Author: GETAWAYTHEBERKSHIRES

Home / Author: GETAWAYTHEBERKSHIRES

Why isn’t it easier to prepare and file your tax returns?

Because, according to new report (pdf) from the office of Sen. Elizabeth Warrren (D-Mass.), the tax preparation industry has successfully lobbied the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to keep it that difficult, ensuring corporate profits and unfair expenses and hassle for taxpayers.

This tax season, the report states, “[t]axpayers will spend, on average, 13 hours preparing and filing their returns, and will pay $200 for tax preparation services—a cost equal to almost 10% of the average federal tax refund.” Using these services also means sharing personal information with third parties.

But a better way—one that would make the filing process take just minutes, not to mention save money, is possible, especially for those with a simple tax situation.  And it could help as many as 60 million households.

Though the IRS was supposed to implement a “return-free” filing system—one that would use taxpayer information employers, banks, and other entities already submit to the agency so the government can pre-prepare and users can verify or edit the return—by 2008 , “the IRS has time and again acquiesced to industry demands” to block it, as it would be “a fundamental threat to [the industry’s] operations.”

The industry, which has “a vested interest in a more complex, more expensive tax filing system,” has spent “millions of dollars lobbying Congress against return-free filing and mounting fake ‘grassroots’ campaigns against return-free filing,” and has even had the help of supposed anti-tax groups for who champion a simpler process, the report states.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

To tackle these issues, Warren introduced on Wednesday the Tax Filing Simplification Act of 2016 (pdf). It would, a press statement from Warren’s office summarizes,

“Congress should be making it easier for Americans to file their taxes each year, not bowing to the interests of the tax prep industry,” stated Warren. “The Tax Filing Simplification Act is a commonsense bill that would help taxpayers all across this country file their taxes with less stress and fewer costs, and it would push the IRS to use the authority it already has to simplify Tax Day for all Americans.”

Among the co-sponsors of the legislation is Sen. Bernie Sanders, who added that the legislation “would end the absurdity of Americans having to pay private companies hundreds of dollars to pay their taxes.” “Tax Day has become an opportunity for corporations to profit off of confusion over our complicated tax code,” he said.

Dozens of professors and economists have voiced their support for the legislation as well.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

After being sued for $30 million by a corporate landfill owner for “speaking their truth in order to protect their community,” four residents of Uniontown, Alabama—a poor, predominantly Black town with a median per capita income of around $8,000—are fighting back. 

On Thursday, the ACLU asked a federal court to dismiss the defamation lawsuit against Esther Calhoun, Benjamin Eaton, Ellis B. Long, and Mary B. Schaeffer—all members of the community group Black Belt Citizens Fighting for Health and Justice.

The defendants are being sued by Georgia-based Green Group Holdings for speaking out against the polluting, hazardous coal ash that the company keeps in a landfill in a residential area—a “sprawling dump” that stands as a symbol of racial and environmental injustice. 

According to AL.com:

“The lawsuit focuses on comments made by visitors to the group’s Facebook page relating to controversies over the landfill’s activities near an old cemetery and accusations that the facility is polluting the community and oppressing local residents,” Sue Sturgis wrote in April for Facing South.

Among the comments the lawsuit calls “false and defamatory” are these remarks by the group’s president, Calhoun (the bold text is the Green Group Holdings’ own, showing what the company objects to):

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

In its filing on Thursday, the ACLU argues that the lawsuit “involves speech at the very core of the First Amendment,” said Lee Rowland, senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project.

“No one should have to face a multimillion-dollar federal lawsuit just for engaging in heartfelt community advocacy,” Rowland said. “All Americans have a right to speak out against hazardous substances being dumped in their home towns, and the Constitution prevents companies from using lawsuits to silence their critics.”

Click Here: camiseta river plate

The ACLU reports that before filing the defamation suit, a lawyer for Green Group Holdings provided the defendants with a list of demands in exchange for not suing.

“Not only have Black people been expected to endure this kind of systematic racial and environmental injustice throughout our nation’s history, they are expected to bear it silently or be subjected to harsh consequences just for advocating for their health and community.”
—Dennis Parker, ACLU

That so-called “settlement proposal” would have required a full apology from each defendant; access to the group’s future social media postings; and extensive details about Black Belt Citizens’ membership, advocacy, and communications with other environmental groups, among other things. The proposal also would have required each of the defendants to withdraw as complainants in a federal civil rights complaint (pdf) filed with the EPA. 

The defendants scoffed at the offer.

“Not only have Black people been expected to endure this kind of systematic racial and environmental injustice throughout our nation’s history, they are expected to bear it silently or be subjected to harsh consequences just for advocating for their health and community,” said Dennis Parker, director of the ACLU’s Racial Justice Program. “We want to ensure that our clients don’t have to face that choice in Uniontown.”

Indeed, said Calhoun on Thursday: “State officials would never have allowed the landfill to be here if we were a rich, white neighborhood. They put it here because we’re a poor, Black community and they thought we wouldn’t fight back. But we are fighting back and we’re not afraid to make our voices heard.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

Half of Americans say they want Democrats to control Congress after the 2018 midterm elections, according to an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll released Thursday.

Fifty percent of those surveyed said they want Democrats to control the legislative branch, while 42 percent said they want Republicans to retain control of Congress.

It’s the first time either party has reached the 50 percent threshold on the question since 2008, NBC noted.

ADVERTISEMENT

Republicans have swept four contested House special elections this year, boosting President TrumpDonald John TrumpSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote Warren, Democrats urge Trump to back down from veto threat over changing Confederate-named bases Esper orders ‘After Action Review’ of National Guard’s role in protests MORE and congressional Republicans’s agenda. Democrats, meanwhile, have seen a surge of candidates running for the House since Trump entered office.

Click Here: Bape Kid 1st Camo Ape Head rompers

Trump’s approval rating in the newest poll has stayed steady at 40 percent, while 55 percent continue to disapprove of the job he is doing.

The survey of 900 adults was conducted June 17-20 and has a margin of error of 3.27 percentage points.

Rep. Mo BrooksMorris (Mo) Jackson BrooksOvernight Defense: Senate confirms US military’s first African American service chief | Navy to ban display of Confederate flags | GOP lawmakers urge Trump not to cut troops in Germany Republicans urge Trump to reject slashing US troop presence in Germany Conservative lawmakers press Trump to suspend guest worker programs for a year MORE (R-Ala.) released a new ad for his Senate campaign Monday that uses audio from the June shooting that injured House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.), a controversial move that underscores the contentious race for an Alabama Senate seat.

The Republican side of that race has turned heated in the weeks ahead of the Aug. 15 primary, when nine candidates will compete for the GOP nomination to serve out the rest of Attorney General Jeff SessionsJefferson (Jeff) Beauregard SessionsMcCabe, Rosenstein spar over Russia probe Rosenstein takes fire from Republicans in heated testimony Rosenstein defends Mueller appointment, role on surveillance warrants MORE’s term. But Brooks is facing criticism from his own party, as well as from those close to Scalise, for the controversial choice.

ADVERTISEMENTBrooks’s new ad opens with the sound of five gunshots ringing out at last month’s practice for Republican lawmakers before the annual Congressional Baseball Game. As the audio plays, text emerges on the screen linking the shooter to Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersThe Hill’s 12:30 Report: Milley apologizes for church photo-op Harris grapples with defund the police movement amid veep talk Biden courts younger voters — who have been a weakness MORE (I-Vt.), whose presidential campaign he volunteered for.

“June 14: A Bernie Sanders supporter fires on Republican congressmen. Mo Brooks gives his belt as a tourniquet to help the wounded,” the text on the screen reads.

Then, Brooks is shown speaking with reporters at the shooting. The ad characterizes the interview as coming from the “liberal media” as a reporter asks Brooks whether the shooting changed his views on guns.

“The Second Amendment, the right to bear arms, is to help ensure that we always have a republic. So no, I’m not changing my positions on any of the rights that we enjoy as Americans,” Brooks says in the footage.

Five people were injured in the shooting: two Capitol Police officers, a congressional staffer, a lobbyist and Scalise. Scalise remains in the hospital as he recovers from the gunshot in his hip.  Last week, MedStar Washington Hospital Center announced that doctors performed surgery on Scalise to manage infection, and he remains in fair condition.

Some in Scalise’s camp slammed the ad as an attempt to use the shooting for political gain.

“I guess some people have their own ideas about what’s appropriate,” Scalise spokesman Chris Bond said when asked about the ad.

Scalise’s chief of staff, Brett Horton, tweeted that the ad “makes my stomach turn.”

In a series of tweets, former Scalise spokesman T.J. Tatum called the ad “beyond perverse.”

“That a sitting member of Congress believes this is even remotely acceptable is a sad and revealing commentary on the state of our democracy,” Tatum wrote.

Brooks defended the ad in an interview with NBC News, saying that “the truth is always appropriate.”

“Senate placeholder Luther Strange has made the Second Amendment right to bear arms a major issue in this Alabama Senate race. … And I believe this ad shows my conviction to defend the Second Amendment,” he said to the network.

“It’s one thing to talk about defense of the Second Amendment, it’s another thing to have lived through an assassination attempt and to reaffirm your commitment.”

The ad hit airwaves on Monday and will run on broadcast and cable television, as well as on digital platforms, to boost Brooks’s bid for Sessions’s old seat. Sen. Luther Strange (R) was appointed to fill the seat in the meantime but now has to run for the right to fill out the remainder of Sessions’s term, which ends in 2020.

Click Here: Fjallraven Kanken Art Spring Landscape Backpacks

Strange, Brooks and former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore are considered the top candidates in that race, with two expected to move to a runoff after the primary if no candidate wins the majority.

Senate Republicans have decided to treat Strange as an incumbent, a controversial decision that’s raised eyebrows since he was appointed to the seat, rather than winning it in an election. That move has given Strange cover from the National Republican Senatorial Committee and the Senate Leadership Fund, a super PAC with ties to Senate GOP leadership.

So far, Brooks has been on the receiving end of a barrage of attacks from the Senate Leadership Fund and Strange for his past criticism of President Trump. During the GOP presidential primary, when Brooks was supporting Sen. Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzSenate advances public lands bill in late-night vote The Hill’s Morning Report – Trump’s public standing sags after Floyd protests GOP senators introduce resolution opposing calls to defund the police MORE (Texas), he called Trump a “serial adulterer” and said he could not support him.

With most polling showing Moore in the lead, Strange and Brooks have been engaged in a tough battle for the second runoff spot. But special elections, particularly primaries, are notoriously hard to predict or model, adding to the uncertainty.

One Alabama Republican who remains neutral in the primary told The Hill that Brooks’s ad seems like a push to “go big or go home” amid concerns about whether he’d make the runoff.

Brooks’s visibility in the shooting’s aftermath raised his national exposure months before the bid. He offered accounts of the shooting in its immediate aftermath, describing how he and others responded and remaining on the phone with CNN as the network spoke to him live for an extended period of time.

On air, he also described his efforts to use his belt as a tourniquet to stop the bleeding of a congressional staff member who was shot in the leg.

“Brooks got a big bump off that shooting incident, he got a million or more than a million dollars worth of free publicity,” longtime Alabama political commentator Steve Flowers told The Hill.

Brooks said in an interview earlier this month that attention from the shooting gives him “mixed emotions,” claiming that he won’t “bring it up” unless asked.

“If you noticed my speeches at these public events, I never bring up that event. If I’m asked about it — as you know, when I’m asked about most anything — I will respond to the question. But I don’t bring it up,” he said in an interview with Birmingham’s Talk 99.5.

While the ad is sparking controversy in Washington, veteran GOP strategist Doug Heye admitted that it could be effective for Brooks in the GOP primary.

“The ad could work, the [Second] Amendment is very popular with Republican primary voters, especially in Alabama,” Heye, a former Republican National Committee spokesman, said.

“I just think that whether it’s pro- or anti-gun control, footage from those events shouldn’t be used by any candidate.”

A first-its-kind pilot program, launching in four states this spring, aims to expand medical abortion access for women at a time when brick-and-mortar clinics are closing at a record pace.

The Guardian reported Thursday on the program, which will be run as a pilot study out of clinics in four states—New York, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington. It is the brainchild of the New York-based research group Gynuity Health Projects, which seeks to make reproductive health technologies more convenient, more acceptable, safer, and more widely accessible.

According to the Guardian, the study “may…finally deliver on what reproductive rights advocates have always seen as the true promise of abortion drugs: abortion, without the clinic.”

And in places like Hawaii, where only two islands out of the nine have abortion clinics, or Oregon, where more than 78 percent of counties are without abortion providers, this pilot program could be revolutionary. At least four U.S. states have just one operational outpatient abortion clinic, and Wyoming has none.

The paper explains:

As Dr. Elizabeth Raymond, of Gynuity, wrote with colleagues for JAMA Internal Medicine this week, following such a model “enhances privacy and autonomy as well as access. The dispersion of care also helps to avoid harassment of both patients and clinicians.”

What’s more, the authors noted, existing restrictions on medical abortion “are medically unjustified: mifepristone, which is dispensed in single doses, has no immediate clinical effects, and thus the location where a patient receives it, or even where she swallows it, is irrelevant to its efficacy or safety.”

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Indeed, bolstering this argument, the FDA on Wednesday loosened 15-year-old restrictions on the same drug—mifepristone, also known as Mifeprex—bringing the total number of trips most women undergoing the procedure will make to a healthcare provider down to two, from three.

According to the Guardian, the Gynuity team submitted their plans to the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research last August “and invited evaluators to raise any concerns. None were forthcoming.”

Still, many questions remain. The Guardian reports:

But similar programs have been met with success elsewhere, especially the Tabbot Foundation, a direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service launched last fall in Australia. 

According to the authors at JAMA, one of whom is that program’s founder and medical director:

While he warned that Gynuity and its partners “should be ready for a wall of opposition, Tabbot Foundation founder Paul Hyland also told the Guardian: “Mifepristone is the most revolutionary drug in reproductive medicine since contraception. It’s amazing that this can be provided so easily and that we’ve taken such a long time to realize its true potential.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

Amid protests and strikes, Greek lawmakers passed a crushing new austerity package early on Monday.

The reform package, which passed by a razor-thin margin, was described as “the toughest…the thrice bailed-out nation has been forced to enact since its debt crisis began,” according to the Guardian.

The austerity measures represent €5.4 billion ($6.2 billion) in savings and would reduce Greece’s pension payouts while raising taxes. The so-called “Troika” of international creditors—the European Commission, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the European Central Bank—are demanding such painful reforms in return for an €86 billion bailout agreed to last July in a bid to pull Greece out of its debt crisis.

Reuters reports:

In fact, wrote Guardian economics editor Larry Elliot on Sunday: “Greece is being set budgetary targets that the IMF knows are unrealistic and is being set up to fail. It will then be punished further for being unable to do what was impossible in the first place.”

While Parliament debated the measures inside, Greek citizens expressed their anger in the streets. Police said almost 18,000 people turned up in Athens and about 8,000 in Thessaloniki on Sunday, following additional protests on Saturday.

“Every day they destroy our country a little more,” Vassilis Papadopoulos, a young waiter, said to the Guardian of the international creditors one might argue they’d be better off without.

Indeed, “months of callous inaction have pushed the mood in Greek society into a dangerous place,” wrote journalist Paul Mason on Monday. “A population that, two years ago, started demanding and giving printed receipts as an act of collective moral renewal, has given up on them once again. The most popular graffiti tag has become ‘all this political shit’.”

Mason continued:

The Parliament’s vote came ahead of a meeting on Monday of European finance ministers to discuss Greece’s debt problems—a meeting painted as a fight between the IMF, which is calling for debt relief, and Germany, which opposes any debt forgiveness.

“Tomorrow is a very important day. After six whole years, during which European institutions have been meeting constantly to discuss the Greek (financial) crisis and have only considered austerity measures, tomorrow, the Eurogroup will also discuss Greek debt relief,” Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras said on Sunday.

According to the Guardian, Tsipras “won unexpected support at the weekend from Germany’s vice-chancellor, Sigmar Gabriel. In a statement to Reuters, Sigmar, who is also the economy minister, insisted debt relief was now the only way of plucking Greece out of its seemingly endless economic death spiral. ‘The eurogroup meeting on Monday must find a way to break the vicious circle,’ he wrote. ‘Everyone knows that this debt relief will have to come at some point. It makes no sense to shirk from that time and time again’.”

The BBC quoted the head of the Eurogroup of finance ministers, Jeroen Dijsselbloem, as saying Monday’s discussion was merely preliminary and that he hoped a deal with Greece would be finalized by May 24. 

Speaking after the meeting, Greek finance minister Euclid Tsakalotos reportedly said, “the IMF wants more on debt relief than member states.”

However, in a recent blog post, former Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis warned against giving the IMF too much credit for its seemingly reasonable stance.

“The IMF’s austerity package is inhuman because it will destroy hundreds of thousands of small businesses, defund society’s weakest, and turbocharge the humanitarian crisis,” Varoufakis wrote in April. “And it is unnecessary because meaningful growth is much more likely to return to Greece under our policy proposals to end austerity, target the oligarchy, and reform public administration (rather than attacking, again, the weak).”

He continued: “Abandoning the template in Greece would be to confess to the possibility that decades of anti-social programs imposed globally might have been inhuman and unnecessary.”

As outside entities hold Greece’s fate in their hands, Varoufakis argued, “[t]he result is a Europe more deeply immersed in disrepute and a Greek people watching from the sidelines an ugly brawl darkening their already bleak future.”

A study released last week offered confirmation that the Troika’s “bailout” packages delivered to Greece primarily served European banks rather than the Greek people.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Click Here: Cardiff Blues Store

Read More

This Tuesday, April 26, marks 30 years since an explosion decimated reactor No. 4 at Chernobyl’s nuclear power plant, killing 31 nuclear and rescue workers, sickening thousands more, and forcing hundreds of thousands to evacuate. 

Chernobyl was the worst nuclear disaster in history, exposing hundreds of millions of people in 40 different countries to at least some dose of radioactivity.

Its repercussions continue to be felt far and wide.

Just this week, the Associated Press described Belarus, where 70 percent of the radioactive fallout from Chernobyl landed, as “a nation showing little regard for the potentially cancer-causing isotopes still to be found in the soil.”

AP reported:

Meanwhile, a teacher from Belarus’s heavily contaminated Mogilev region tells Greenpeace Central and Eastern Europe officer Andrey Allakhverdov that around 40 percent of her students have health problems: asthma, diabetes, and cancer or weak immune, respiratory, and digestive systems.

“The suffering caused by Chernobyl shows why we need to get rid of nuclear power for good,” Allakhverdov wrote on Monday.

But as ABC News wrote on Tuesday, “the long-term health effects of Chernobyl remain intensely disputed.”

USA Today reported: “The total death toll from cancer from the accident is projected to reach 4,000 for people exposed to high doses of radiation, and another 5,000 deaths among those who had less radiation exposure, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations and the World Health Organization.”

And in its account titled, “Thirty Years After Chernobyl, We’re Still Calculating How Much Cancer It Caused,” Slate noted that in 2006, an international team of scientists predicted a total of 22,800 radiation-induced cancers, excluding thyroid cancers, among the 572 million people who got at least some exposure to Chernobyl radioactivity.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Regarding thyroid cancer, which “warranted separate special scrutiny” due to how the thyroid “is uniquely affected by a specific radioactive isotope, iodine-131,” author and radiation expert Timothy J. Jorgensen explained at Slate:

And many of those who are at risk feel that they’ve been abandoned by their governments.

Indeed, “[w]ith the contaminated regions poor and of little influence, there [is] little appetite to reopen the issue,” Oksana Kadun, head doctor at Ivankov hospital, the closest to the exclusion zone, told ABC.

ABC reports that in some areas of Ukraine, the “government pays people compensation for Chernobyl—known by Ukrainians as ‘coffin money.’ But with the country on the edge of default, the government has been curtailing the payments for some and reclassifying areas previously deemed contaminated.”

Click Here: All Blacks Rugby Jersey

To that end, Greenpeace on Tuesday was projecting survivors’ portraits onto Chernobyl’s damaged reactor.

“Every day these survivors must make decisions on how to reduce or limit their exposure to radiation,” Greenpeace said in a call to action. “Shopping, cooking, eating, working outside or heating their homes are daily choices that can put their families at risk.”

The message continued: “Worse still, these same governments want to spend billions on extremely risky nuclear energy while ignoring their responsibility to support those who still live in the shadow of Chernobyl’s radioactive legacy.”

“It is unjust to cut programs to protect Chernobyl survivors,” Greenpeace declared, “And it’s madness to spend more money on nuclear power when safe and clean renewable energy is affordable and ready to empower communities.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

Click:Hinode 1000SPF315S 315A 1000Vac aR Fuses

After weeks of polls showing Donald Trump gaining on Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton’s once sizable lead, for the first time on Monday, Real Clear Politics recorded the New York billionaire ahead in the national polling average.

For the period between May 13-19, the presumptive Republican nominee polled ahead of Clinton by a national average of 0.2 points.

The new figure places the upcoming presidential contest in stark new light. 

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Click Here: cd universidad catolica

That national average was posted on the heels of two separate national polls which showed the two running neck-and-neck: A Washington Post/ ABC News survey released Sunday has the two in a “statistical dead heat” with Trump ahead of Clinton 46 percent to 44 percent among registered voters; while a survey from NBC News/ Wall Street Journal, also Sunday, recorded Clinton polling ahead of Trump 46 to 43 percent.

Perhaps even more troubling, the NBC/WSJ survey found that the negative ratings for the two presumptive nominees are the highest in the history of the poll. Fifty-four percent of those surveyed hold a negative opinion of Clinton and 58 percent have a negative opinion of Trump.

At the same time, Democratic challenger Bernie Sanders continues to best both Clinton and Trump in favorability ratings (43 percent hold a positive view of the Vermont senator versus 36 percent who have a negative view) and maintains a double-digit lead over the Republican candidate.

NBC/WSJ recorded Sanders ahead of Trump by 15 points.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

Addressing concerns that the media may preemptively announce his rival Hillary Clinton as the “presumptive Democratic Party nominee” even before she has won the requisite numbers of pledge delegates, Bernie Sanders over the weekend indicated that such reporting would be both wrong and irresponsible and held to his commitment to take his campaign all the way to the national convention when so-called superdelegates will finally—and for the first time, in fact—be able to cast their vote for who they believe will make the best nominee.

Six states are holding Democratic primaries this Tuesday, including California, New Mexico, New Jersey, Montana, South Dakota, and North Dakota.

Amid some speculation, bolstered by overt comments by people like MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, that cable outlets or other news agencies would call the election in favor of Clinton before all the results of next Tuesday’s results are in, Sander reiterated his argument that even though he has a steep hill to climb, the race is much closer than often reported.

“It is extremely unlikely that Secretary Clinton will have the requisite number of pledged delegates to claim victory on Tuesday night,” Sanders said at a press conference in California on Saturday. “Now I have heard reports that Secretary Clinton has said it’s all going to be over on Tuesday night. I have reports that the media, after the New Jersey results come in, are going to declare that it is all over. That simply is not accurate.”

What that means, he added, is that he will continue to campaign until the last votes are cast in Washington, D.C.’s primary on June 14 and will then bring his message to July’s Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia. “[It] will be a contested convention,” he said.

On Sunday morning’s Face The Nation, Democratic Party operative David Axelrod was the latest to say that Clinton would likely “clinch” the nomination before polls close in California.

While Sanders does not deny the delegate math is not in his favor, he explained to the more 13,500 supporters at the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum why he continues to believe he is the best choice to defeat Donald Trump in the general election.

Citing the consistent trends of both national and state polls showing him performing better against the billionaire reality tv star than Clinton, Sanders declared: “I hope that the delegates going to the Democratic National Convention understand that in virtually every state poll we do much better against Donald Trump than Secretary Clinton. If the delegates at the Democratic National Convention want to make sure we defeat Trump and defeat him badly we are the candidate to do that.”

And on Sunday, Sanders tweeted:

As of Saturday afternoon, according to Associated Press figures, Sanders trailed Clinton in pledged delegates by a tally of 1,769 to 1,501 — a difference of 268. Meanwhile, among the superdelegates—elected and party officials who automatically attend the convention where they vote for the candidate of their choice—Clinton has the stated support of 547 of them, compared to 46 who at this point say they back Sanders. Importantly, however, none of these superdelegates have actually “voted” and they can change their minds at any point until casting their ballot at the convention.

Click Here: cheap sydney roosters jersey

And so while the real difference between the candidates is less than 300 delegates, the media often continue to report that difference as more than twice that.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

As of this writing on Sunday morning, for example, anyone going to MSNBC’s “delegate tracker” on their website would see this:

Instead of showing the real difference of 268, this tally shows the difference as 778.

Such sloppy and misleading reporting—which has been ongoing, despite criticism, for months and months—gives the impression to uninformed voters that it’s objectively true when outlets declare Clinton needs “about 60 more delegates” to clinch the nomination. The problem? It’s not true. In reality, Clinton needs 614 delegates to get to that magic 2,383 number. And as Sanders campaign has been arguing, she is unlikely to get that even if she wins New Jersey or other stats on Tuesday.

Expressing disgust with how the delegate count has been reported throughout the primary season, political observer and columnist Seth Abramson recently wrote:

And as New York Daily News columnist Shaun King recently reported, even top staff at the DNC have gone out of their way to explicitly condemn the way many cable outlets and news agencies have reported on the delegate numbers.

“We must ask ourselves this question — if the Democratic Party asked CNN and other networks not to include these superdelegates, and made it abundantly clear that they are not official until the superdelegates actually vote at the Democratic Convention in late July, why are they including them anyway?”

For the record, and as Sanders also argued on Saturday, King concluded that “Anyone who ‘calls the election’ on June 7th, be it the Clinton campaign or television networks, is knowingly and deliberately going against the very rules of the party.”

During its push in California over the weekend, the Sanders campaign also noted on Sunday that amid a record-setting surge of new voter registrations in the state, the senator in recent weeks has drawn more than 211,000 Californians to hear him at rallies that are far bigger and more boisterous than Clinton’s.

Though Clinton and Sanders had agreed to debate in California ahead of Tuesday’s pivotal primary, Clinton last month withdrew her promise to participate. Subsequently, an invitation put out to Trump by Sanders for a one-on-debate was at first accepted before the Republican nominee also chickened out.

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More

Laying bare the horrors of Syria’s ongoing civil war, heartbreaking footage of a young boy rescued from the rubble following an airstrike in Aleppo has gone viral. 

Much as last year’s photos of three-year-old Aylan Kurdi—”The Boy on the Beach”—offered a stark reminder of the human toll of the refugee crisis, the images of five-year-old Omran Daqneesh—”The Boy in the Ambulance”—are forcing many to consider the devastating realities of life in war-torn Syria, where more than 250,000 people, including many children, have died in almost five years of war.

The photo and accompanying video, taken and distributed by the activist group Aleppo Media Centre, show Omran being pulled from a partially destroyed building and placed in a chair inside a brightly lit ambulance after an airstrike Wednesday evening. His face and body are covered in ash, dust, and blood. Seemingly dazed, he says nothing.

Watch the video below [warning: graphic content]:

According to news outlets, Omran was taken to a hospital, treated for head wounds, and released. It has been confirmed that though his parents and siblings were also wounded in the attack, they survived. 

Click Here: camiseta rosario central

The Associated Press reports: “An hour after his rescue, the building the boy was in completely collapsed.”

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

Eight people, including five children, are said to have died in the bombing.

As many observers pointed out on social media, young Omran represents thousands of innocent children. As journalist Raf Sanchez—whose initial tweet containing the disturbing image has been shared more than 15,000 times—wrote at the Telegraph, “Tomorrow there will, no doubt, be more strikes and more children like Omran will be hurt.”

Indeed, Sanchez on Thursday posted a video of medics in Aleppo giving CPR to a child on hospital floor. The child later died.

On Thursday, the United Nations suspended its humanitarian task force in Syria amid frustration over intensified fighting that has prevented aid deliveries to besieged areas for at least a month.

“Not one single convoy in one month has reached any of the humanitarian besieged areas—not one single convoy,” U.N. envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura, who chairs the task force and suspended Thursday’s meeting after just eight minutes, told reporters. “And why? Because of one thing: Fighting.”

Earlier this week, the U.N.-mandated Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria warned in a statement: “The situation in Aleppo city has been catastrophic for many years. As unthinkable as it is, the current attacks suggest the agony of its civilians is about to deepen.”

Our work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.

Read More