to be ratified by parliament next week, which would bar police from publishing its findings in two investigations of Netanyahu. If charged, Netanyahu would come under heavy pressure to resign.

The protest was by far the largest of now weekly anti-corruption protests sparked by corruption allegations against the far right-wing Prime Minister Netanyahu. Many more protesters also gathered in the cities of Haifa and Rosh Pina.

The Jerusalem Post reported:

Standing near the historic site where David Ben-Gurion declared the establishment of the State of Israel, Hagai Peled and his wife, Tushia, said they traveled from Hadera to attend the protest.

Click Here: Cardiff Blues Store

“It’s almost like a monarchy here now,” said Hagai, amid drumbeats and chants of “Stop the corruption!” “What’s going on with our government is going to silence the voices of everyone here in Israel so that no one can complain or say anything, so we want to protest,” he continued.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

The Republican-controlled FCC voted along party lines on Thursday to repeal net neutrality, but open internet defenders are urging the public to not be swayed by the proliferation of “net neutrality is officially dead” headlines—the fight is “not over,” they say.

“The backlash to the FCC’s attack on the Internet has reached a boiling point.”
—Fight for the Future

Just hours after the FCC’s vote, the coalition of activist groups behind Team Internet and BattlefortheNet.com announced the launch of “a massive internet-wide campaign” calling on members of Congress to overturn the FCC’s move by passing a Resolution of Disapproval under the Congressional Review Act (CRA), which only requires a simple majority in the House and Senate.

The CRA gives Congress the power to review newly passed regulations and overturn them through a joint resolution.

“Think of it as a double negative,” explained Free Press’s Dana Floberg. “If we repeal Pai’s repeal, we could end up right back where we started—with strong Net Neutrality rules.

Fight for the Future (FFTF), one of the groups that helped launch the campaign to nullify Pai’s plan, said in a statement on Thursday that “lawmakers cannot hide from their constituents on this issue.”

“The backlash to the FCC’s attack on the Internet has reached a boiling point,” FFTF observed. “Now every member of Congress will have to go on the record and decide whether to stand up for the free and open internet or face the political consequences of awakening its wrath in an election year.”

As Common Dreams has reported, the American public overwhelmingly supports net neutrality. FFTF argues that now, more than ever, Americans must place pressure on their representatives to do the same.

“The internet has given ordinary people more power than ever before,” FFTF concluded. “We’re going to fight tooth and nail to make sure no one takes that power away.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Click Here: All Blacks Rugby Jersey

Read More

As Republicans and President Donald Trump turn toward the new year with destruction on their minds, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) joined a chorus of voices in expressing the urgent need to reach beyond merely resisting the right’s agenda and articulate an inspiring alternative that will sweep progressives into positions of power.

“Empty platitudes and anti-Trump rhetoric is not enough to win seats in Congress. In 2018, Democrats need a bold economic vision which includes investing in education, healthcare, and opportunities for every American.”
—Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.)

“Here is a New Year’s resolution I hope you will share with me,” Sanders wrote on Twitter just before midnight on Sunday. “In 2018, we will not only intensify the struggle against Trumpism, we will increase our efforts to spread the progressive vision in every corner of the land.”

While the content of this progressive vision may have seemed unclear a year ago, 2017 saw support for concrete proposals long favored by the left—from single-payer healthcare to a $15 minimum wage—soar in the midst of Republican efforts to strip healthcare from tens of millions of Americans and roll back the rights of workers nationwide.

These right-wing efforts forced progressives to play defense—often successfully—for much of the year, but victories in 2018 will require a rallying cry more galvanizing than “resist” and more expansive than “not Trump,” advocacy groups and progressive lawmakers argued.

“Empty platitudes and anti-Trump rhetoric is not enough to win seats in Congress,” said Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who in 2017 emerged as one of the Democratic Party’s most powerful critics of corporate power. “In 2018, Democrats need a bold economic vision which includes investing in education, healthcare, and opportunities for every American.”

If surging membership experienced by grassroots organizations like Our Revolution, Indivisible, and the Democratic Socialists of America—as well as increased engagement in mass demonstrations across the country—is any evidence, the public is eager to hear such an ambitious message. As Common Dreams reported throughout 2017, millions of Americans mobilized from the day Trump took the Oath of Office to the day he signed the GOP’s $1.5 trillion tax cuts into law not just to denounce Trumpism, but also to call for something better.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

“The explosion of civic energy from a vast swathe of Americans is simply breathtaking,” observed Ben Wikler, Washington director of MoveOn.org. “It suggests that not only some of Trump’s excesses may yet be curbed—but that a profound renewal may be possible.”

“In the face of the most corrupt, conflict-ridden president in American history, we cannot stand by and let corporate executives and political lackeys take over.”
—Public Citizen

An essential element of achieving this renewal will be both wresting control of Congress from Republicans and replacing them with progressives committed to sweeping changes to a status quo that has produced staggering inequality, persistent poverty, and a political system dominated by corporate cash.

This won’t be an easy task: To win control of the House, Democrats need a net gain of 24 seats in 2018. In the Senate, they need a net gain of two.

But with 2017 in the rear view, progressives expressed confidence that Trump’s deep unpopularity combined with a widespread desire for progressive, systemic change will be enough to achieve the kind of electoral “tsunami” previewed in Virginia and elsewhere just a few months ago.

Click Here: camisetas de futbol baratas

“In the face of the most corrupt, conflict-ridden president in American history, we cannot stand by and let corporate executives and political lackeys take over,” the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen declared on Twitter. “We must act together. And we must act strategically. 2018 is the year the people fight back like never before.”

Wikler of MoveOn.org concluded that while “many of the worst” envisioned consequences of the Trump presidency could still come to pass, the growth of grassroots energy over the past year offers a glimpse of an alternative future that is within reach.

“I’m ending this year still with the sense of dread about what’s possible—but also with a great sense of gratitude for the efforts of all of the people working to not only avert disaster, but to build something better,” Wikler wrote. “Here’s to 2018.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More