Month: September 2020

Home / Month: September 2020

As families continue to grieve and hold funerals for the 17 victims of the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, in Parkland, Fla., students and educators are calling for a nationwide day of action including school walkouts to protest lawmakers’ deadly inaction on gun control legislation.

The day set for the actions is April 20, which will be the 19th anniversary of the massacre at Columbine High School.

The Twitter account National School Walkout, which was started Friday, declares, “We are the students, we are the victims, we are change.”

The April 20 walkout, it says, will be “a polite, passionate, plea for peace.”

A Change.org petition, which has gathered over 6,100 signatures as of this writing, and is linked to the Twitter account, says, “There has been too much complacency on the part of politicians when it comes to gun violence. The time to act is now!”

“The violence of guns is being performed in our schools and our communities. Not the Senate floor. As the future of America, it is time for teenagers to speak their minds and put their frustration into action,” it adds. It also encourages people to sign on to take part in the action, saying, “Nothing has changed since Columbine, let us start a movement that lets the government know the time for change is now.”

The students’ call-to-action comes days after David Berliner, an educational psychologist and Regents’ Professor of Education Emeritus at Arizona State University, issued a call for a national teachers’ strike if lawmakers continue their failure to enact “sane gun laws.”

Berliner’s call, which he sent in a message to education historian Diane Ravitch, states, in part, “Almost all of America’s 3 million teachers—nurturers and guardians of our youth—want sensible gun laws. They deserve that. But they have to be ready to exert the power they have by walking out of their schools if they do not get what they want. They have to exert the reputational power that 3 million of our most admired voters have. Neither the NRA nor their legislative puppets will be able stand up to that.”

He originally said the day should be May 1, May Day, but after being flooded with responses including from the American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association, he explained to Slate the day got switched to April 20.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

“April 20,” he told Slate, “will become the day on which teachers can say, ‘No. You will never ever be elected again if you don’t pass sensible laws, and there are all sorts of things that can be done that don’t violate the Constitution.’ I’ve just had enough.”

A web page calling for pledges to commit to an April 20 action and sponsored by the Network for Public Education, the American Federation of Teachers, the National Education Association, and other organizations says, “The failure to enact rational laws around the purchase of guns that are designed for mass shootings is inexcusable. The time to act is now. Every child deserves to learn in a school that is safe.”

A separate nationwide walkout event sponsored by organizers of the Women’s March is scheduled for March 14. Rather than a day-long event, that action is scheduled to take place “for 17 minutes at 10am across every time zone … to protest Congress’ inaction to do more than tweet thoughts and prayers in response to the gun violence plaguing our schools and neighborhoods.”

On Twitter the National School Walkout explains, “For those of you concerned on the separate dates of our protest and @womensmarch ‘s. We agree that there is strength in numbers. That is why we have contacted them and are waiting for their response. We all would prefer a full day to 17 minutes.”

Among the students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School countering lawmakers’ vacuous “thoughts and prayers” and instead making passionate pleas for action on gun legislation in the wake of the Parkland shooting is 17-year-old David Hogg.

Click Here: Cardiff Blues Store

“I don’t want this to be another mass shooting. I want this to be the last mass shooting,” the senior told MSNBC. “Everybody is getting used to this, and that’s not ok. … We’re habituating to this. And what happens when you do that is children are dying and they will continue to die unless we stop it, stand up, and take action.”

“We don’t need ideas. We need action,” Hogg continued. “We need action from our elected officials and we need action from the civil public because without that, this is going to happen again.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

Students, parents, and teachers walked out of thousands of high schools across the country on Wednesday to demand legislative action to address gun violence in the United States.

The national “Enough” walkout is part of a student-led movement to call for gun control reform after 17 people were killed at a high school in Parkland, Florida last month—just the latest in a series of deadly mass shootings. Students will also head to Washington, D.C. for the “March for Our Lives” on March 24 and are planning a second nationwide walkout for April 20, the 19th anniversary of the Columbine High School shooting.

Using the hashtags #Enough, #NationalSchoolWalkout, and #NationalWalkoutDay, protesters and journalists shared on social media photos, videos, and anecdotes from Wednesday’s demonstrations.

Students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School—the site of last month’s massacre—filed out into the football field for a 17-minute moment of silence.

Click Here: All Blacks Rugby Jersey

In Atlanta, about 600 students at Booker T. Washington High School left their classrooms to “take a knee” in a silent protest, taking inspiration from a number of famous athletes who have protested police brutality and institutionalized racism in recent months.

Many students in New England, including in Boston and Portland, Maine, attended protests despite their schools being closed after heavy snow on Tuesday and Wednesday. Boston students marched to the State House to demand their legislators enact tougher gun control laws.

In Granada Hills, California, students and teachers arranged themselves on the football field at Granada Hills Charter High School to spell out the word “ENOUGH,” while a gong sounded 17 times for the 17 people who were killed in Parkland.

At Columbine High School in Colorado, the site of an infamous mass shooting in 1999, students walked out and released balloons in memory of those killed in Florida.

Students in New York City gathered outside one of President Donald Trump’s hotels, and shouted: “Hey hey, NRA, how many kids did you kill today?”

Rosa Rodriquez, a sophomore at Sayreville War Memorial High School in New Jersey—which reportedly threatened to suspend participants—was interviewed by local media about being the only student from her school to walk out. 

And Justin Blackman, a student at Wilson Preparatory Academy in Wilson, North Carolina, also walked out by himself to mark the day.

As Democratic members of Congress joined students outside the U.S. Capitol Building in D.C., the demonstrators greeted Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) with cheers. Addressing the crowd over chants of “Bernie, Bernie,” Sanders said: “I am absolutely delighted and proud that you are here today. What you are doing is of national significance. You’re leading this country in the right direction. Thank you all.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

President Donald Trump has shown little concern for civilian casualties overseas during his tenure as commander-in-chief, and according to a report published Thursday by the Washington Post, he actually wishes there were more of them.

“Yes, it was a campaign promise. A sociopathic one that would clearly be a war crime, which is why even US military and intelligence officials—hardly shy about war crimes—were mortified and said they would never follow such a demented order.”
—Glenn Greenwald, The Intercept

Reacting to footage of a drone strike in Syria in which the CIA waited until the target was separated from his family before firing, Trump reportedly asked, “Why did you wait?”

While Trump’s question was immediately denounced as a display of “actual sociopathy,” it was perfectly in line with his campaign rhetoric insisting that the best way to combat terrorism is to “take out” the alleged perpetrators’ families.

Click Here: camisetas de futbol baratas

“We’re fighting a very politically correct war,” Trump lamented during an interview on Fox News in December of 2015. “And the other thing is with the terrorists, you have to take out their families. When you get these terrorists, you have to take out their families.”

Acknowledging that Trump made the deliberate killing of civilians part of his campaign platform, The Intercept‘s Glenn Greenwald noted that actually carrying out such a policy “would clearly be a war crime, which is why even U.S. military and intelligence officials—hardly shy about war crimes—were mortified and said they would never follow such a demented order.”

As Common Dreams has reported, civilian casualties overseas increased dramatically during Trump’s first year in the White House.

In an analysis published in January, the watchdog group Airwars estimated that civilian deaths from bombs dropped by the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq and Syria in 2017 rose 215 percent from than the previous year.

“This unprecedented death toll coincided with the start of the Trump presidency, and suggested in part that policies aimed at protecting civilians had been scaled back under the new administration,” Airwars concluded.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

Days after the Senate Judiciary Committee released a transcript of its interview with Donald Trump, Jr. regarding his meeting with a Russian lawyer during the 2016 presidential campaign, new reports surfaced suggesting that the president’s son met with other foreign entities to discuss the election.

The New York Times  reported Saturday that Trump, Jr. met with George Nader, a businessman who was representing the crown princes of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in August 2016. Nader reportedly informed Trump, Jr. that both countries were “eager to help his father win election as president.”

The report marks the first indication that foreign entities other than Russia may have sought to influence the election, working closely with the Trump campaign.

Erik Prince—brother of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, advisor to the Trump transition team, and former head of the private military company Blackwater—apparently arranged the meeting, and an Israeli “social media specialist” named Joel Zamel presented information about his company’s ability to give Trump’s campaign an “edge” on social media.

As with Trump, Jr.’s 2016 meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, the president’s son’s response to the report of his meeting with Nader, Prince, and Zamel has focused on his claim that nothing came of the encounter.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

“Prior to the 2016 election, Donald Trump Jr. recalls a meeting with Erik Prince, George Nader, and another individual who may be Joel Zamel,” Alan Futerfas, a lawyer for Trump, Jr., said in a statement. “They pitched Mr. Trump Jr. on a social media platform or marketing strategy. He was not interested and that was the end of it.”

According to the Times report, “two people familiar with the meetings said that Trump campaign officials did not appear bothered by the idea of cooperation with foreigners.”

In his investigation into the Trump campaign, Special Counsel Robert Mueller has reportedly questioned  Nader in recent weeks and has sought information about any attempts by the UAE to financially support Trump’s run. Nader has also been questioned about his role in arranging a meeting between Prince and a Kremlin-connected businessman in January 207.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Click Here: Golf special

Read More

Mercedes technical director James Allison has come up with a novel idea to spice up F1, although it’s one that doesn’t stand a hell’s chance of ever getting adopted.

From drastic changes to the technical regulations to the controversial concept of reverse grids, Formula 1’s chiefs are sparing no effort to try and boost the show on the track.

But when it comes to provocative ideas, the typically analytical and rational Allison in not one to be outdone.

    Kubica irritated by constant criticism of Formula 1

In a recent ‘Ask Me Anything’ video published on Mercedes’ YouTube channel, the brilliant engineer was asked what single technical or sporting rule he would change given the opportunity to do so.

“First off, I wouldn’t really muck around in the technical regulations, it’s a bit of a mug’s game,” Allison explained.

“It’s valuable if you want to make the car safer or if you want to speed them up or slow them down.

“But it’s really really difficult to make a technical change that will materially effect the way in which the cars race against one another.”

Allison then switched to a mischievous grin while putting his eloquent tongue in his cheek.

“Sporting regulations, well that’s a very different prospect,” he added. “There, I would make one change.

“Everyone around me would probably hate me for it – I know Toto would definitely not support it – but I would say, do away completely with the blue flags!

“It would make the races an absolute nightmare for a fast car because as we came up to lap people they wouldn’t get out of our way, we would have to fight our way through them.

“That would make every race interesting all way through the race.

Click Here: Golf special

“It would also mean that teams would have to forge alliances with one another, and where you would have to be very very nervous of teams that you’ve fallen out with which would make it politically incredibly intriguing as well.

“So, such a change would be disastrous for us but probably really interesting in the long term for the sport.”

Be bold F1. Give it a try!

Gallery: The beautiful wives and girlfriends of F1 drivers

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

GOP Senate primary heats up in Montana

September 20, 2020 | News | No Comments

Montana’s GOP Senate primary is ramping up in the final stretch, as candidates jockey to face Sen. Jon TesterJonathan (Jon) TesterSenate confirms Trump’s watchdog for coronavirus funds Montana barrels toward blockbuster Senate fight The 10 Senate seats most likely to flip MORE (D) in November.

State Auditor Matt Rosendale, who was recruited by the GOP after several top-tier contenders passed on the race, is still seen as the front-runner, with national outside groups putting up more than $1.8 million to help him across the finish line in the June 5 primary.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Rosendale has also been the biggest target for attacks from his primary opponents, who have accused him of being a carpetbagger because he moved to Montana two decades ago. Rosendale’s rivals have also dubbed him a career politician and seized on his opposition to the death penalty to paint him as not conservative enough for the nomination.

Between those attacks and limited polling in the four-candidate race, strategists on both sides of the aisle see an unpredictable primary. But there’s a big prize awaiting whoever survives the June primary — a match-up with Tester, who has drawn the ire of President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE after Tester helped to sink his nominee to lead the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

Trump won the state by 20 points in 2016 and has taken to frequently attacking Tester — providing whoever wins the Republican nomination with an easy chance to tie themselves to Trump.

“Up until a few weeks ago, this primary in Montana was really, really sleepy, there wasn’t a lot going on, not a lot of activity on the airwaves,” said a GOP operative following the race. “It’s pretty much wide open.”

A handful of crowded GOP primaries have turned contentious this cycle, as Republicans fight for the right to face a number of vulnerable Senate Democrats. But Montana has mostly flown under the radar, with the GOP candidates focused instead on elevating their profiles and attacking Tester.

Rosendale, who previously served as majority leader in the state Senate, has mostly set his sights on the general election fight. His first ad featured his wife giving him a haircut while he touted his conservative record of cutting spending in the state. And he has consolidated support from national conservative groups, Illinois GOP mega-donor Richard Uihlein and GOP Sens. Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote The Hill’s Morning Report – Trump’s public standing sags after Floyd protests GOP senators introduce resolution opposing calls to defund the police MORE (Texas), Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulRand Paul introduces bill to end no-knock warrants Louisville passes ‘Breonna’s Law’ banning no-knock warrants Rand Paul aide joins Trump campaign, RNC fundraising group MORE (Ky.) and Mike LeeMichael (Mike) Shumway LeeSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Senate headed for late night vote amid standoff over lands bill Hillicon Valley: Facebook employees speak up against content decisions | Trump’s social media executive order on weak legal ground | Order divides conservatives MORE (Utah).

“Generally in a Republican primary, if you are conservative enough and spend the most money … that’s generally a pretty good path to victory,” the GOP operative said.

But that dynamic has shifted in the final weeks now that three of the four candidates — Rosendale, retired District Court Judge Russ Fagg and businessman Troy Downing — have started buying ad space and launching attacks on one another.

Rosendale is facing some of the same residency attacks that dogged him when he came in third in the 2014 GOP primary for Montana’s at-large House seat. Rosendale moved to Montana from Maryland in the 2000s, but his closest rival, Fagg, has used Rosendale’s contributions from out-of-state donors and the fact that Rosendale isn’t a native Montanan to paint him as an outsider to the state.

“A lot of the attacks that are getting levied at Rosendale I think have been leaving some marks,” said a Montana Republican familiar with the race, noting that the negative attention has come from Republicans and Democrats alike.

Fagg, who regularly brings up his status as a fourth-generation Montanan, has gained ground in the primary. GOP strategists describe Fagg’s support as coming from the state’s “old school establishment,” with endorsements from former governors and congressmen.

Fagg has turned up the heat on Rosendale at both debates and on the airwaves in the final stretch of the primary.

The former judge has targeted Rosendale most recently over the most noteworthy policy divide among the GOP candidates: the death penalty.

In a TV ad earlier this month, Fagg highlighted his support of the death penalty “for illegal aliens that murder.” His campaign slammed Rosendale for opposing capital punishment, even as an overwhelming majority of Montana Republicans support the death penalty.

Rosendale defended his position, pointing to his Catholic faith for why he doesn’t support the death penalty.

While the Club for Growth has mainly spent on ads boosting Rosendale, the conservative group has now gone after Fagg with a $632,000 TV ad buy attacking his judicial record. The ad accuses him of giving a lighter sentence to a defendant who admitted to domestic abuse in 2013.

Fagg pushed backed on what he called “disingenuous tactics,” arguing “out-of-state dark money groups are looking to buy this election for an out-of-state candidate.”

Republicans say while Rosendale still likely has the edge, Fagg has been able to leverage his role as a judge to drum up excitement among base voters who are attracted to Trump’s law-and-order message.

“He’s done a good job as capitalizing on his position as a judge,” said the Montana Republican strategist. “The political environment largely dominated by Trump is very much focused on border issues, illegal immigration.”

The battle between Rosendale and Fagg could create an opening for another candidate.

Downing, who served two combat tours in Afghanistan, has stayed out of the fray so far. He’s sought to frame himself as a political outsider in the mold of Trump. And he’s highlighted his military experience since Montana has the third-highest percentage of veterans per capita in the U.S.

He’s earned notable endorsements, including backing from Lola Zinke, the wife of former Montana congressman and current Interior Secretary Ryan ZinkeRyan Keith ZinkeOvernight Energy: Trump officials may pursue offshore drilling after election, report says | Energy regulators to delay projects pending appeals | EPA union calls for ‘moratorium’ on reopening plans Trump administration could pursue drilling near Florida coast post-election: report Trump to make it easier for Alaska hunters to kill wolf pups and bear cubs: report MORE, and Michael Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser now awaiting sentencing after pleading guilty for lying to the FBI.

Flynn was slated to campaign for Downing but had to postpone the rally.

Downing has poured in more than $1 million of his own money into the race, while Fagg and Rosendale have raised the most from individual donations.

Montana political observers also haven’t counted out state Sen. Al Olszewski, a doctor who has locked up a considerable amount of support from the party’s grass roots. Some Republicans believe he can peel off some support from Rosendale, since those voters would otherwise naturally gravitate to the state auditor.

They also note that Olszewski is the only candidate from northwest Montana, while the others will likely split the area around Billings.

The eventual Republican nominee will square off against Tester and a Green Party candidate, who could siphon away some of Tester’s more liberal supporters.

Trump has vowed to exact revenge on Tester, the top Democrat on the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, who circulated a memo about misconduct allegations against then-VA secretary nominee Ronny Jackson. Jackson denied the accusations, but eventually withdrew his nomination.

While it remains to be seen how heavily Trump will get involved in Montana’s Senate race, Democrats are hoping Tester’s ability to win tough races — as well as his prominent position on the veterans committee — can carry him through another tough election.

Matt McKenna, who worked on Tester’s 2006 and 2012 campaigns, said that while the dispute with Trump “matters,” he believes it could “helpfully shine a light on an issue that is probably the best one for him. He’s spent 12 years amassing this record of helping veterans.”

But in a deep-red state that Trump won easily in 2016, GOP strategists believe the president’s focus on Montana could be a huge boon — even if an underfunded candidate wins the GOP primary.

“If Donald Trump follows through on his threat to face down with Jon Tester, depending on how often and if he does it effectively, I don’t think it’ll matter which Republican is running,” said the Montana Republican strategist.

Click Here: cheap INTERNATIONAL jersey

Click:block making machine

A significantly greater number of Democrats than Republicans say they believe the country would be better off with more female elected officials, according to a NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll released Thursday.

Eighty-seven percent of Democrats polled say they thought the country would benefit with more women holding elected office, while only 10 percent disagree with the sentiment. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Only 49 percent of Republicans say they believed the country would be better off with more elected women, while 38 percent say they do not agree. 

Democratic women have experienced a slew of primary victories leading up to November’s midterms. 

Click Here: Bape Kid 1st Camo Ape Head rompers

In May, former George state House Democratic Leader Stacey Abrams became the first black woman to receive a gubernatorial nomination, while former Marine pilot Amy McGrath won her primary race for a Kentucky House seat over an mayor backed by national Democrats. 

Republicans, meanwhile, have seen a surge in the number of women running in House races: 103 this cycle, compared to only 48 in 2016.

The NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll was conducted on June 1-4, among 900 registered voters. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.3 percentage points. 

 

NJ governor rules out endorsing Cuomo in New York

September 20, 2020 | News | No Comments

New Jersey’s Democratic governor will not weigh in on New York’s gubernatorial race, shutting down the possibility of endorsing Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s reelection bid.

“We’re not getting involved in that,” Gov. Phil Murphy told reporters at a press conference on Tuesday when asked whether he backed Cuomo or progressive challenger actress Cynthia Nixon in the New York governor’s race.

“I’ve never met Ms. Nixon, but I’ve watched her on television as a performer. I have a fair amount of interaction, as you can imagine, with Gov. Cuomo, and our teams have a fair amount of interaction together,” he added, according to the New Jersey Globe. “That’s one we’re going to observe and stay out of.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Murphy’s refusal to endorse either candidate could be a move to avoid any possible political tensions down the line.

If he backs Cuomo, a fellow Democrat, Murphy runs the risk of isolating the progressive voters that have emerged as a key part of his coalition. Endorsing Nixon could exacerbate tensions with Cuomo.

Murphy has found himself at odds with Cuomo over a push to fill the deputy executive director position at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.

That position was eliminated in 2015 following a scandal in which access lanes to the George Washington Bridge were closed in an effort to retaliate against a New Jersey mayor who did not endorse the reelection bid of the state’s then-Gov. Chris Christie (R).

Murphy previously said he planned to reinstate the position. But Cuomo has pushed back on that plan, arguing that eliminating the post was necessary to reform the embattled Port Authority after the so-called Bridgegate scandal.

Polls suggest that Cuomo is likely to defeat Nixon in New York’s state Democratic primary in September.

But the former “Sex and the City” actress has sought to rally support among progressives, who received a boost last month when Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-N.Y.), the No. 4 House Democrat, was shockingly defeated in a primary race against Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a progressive first-time candidate.

Click Here: Fjallraven Kanken Art Spring Landscape Backpacks

Even a transatlantic flight to the United Kingdom wasn’t enough on Wednesday for Canadian Prime Minster Justin Trudeau to dodge the mounting opposition to the Trans Mountain pipeline in his home country.

Dozens of climate activists with Greenpeace staged a protest in the morning outside the Canadian High Commission in London, where they erected a fake, 30-meter (98-foot) pipeline emblazoned with the label “Crudeau Oil.” The activists also unfurled banners from the building that read “Crudeau Oil HQ.”

Trudeau is in London on Wednesday for the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting. The campaigners say that while Trudeau may be using his European trip to tout his country’s “ambitions for fighting climate change,” his continued insistence that the pipeline “will be built” proves that his supposed support for the climate rings hollow.

Walking out of Canada House, Trudeau gave the group a thumbs up and said, “It’s a pleasure to see you.” One of the protesters said, “Climate leaders don’t build pipelines, Mr Trudeau.”

Referring to Kinder Morgan’s pipeline, Greenpeace UK oil campaigner Sara Ayech said, “Trudeua’s government is planning a huge oil pipeline across Indigenous lands to take the highly polluting tar sands to global markets.”

“Tar sands are the dirtiest fossil fuel on the planet, far more polluting than coal,” she added. “Building this pipeline would make Trudeau’s claimed climate leadership a laughing stock.”

She went on to accuse the prime minister of “risking the health of Canada’s rivers and coast, the water supply, and livelihoods of many indigenous people, and undermining the credibility of the Paris climate agreement, all to keep some struggling oil companies in profit.”

First Nations communities, the province of British Columbia and its cities of Vancouver, Burnaby, and Victoria, as well as mulitple other B.C. municipalities, are all opposed to the pipeline. The U.S. state of Washington is also against the project.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

Underscoring the importance of protecting net neutrality at the national level rather than relying entirely on state-led efforts, Verizon, AT&T, and other massive telecom companies are threatening to “aggressively challenge” states and municipalities that attempt to establish their own open internet protections in the wake of the GOP-controlled FCC’s vote to repeal net neutrality last December.

In a blog post on Monday, Jonathan Spalter of USTelecom—a lobbying group chaired by executives of large telecom companies—argued against state-level net neutrality laws on the grounds that the U.S. needs “one consistent set of national and permanent consumer protections.”

Click Here: collingwood magpies 2019 training guernsey

“State lawmakers only decided to enforce net neutrality at the local level after ISPs convinced the FCC to abandon its nationwide oversight of net neutrality.”
—Jon Brodkin, Ars Technica

But as Ars Technica‘s Jon Brodkin notes, Spalter conveniently ignores the fact that “the U.S. did have a nationwide net neutrality standard that prohibited ISPs from blocking, throttling, or prioritizing Internet content in exchange for payment,” and “that standard was bitterly opposed by USTelecom and other broadband industry groups.”

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

After unsuccessfully attempting to overturn the 2015 net neutrality protections in court, “USTelecom eventually got its way after Republican Ajit Pai was appointed FCC chairman by President Trump; Pai led a 3-2 vote to kill the rules,” Brodkin adds. “State lawmakers only decided to enforce net neutrality at the local level after ISPs convinced the FCC to abandon its nationwide oversight of net neutrality.”

While open internet advocates have celebrated recent moves by states like California, Washington, and more than a dozen others to protect net neutrality from Pai’s repeal plan, they have also warned that these efforts are ultimately insufficient to shield the web from corporate manipulation. In order to do so, advocates and experts argue, Congress must step in an pass a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution to overturn Pai’s new rules.

In the Senate, the CRA needs just one more Republican vote to pass. The resolution then must make it through the House, where it will need 218 votes. The deadline for Congress to pass the CRA is April 23.

“Thankfully states like California are stepping up, but Congress needs to follow suit and support the CRA to restore protections for all,” Evan Greer, campaign director at Fight for the Future, said in a statement earlier this month.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More