Author: GETAWAYTHEBERKSHIRES

Home / Author: GETAWAYTHEBERKSHIRES

Briatore: Ecclestone ousting was inelegant

November 27, 2019 | News | No Comments

Flavio Briatore, a close friend and business partner of Bernie Ecclestone, believes the supremo’s exit from Formula 1 last week was conducted in a harsh and inelegant style.

The flamboyant Italian and former F1 team manger, who was banned indefinitely from the sport by the FIA following the infamous ‘crashgate’ episode which took place at Singapore in 2008, was critical of Liberty Media’s handling of Ecclestone’s dismissal.

“The whole thing was very inelegant,” Britore told the Gazetta dello Sport.

Click Here: New Zealand rugby store

“Everybody know I’m close to Bernie, and we shared the same vision of Formula 1. Berne enabled many people to become successful in the sport and even famous, even people who didn’t deserve it.”

  • ‘Ecclestone’s tough approach taught me a lot’, says Piquet

Briatore praised however the arrival of Ross Brawn at the helm, as F1’s sporting director, believing the sport will be in good hands

“I worked with Ross for eight years,” added the Italian.

“He’s a great engineer, and a great person. But he’ll have to make sure that everyone moves in the right direction, and work towards reducing costs.”

GALLERY: F1 drivers’ wives and girlfriends

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Williams to test 2017-focused wing again in Mexico

November 27, 2019 | News | No Comments

Williams will test a special front wing which focuses on the 2017 regulations for the second time at this weekend’s Mexican Grand Prix.

The team ran an experimental front wing on Friday in Austin, which is designed with next year’s new aerodynamic and tyre regulations in mind. Chief technical officer Pat Symonds confirmed the wing would again run in Mexico to get further understanding of its impact on the car.

“We’re running it again on Friday in Mexico because we need to get a certain amount of data on it,” Symonds said. “[So far] it correlates well with what we were looking to do. So it’s not an advantage to us this year, it’s just a thing we want do try for next year.”

However, when asked how much teams are able to learn for next year while running the current cars, Symonds replied: “Not at lot.

“That’s the difference this year, so when you have incremental changes to the rules you are always carrying on in the wind tunnel developing a car. You might change the model number, but a lot of what you are doing is relevant.

“If you come up with something that is really good and you say ‘Sod next year! We’ll get on with that now!’ then this year, what we’re doing in the wind tunnel isn’t relevant really.

“Funnily enough about a month ago we did something on next years car that worked really well and we thought ‘Crikey!’ and we never tried it on this years model, we just quickly put this years model back in and thought ‘that doesn’t work at all’ so it’s just one of those things.”

TECHNICAL SNAPSHOT: Austin

Scene at the United States Grand Prix

2016 USGP – Quotes of the week

2017 driver line-ups so far

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Click Here: kanken kids cheap

Formula One Group’s new chairman Chase Carey is confident he can take the sport to “another level”, while also saying the series “can not be a dicatorship”.

John Malone’s Liberty Media recently agreed to purchase F1 from CVC Capital Partners in a multi-billon deal.

Although Bernie Ecclestone has been asked to continue in his role as CEO, the long-time supremo will have to work with Carey, who met key members of the paddock while attending last weekend’s Singapore Grand Prix.

“You’ve got to understand what everybody wants and then find a path,” the American told the official F1 website.

“That is not a task for a committee, as they tend to become bureaucratic. But there also can’t be a dictatorship, even if probably they are used to it.”

The remark can be seen as a reference to Ecclestone, who has been running the sport almost single-handedly for several decades. Also present at Marina Bay, the 85-year-old has warned that he “will disappear for sure” if he does not like the direction F1 takes in the future.

Carey was quick to praise Ecclestone achievements when asked to explain how their association will work, but the vice chairman of the 21st Century Fox also believes “there is growth possibility in every area.”

“With all credit to Bernie, he’s had enormous success – the world admires Bernie for the business that he has built. But I still think that there is another level that we can take Formula One to.

“For the first few months – call it 100 days – it is largely listening and meeting – and digesting. And then come out of that phase with a degree of visions that continue to be shaped.

“Nothing is ever written in stone. Bernie is the CEO, so Bernie is going to lead it and I will work with Bernie to establish some kind of strategic plan to where you want to go.”

2016 Singapore Grand Prix – Driver ratings

REPORT: Rosberg takes title lead after Singapore thriller 

Breakfast with … Bernd Maylander

Silbermann says … Not so sleepy in Singapore

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Click Here: Fjallraven Kanken Art Spring Landscape Backpacks

Pirelli keen for warm weather pre-season testing

November 26, 2019 | News | No Comments

Pirelli is keen to carry out pre-season testing at a warm weather venue such as in Bahrain to gain better data on its new tyres in 2017.

The 2017 regulations will see increased downforce levels as well as wider tyres in order to provide faster cars, with Pirelli already having started its tyre testing program at the beginning of this month. Motorsport boss Paul Hembery wants pre-season testing to take place in the Middle East – as it did in 2014 – in order to avoid potentially unrepresentative temperatures in Europe.

“We would love to but that’s out of our hands,” Hembery told F1i when asked if pre-season testing could take place in Bahrain. “We have suggested that that’s what we’ll do but we will see what the teams decide.

“Cold temperatures could give limited data and we would obviously like to understand better where we are before we actually get in to a race.

“That’s something that would be ideal from our point of view and I would think from the teams point of view but there’s still a number of concerns regarding costs and the cost of replacing parts during a test period. So it might not yet happen.”

And Hembery says the new tyre sizes could lead to Pirelli supplying different versions of each compound next year, despite currently planning to stick with the five specifications ranging from ultrasoft to hard.

“It depends on which philosophies we use for different types of circuits and that’s something that we are simulating at the moment. If we carry on with the three compounds per race it’s how that would work with the circuits that we go to.

“If you can imagine the middle compound which might get used on a street circuit or vice versa there are sometimes street circuit compounds being used on the bigger circuits that maybe next year doesn’t quite work as well. So I think from a public’s point of view there will be five compounds.”

F1i Classic – Mayhem, monsoon and the mother of all Belgian Grand Prix

Breakfast with … Alan Jones

Max Verstappen interview: Destined to be a champion?

From Sauber to Ferrari – Exclusive interview with Kimi Raikkonen on F1’s evolution

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Click Here: liz claiborne perfume

Williams’ Lynn set for WEC debut with Manor

November 26, 2019 | News | No Comments

Williams F1 development driver Alex Lynn will make his FIA World Endurance Championship (WEC) debut during next month’s 6 Hours of Fuji with Manor.

The Briton will drive the #45 LMP2-entered Oreca 05 alongside former F1 racer Shinji Nakano and fellow countryman Tor Graves.

Currently competing in his sophomore GP2 Series campaign with DAMS, Lynn has already tested several times in F1 for Williams since joining the Grove-based outfit in the wake of his 2014 GP3 Series title.

A four-time race winner in the official F1 feeder series, the 23-year-old has been somewhat eclipsed in the running for Felipe Massa’s vacant seat at Williams, with fellow development driver Lance Stroll reportedly groomed for the promotion.

Lynn’s sportscar experience amounts to a run in last year’s Toyota TS 040 HYBRID LMP1 charger during a test organised in Bahrain last November.

Click Here: liz claiborne perfume

Chris Medland’s 2016 Malaysian Grand Prix preview

TECHNICAL: F1 telemetry: The data race

FEATURE: When F1 team-mates fight for the title

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Sebastian Vettel has apologised for making contact with Nico Rosberg in the first corner of the Malaysian Grand Prix on Sunday, which spun the Mercedes around causing Rosberg to drop all the way back to the rear.

Vettel had initially put the matter down as a racing incident, while also pointing the finger at Max Verstappen who squeezed him down the inside in the three-wide incident at Sepang.

Vettel was subsequently handed a three-place grid penalty for next weekend’s Japanese Grand Prix after the race stewards concluded that Vettel had made “a small error entering to the inside of turn 1 that led to the contact,” and that the indiecent had been “predominantly the fault of the [Ferrari] driver.”

After the race, Nico Rosberg revealed in his latest YouTube video blog that Vettel had subsequently contacted him to apologise for the costly contact.

“Sebastian just called me actually,” Rosberg said. “He apologised, which is nice. It doesn’t get me back the points that I lost, but it’s still nice to hear that.”

Rosberg himself had received little advance warning about being spun out.

“The start was good – I was just on the outside of Lewis and felt a massive hit on the rear which spun me around. For me I was sure that was it, I was sure the car was broken.

“Of course I spin turned it as quickly as possible and got going, and surprisingly the car was still okay. The thing is, it got a bit damaged but still more or less okay to drive it. I was really surprised.

“Then of course, full attack – that was all I could do. It was quite enjoyable at times to fight through the pack like that and pass left, right everywhere.

“Got through all the way and then fighting Kimi, my move was a bit for sure very aggressive and I accept to get a penalty for that, and that’s it

“Thankfully it didn’t hurt my result, so P3 – which of course was good damage limitation today even though I set out to win the race so not idea, but okay. That’s how it is.”

Rosberg still expected to lose ground in the drivers championship to his team mate Lewis Hamilton, but a late engine failure put the Briton out of the race and meant that Malaysia ended up proving a big boost to Rosberg’s title hopes.

“Points-wise a good day for me of course even though not for the right reasons because I want to get them on merit,” said Rosberg.

“I can understand Lewis’ situation of course because I’ve been there as well and it’s just horrible when you deserve to win a race and the technology lets you down. I’m sure he’s really, really gutted – that’s very understandable of course.”

“Now I’m just flying to Japan, going to have a few days off there,” he added. “A few days in Japan relaxing and then off to Suzuka, of course a great opportunity there again to win in Suzuka.”

F1i’s driver ratings for the 2016 Malaysian Grand Prix

FULL REPORT: Ricciardo wins in Malaysia as Hamilton retires from lead

Breakfast with… Gianni Morbidelli

Silbermann says … Bugged by Liberty

Romain Grosjean exclusive column: Haas can build momentum for 2017

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Click Here: juicy couture perfume

End of PU loophole among F1 rule changes for 2017

November 26, 2019 | News | No Comments

The FIA’s World Motor Sport Council (WMSC) has put forward a series of rule changes for the 2017 Formula One season, which includes the closing of the loophole in the power unit regulations that allows drivers to get big engine penalties at a same event all the while securing extra engine parts.

Current 1.6-litre V6 turbocharged power units are made up of six main components – the internal combustion engine (ICE), MGU-K, MGU-H, energy store (battery), turbocharger, and control electronics.

Each driver can use five of each of the above components during a championship season and any combination of them may be fitted to a car at any one time. The first time a driver uses a sixth of the above six elements a 10-place grid place penalty will be imposed. Every sixth part of the remaining elements used after that point means a five-place grid penalty.

Teams have tended to accumulate penalties during the same grand prix weekend in order to minimise the impact of taking new components. This was for instance the case of Lewis Hamilton in Spa-Francorchamps at the end of summer break.

Following a meeting of the WMSC on Wednesday in Paris, a statement reads that “during any single event, if a driver introduces more than one of a power unit element that is subject to penalty, only the last element fitted may be used at subsequent events without further penalty. This is to prevent the stockpiling of spare power unit elements”.

Another significant change concerns the tyre regulations, as official supplier Pirelli has already mandated the compound allocations for the first five events of the 2017 season.

With wider tyres set to be introduced next year and teams having to pick their compounds before pre-season testing takes place, it has been accepted that each driver will receive “two sets of the hardest compound specification, four sets of the medium compound specification and seven sets of the softest compound specification to each driver”.

The topic of launching a race in rainy conditions has also been raised. Following the backlash triggered by starting this year’s British Grand Prix behind the Safety Car due to the track being wet, a new procedure has been agreed upon.

“If a safety car is deemed to be required for the beginning of a race due to wet weather, a normal standing start will occur once the track is deemed safe to race. The process will see the safety car return to the pit lane and the cars assemble on the grid for the start.”

The FIA has also eased its ban on F1 drivers changing their helmet design during the course of the season.

“Drivers must continue to present their helmets in substantially the same livery at every event of the FIA Formula One World Championship for easy recognition of the driver in the car, however a driver will now be allowed one event (such as a home race) for a special livery (at the driver’s choice). Drivers will also be allowed to change their helmet liveries if changing teams during the season.”

Chris Medland’s 2016 Malaysian Grand Prix preview

TECHNICAL: F1 telemetry: The data race

FEATURE: When F1 team-mates fight for the title

F1i Classic: Sepang 2001 – Ferrari pulls off a masterstroke

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Alonso and Massa at odds over Austin clash

November 26, 2019 | News | No Comments

McLaren’s Fernando Alonso and Williams’ Felipe Massa had very different views of their clash at the Circuit of the Americas in the last few laps of the 2016 United States Grand Prix on Sunday.

Alonso barged past Massa at turn 16 with four laps remaining in the race, and the two cars bumped wheels on the exit of the corner. The incident was investigated by the stewards after the race who decided that no further action was required, but Massa remained furious with the two-time world champion’s driving.

“Fernando dived into the corner I was taking, hit my car and I got a puncture because of it.

“I was just going through the corner and he just dived completely inside,” Massa explained. “I was already entering the corner and he just hit my car and I had a puncture.

“Just destroyed the opportunity I had at that moment,” he complained. “I think yes for sure, it’s his responsibility.”

Naturally, Alonso had a very different view of the incident.

“To get past the Williams today you needed to overtake them in different places, like tight, slow-speed corners, and quite forcefully, and it was tough but hopefully enjoyable for the fans.

“I think that I was side-by-side with him, it’s not like I was coming from behind or any crazy thing, I was already side-by-side so there was no space for him to turn in,” adding that he saw it as a racing incident

REPORT: Hamilton takes crucial Austin win from Rosberg

2017 driver line-ups so far

Silbermann says … Taylor should take over F1

Romain Grosjean column: 100 races, now for the wins

PREVIEW: 2016 United States Grand Prix

TECHNICAL – Turbulent Jet Ignition: In the antechamber of F1 power

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

Massa reveals toughest F1 team mates

November 26, 2019 | News | No Comments

Future retiree Felipe Massa says that Michael Schumacher and Fernando Alonso were his toughest team mates over the course of his 250-Grand Prix career.

Massa started made his F1 debut in 2002 with Sauber before joining Ferrari in 2006 and then Williams in 2014.

“Alonso always treated me well, we never had problems,” Massa said. “But he was always nicer in front of me than behind.”

The two men found themselves at odds recently following their spat in the US GP at Austin. But standing next to each on the Mexican GP grid during the national anthem, Alonso offered a  warm embrace to his former team mate and rival.

“He looked at me and he was awkward, and gave me hug. Then I looked at him and said, ‘You were a son of a bitch… but I like you.’ Then he started to laugh.”

Speaking of Schumacher, who Massa raced with for just one season in 2006, the Brazilian described his relationship with the seven-time world champion as that of a student and his master.

“He was a huge influence in my career and a really good friend. I visited him when he was sleeping. It was not an easy thing,” Massa revealed, referring to the German’s tragic skiing accident which occurred in 2013.

Needless to say, the Brazilian Grand Prix will be a very special weekend for Massa who will be racing in front of his home crowd for the very last time in Formula 1.

“Interlagos is home. It’s the place that I grew up. It will be emotional racing there for the final time on such an amazing track.

“I’m looking forward to enjoying every lap and hopefully I can manage to finish the race with a good result.

“I have won twice at Interlagos and have finished on the podium many times and I hope we can get another one. It won’t be easy, but I will do everything I can for my people and for Brazil.”

INTERVIEW: Fernando Alonso: Why F1 is no longer just for heroes

TECHNICAL: Under the skin of the Ferrari SF16-H

F1i Classic: Brazil 1991 – Senna’s pain and glory

FEATURE: Foul Play or Foul Language

Keep up to date with all the F1 news via Facebook and Twitter

A USS Liberty’s Hero’s Passing

November 26, 2019 | News | No Comments

Terry Halbardier, who – as a 23-year old seaman in 1967 – thwarted Israeli attempts to sink the USS Liberty, died on Aug. 11 in Visalia, California. It took the U.S. government 42 years after the attack to recognize Halbardier’s heroism by awarding him the Silver Star, a delay explained by Washington’s determination to downplay Israeli responsibility for the 34 Americans killed and the 174 wounded.

On June 8, 1967, during the Six-Day War, the Israeli military attacked the USS Liberty, an American spy ship which had been monitoring Israeli transmissions about the conflict. Intercepted Israeli communications indicated that the goal was to sink the Liberty and leave no survivors.

Warplanes and torpedo boats had already killed 34 and wounded 174, when Halbardier slid over the Liberty’s napalm-glazed deck to jury-rig an antenna and get an SOS off to the Sixth Fleet.  The Israelis intercepted the SOS and broke off the attack immediately. In effect, Halbardier prevented the massacre of all 294 onboard. Still, the infamy of the attack on the Liberty was two-fold.

First, the Liberty, a virtually defenseless intelligence collection platform prominently flying an American flag in international waters, came under deliberate attack by Israeli aircraft and three 60-ton Israeli torpedo boats off the coast of the Sinai on a cloudless June afternoon during the six-day Israeli-Arab war. Second, President Lyndon Johnson called back carrier aircraft dispatched to defend the Liberty lest Israel be embarrassed — the start of an unconscionable cover-up, including top Navy brass, that persists to this day.

Given all they have been through, the Liberty survivors and other veterans – who joined Halbardier to celebrate his belated receipt of the Silver Star on May 27, 2009 – can be forgiven for having doubted that the day of the hero’s recognition would ever come.

In the award ceremony at the Visalia (California) office of Rep. Devin Nunes, the Republican congressman pinned the Silver Star next to the Purple Heart that Halbardier found in his home mailbox three years ago. Nunes said, “The government has kept this quiet I think for too long, and I felt as my constituent he [Halbardier] needed to get recognized for the services he made to his country.”

Nunes got that right. Despite the many indignities the Liberty crew has been subjected to, the mood in Visalia was pronouncedly a joyous one of Better (42 years) Late Than Never. And, it did take some time for the moment to sink in: Wow, a gutsy congressman not afraid to let the truth hang out on this delicate issue.

Treatment Accorded the Skipper

I was present that day and I could not get out of my head the contrast between this simple, uncomplicated event and the earlier rigmarole that senior Navy officers went through to pin a richly deserved Medal of Honor on another hero of that day, the Liberty’s skipper, Captain William McGonagle.

Although badly wounded by Israeli fire on June 8, 1967, McGonagle was able to keep the bombed, torpedoed, napalmed Liberty afloat and limping toward Malta, where what was left of the bodies of the 34 crewmen killed and the 174 wounded could be attended to. Do the math: yes, killed and wounded amounted to more than two-thirds of the Liberty crew of 294.

I remembered what a naval officer involved in McGonagle’s award ceremony told one of the Liberty crew: “The government is pretty jumpy about Israel…the State Department even asked the Israeli ambassador if his government had any objections to McGonagle getting the medal.”

When McGonagle received his award, the White House (the normal venue for a Medal of Honor award) was all booked up, it seems, and President Lyndon Johnson (who would have been the usual presenter) was unavailable.

So it fell to the Secretary of the Navy to sneak off to the Washington Navy Yard on the banks of the acrid Anacostia River, where he presented McGonagle with the Medal of Honor and a citation that described the attack but not the identity of the attackers.

Please don’t misunderstand. The Liberty crew is not big on ceremony. They are VERY-not-big on politicians who wink when Navy comrades are killed and wounded at sea. The Liberty survivors are big on getting the truth out about what actually happened that otherwise beautiful day in June 1967.

The award of the Silver Star to Terry Halbardier marked a significant step in the direction of truth telling. Halbardier said he accepted his Silver Star on behalf of the entire 294-man crew. He and fellow survivor Don Pageler expressed particular satisfaction at the wording of the citation, which stated explicitly — with none of the usual fudging — the identity of the attackers: “The USS Liberty was attacked by Israeli aircraft and motor torpedo boats in the East Mediterranean Sea….”

In the past, official citations, like Captain McGonagle’s, had avoided mentioning Israel by name when alluding to the attack. I think former U.S. Ambassador Edward Peck put it best in condemning this kind of approach as “obsequious, unctuous subservience to the peripheral interests of a foreign nation at the cost of the lives and morale of our own service members and their families.”  Strong words for a diplomat. But right on.

Just a Guy From Texas

Were it not for Halbardier’s bravery, ingenuity, and technical expertise, the USS Liberty would surely have sunk, taking down much – if not all – of the crew.

You see, the first thing the Israeli aircraft bombed and strafed were the Liberty’s communications antennae and other equipment. They succeeded in destroying all the antennae that were functional. One antenna on the port side, though, had been out of commission and had escaped damage.

In receiving the Silver Star, Halbardier made light of his heroism, claiming that he was just a guy from Texas who could do a whole lot with simple stuff like baling wire. (In the infantry we called this kind of thing a “field expedient.”)

In any case, with his can-do attitude and his technical training, he figured he might be able to get that particular antenna working again. But first he would have to repair a cable that had been destroyed on deck and then connect the antenna to a transmitter.

The deck was still being strafed, but Halbardier grabbed a reel of cable, ran out onto the deck, and attached new cable to the antenna so a radioman could get an SOS out to the Sixth Fleet in the Mediterranean.

Voila. “Mayday” went out; almost immediately the Israeli aircraft and torpedo ships broke off the attack and went back to base; the Israeli government sent a quick apology to Washington for its unfortunate “mistake;” and President Johnson issued orders to everyone to make believe the Israelis were telling the truth — or at least to remain silent.

To their discredit, top Navy brass went along, and the Liberty survivors were threatened with court martial and prison if they so much as mentioned to their wives what had actually happened. They were enjoined as well from discussing it with one another.

As Liberty crewman Don Pageler put it, “We all headed out after that, and we didn’t talk to each other.” The circumstances were ready-made for serious Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.

The stories shared by Liberty survivors after the award ceremony, including descriptions of the macabre but necessary effort to reassemble torpedoed body parts, and the plague of survivor’s guilt, were as heart-rending as any I have heard. They are stories that should be shared more widely for those muzzled far too long.

These were the deep emotional scars to supplement the ones all over Halbardier’s body, some of which he uncovered when asked by the local press gathered there in Visalia. Typically, Halbardier made light of the shrapnel that had to be plucked out of his flesh, emphasizing that he was lucky compared to some of the other crew.

No Mistake

Despite Israeli protestations, the accumulated evidence, including intercepted voice communications, is such that no serious observer believes Israel’s “Oops” excuse of a terrible mistake. The following exchanges are excerpts of testimony from U.S. military and diplomatic officials given to Alison Weir, founder of “If Americans Knew” and author of American Media Miss the Boat:

Israeli pilot to ground control: “This is an American ship. Do you still want us to attack?”

Ground control: “Yes, follow orders.”

…………………..

“But sir, it’s an American ship — I can see the flag!”

Ground control: “Never mind; hit it!”

Haviland Smith, a CIA officer stationed in Beirut during the Six-Day War, says he was told that the transcripts were “deep-sixed,” because the U.S. government did not want to embarrass Israel.

Equally telling is the fact that the National Security Agency (NSA) destroyed voice tapes seen by many intelligence analysts, showing that the Israelis knew exactly what they were doing. I asked a former CIA colleague, who was also an analyst at that time, what he remembered of those circumstances. Here is his e-mail reply:

“The chief of the analysts studying the Arab-Israeli region at the time told me about the intercepted messages and said very flatly and firmly that the pilots reported seeing the American flag and repeated their requests of confirmation of the attack order. Whole platoons of Americans saw those intercepts. If NSA now says they do not exist, then someone ordered them destroyed.”

One need hardly add at this point that the destruction of evidence without investigation is an open invitation to repetition in the future. Think the more recent torture-interrogation videotapes.

As for the legal side: the late Captain Ward Boston, unburdened himself on his accomplice role as the Navy lawyer appointed as senior counsel to Adm. Isaac Kidd, who led a one-week (!) investigation and then followed orders to pronounce the attack on the Liberty a case of “mistaken identity.” Boston signed a formal declaration on Jan. 8, 2004, in which he said he was “outraged at the efforts of the apologists for Israel in this country to claim that this attack was a case of ‘mistaken identity.’” Boston continued:

“The evidence was clear. Both Adm. Kidd and I believed with certainty that this attack … was a deliberate effort to sink an American ship and murder its entire crew … Not only did the Israelis attack the ship with napalm, gunfire, and missiles, Israeli torpedo boats machine-gunned three lifeboats that had been launched in an attempt by the crew to save the most seriously wounded — a war crime …

“I know from personal conversations I had with Adm. Kidd that President Lyndon Johnson and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara ordered him to conclude that the attack was a case of ‘mistaken identity’ despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.”

W. Patrick Lang, Col., USA (ret.), who was the Defense Intelligence Agency’s top analyst for the Middle East for eight years, recounted the Israeli air attacks as follows: “The flight leader spoke to his base to report that he had the ship in view, that it was the same ship he had been briefed on, and that it was clearly marked with the U.S. flag…

“The flight commander was reluctant. That was very clear. He didn’t want to do this. He asked them a couple of times, ‘Do you really want me to do this?’ I’ve remembered it ever since. It was very striking. I’ve been harboring this memory for all these years.”

Lang, of course, is not alone. So too Terry Halbardier, who told those assembled last Wednesday, “I think about it [the attack on the Liberty] every day.”

Why Sink the Ship?

What we know for sure is, as the independent commission headed by former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Thomas Moorer put it, the attack “was a deliberate attempt to destroy an American ship and kill her entire crew.”

What we do not know for sure is why the Israelis wanted that done. Has no one dared ask the Israelis? One view is that the Israelis did not want the United States to find out they were massing troops to seize the Golan Heights from Syria and wanted to deprive the U.S. of the opportunity to argue against such a move.

James Bamford offers an alternative view in his excellent book, Body of Secrets. Bamford adduces evidence, including reporting from an Israeli journalist eyewitness and an Israeli military historian, of wholesale killing of Egyptian prisoners of war at the coastal town of El Arish in the Sinai.

The Liberty was patrolling directly opposite El Arish in international waters but within easy range to pick up intelligence on what was going on there. And the Israelis were well aware of that. But the important thing here is not to confuse what we know (the deliberate nature of the Israeli attack) with the ultimate purpose behind it, which remains open to speculation.

Also worth noting is the conventional wisdom prevalent in our Fawning Corporate Media (FCM) that Egypt forced Israel into war in June 1967. An excellent, authoritative source has debunked that — none other than former Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin! In an unguarded moment in 1982, when he was prime minister, he admitted publicly:

“In June 1967, we had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that [Egyptian President] Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”

Thus, the Israeli attack admittedly amounted to starting a war of aggression, and the occupied West Bank territories and the Golan Heights – gained by the Israelis in the 1967 war – remain occupied to this day. The post World War II tribunal at Nuremberg distinguished a “war of aggression” from other war crimes, terming it the “supreme international crime, differing from other war crimes only in that it contains the accumulated evil of the whole.”

Perhaps the attempt to sink the Liberty and finish off all survivors qualifies as one of those accumulated evils. Terry Halbardier summed it up this way when he was awarded his Silver Star:  “There’s lots of theories but let’s just say they didn’t want us listening in to what they wanted to do.”

Getting Away With Murder

In sum, on June 8, 1967, the Israeli government learned that it could get away with murder, literally, and the crime would be covered up, so strong is the influence of the Israel Lobby in our Congress — and indeed, in the White House. And those USS Liberty veterans who survived well enough to call for an independent investigation have been hit with charges of, you guessed it, anti-Semitism.

Does all this have relevance today? Of course. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu understands that there is little that Israel could do that would earn the opprobrium of the U.S. Congress or retaliation from the White House, whether it’s building illegal settlements or slaughtering civilians in Gaza. The Israelis seem convinced they remain in the catbird’s seat, largely because of the Israel Lobby’s influence with U.S. lawmakers and opinion makers.

One of the few moments when a U.S. official has had the audacity to face Israel down came from – significantly – a U.S. Navy admiral. In early July 2008, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, was sent to Israel to read the riot act to then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, who seemed to be itching to start hostilities with Iran while President George W. Bush was in office.

We learned from the Israeli press that Mullen, fearing some form of Israeli provocation, went so far as to warn the Israelis not to even think about another incident like the attack on the USS Liberty on June 8, 1967 — that the Israelis should disabuse themselves of the notion that U.S. military support would be knee-jerk automatic if Israel somehow provoked open hostilities with Iran.

This is the only occasion I am aware of in which a U.S. official of such seniority braced Israel about the Liberty incident. A gutsy move, especially with Vice President Dick Cheney and national security aide Elliott Abrams then in the White House, two hawks who might well bless — or even encourage — an Israeli provocation that would make it very difficult for Washington to avoid springing to the defense of its “ally.”

The Israelis know that Mullen knows that the attack on the Liberty was deliberate.  Mullen could have raised no more neuralgic an issue to take a shot across an Israeli bow than to cite the attack on the Liberty. The Jerusalem Post reported that Mullen cautioned that a Liberty-type incident must be avoided in any future military actions in the Middle East.

Perhaps Mullen had learned something from the heroism of Terry Halbardier.

Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in Washington, DC. During his career as a CIA analyst, he prepared and briefed the President’s Daily Brief and chaired National Intelligence Estimates. He is a member of the Steering Group of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).

Read More