Category: News

Home / Category: News

Everything you need to know ahead of the Premier League clash at the Etihad Stadium on Sunday afternoon

Manchester City will be without Kevin De Bruyne when they take on Huddersfield in Sunday’s Premier League game at the Etihad Stadium.

De Bruyne will miss between two and three months with a knee injury.



As well as De Bruyne, City could also be without David Silva, who has been struggling with a hip injury in the last couple of weeks.

Danilo is still around a month from full fitness as he recovers from an ankle injury.



Neither side have any suspensions.



City could be unchanged from the team that beat Arsenal last weekend, given De Bruyne started on the bench due to a lack of playing time in pre-season, while David Silva missed out with his hip injury.

David Silva could start on Sunday but that depends on how he has trained during the week, and even then he is likely to only be fit enough for an hour.

Leroy Sane missed out at the Emirates Stadium because Pep Guardiola wanted a right-footer to cut in from the left-hand side to dovetail with Benjamin Mendy in his new role, and Raheem Sterling’s good performance means he is likely to retain his place.

Sergio Aguero missed a great chance against Arsenal but Guardiola and his coaching staff were happy with his overall contribution and that could count in his favour when the Catalan decides whether to stick with the Argentine or bring in Gabriel Jesus.

Click Here: mochila fjallraven



Mathias Jorgensen, AKA Zanka, will miss the game with a muscle injury.

Jonathan Hogg is doubtful for the Terriers with a hip injury, but he will be assessed over the weekend.

Danny Williams is out with an ankle injury, while Erik Durm and Isaac Mpenza are lacking match fitness.





Kick off is 13:30 GMT (6:30 ET) on Sunday August 19 and will be shown on Sky Sports in the United Kingdom. It will be shown on NBC in the United States, and on various channels around the world.

Kluivert tells Roma: I came here to start

October 30, 2019 | News | No Comments

The Dutch winger is determined to force his way into Eusebio Di Francesco’s starting XI, with his outings to date having come from off the bench

Justin Kluivert has told Roma that he wants to “become a starter”, with the Dutchman determined to work his way off the bench.

The 19-year-old winger, who is the son of former Barcelona star Patrick, was a man in demand during the summer transfer window.

His exploits after graduating out of a famed academy system at Ajax saw Europe’s top clubs falling over themselves in an effort to secure his signature.

Kluivert eventually opted to further his development in Serie A, with the decision taken to avoid joining a truly elite club at this stage of his career.

He has had to be patient since arriving in the Italian capital, with two appearances made as a substitute, but he has made it clear that he made a move with the intention of starting every week.

Kluivert told Fox Sports: “I want to become a starter, I have joined Roma for just that.

“My time has not yet arrived, but I have played several minutes and I’m happy. I’m also satisfied with the training sessions . Things are heading in the right direction.

“My house is almost ready and everything is going as planned.

“Everyone knew that the start in Rome would be difficult because they expect so much. At Ajax I was freer on the field, while here I have to play more centrally. I feel more and more comfortable though.”

Despite having only seen 65 minutes of Serie A football so far, Kluivert does already have an assist to his name – having teed up Edin Dzeko during a 1-0 win over Torino on the opening weekend.

Click Here: mochila fjallraven

I really wish U.S. Rep. Katie Hill had not resigned.

The Santa Clarita freshman Democrat has been charged with no crime, is going through what appears to be a miserable divorce, has always been frank about her bisexuality, had a relationship with a member of her campaign staff, but has denied an accusation that she had an affair with a male congressional staffer when she got to Washington, D.C., earlier this year. She is now the subject of a House ethics probe.

Should we have expected more from her? Yes, and I will get to that in a moment.

But she has done nothing — that we know of at least — that should have led her to step down.

If, as has been alleged, she had a consensual sexual relationship with a staffer in her congressional office, the 32-year-old Democrat should have earned a slap on the wrist. To show how seriously Congress has taken that sort of thing (not), it wasn’t even until last year that the House changed its rules to prohibit sexual relationships between members and their employees.

And wouldn’t you know it — the first lawmaker to fall afoul of the new House rule is a woman, and an unabashedly bisexual woman at that.

This is not to say that no male lawmaker has ever lost his job over sexual misconduct. In fact, since October 2017, when the MeToo movement exploded, at least four members of Congress outright resigned, and four said they would not run for reelection.

But let’s look at what they did.

On the Democratic side: U.S. Sen. Al Franken of Minnesota resigned and Rep. Ruben Kihuen of Nevada did not seek reelection after being accused by multiple women of unwanted touching. Rep. John Conyers of Michigan was accused by six former employees of sexual harassment.

In the Republican column: Using government funds, U.S. Rep. Blake Farenthold of Texas settled a sexual harassment complaint with a staffer; Rep. Joe Barton, also of Texas, threatened to report a lover to the U.S. Capitol Police, fearing she might expose his other affairs; Rep. Patrick Meehan of Pennsylvania settled a sexual harassment complaint with a female staffer. And, because I like to save the best for last, Rep. Trent Franks of Arizona offered a staff member $5 million to bear his child; and Rep. Tim Murphy of Pennsylvania, who once served on the House Pro-Life Caucus, asked his pregnant lover to have an abortion.

There is, I daresay, a difference between those and the consensual conduct of which Hill is accused.

Which is why I think that Hill, to her credit, is taking one for her party. In a statement, House Majority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) indicated as much: “She has acknowledged errors in judgment that made her continued service as a member untenable. We must ensure a climate of integrity and dignity in the Congress, and in all workplaces.”

In a video posted Monday morning, a tearful but resolute Hill says she has resigned because “I will not allow myself to be a distraction from the constitutional crisis we are faced with, and the critical work of my colleagues.”

President Trump, on the other hand, has paid off a porn star who says she had sex with him, proudly boasted of sexual assault and still maintains his good graces with his evangelical base. Heck, another Republican has even been accused of stealing money to pursue affairs, and was rewarded by his constituents with reelection in 2018.

That would be U.S. Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Alpine), who has been charged with misusing campaign funds, some of which he allegedly used on trips with his family, others of which he allegedly used on trips with his lovers. He not only didn’t resign, he dug in.

His wife, who pleaded guilty, faces up to five years in prison, and he still hasn’t had the decency to resign. The only thing he has going in his favor is that, as far as I know, there are no naked selfies of him circulating around the internet.

Which brings me to Hill’s biggest sin.

Quite apart from the harsh double standards faced by female politicians — they can’t be too shrill, they have to be likable, on and on — Hill is also being punished, or punishing herself, for one colossally fantastically unbelievably stupid move: Posing for nude photographs, alone and with a woman who appears to be a lover, while running for Congress.

Someone released intimate photos of her that were published by the Daily Mail and the conservative website RedState, which has pursued this story with Kenneth Starr-like glee.

In one of the photos, she’s naked, holding a bong and appears to be stoned. There is, at the top of her thigh, an iron-cross tattoo that RedState has alleged is a Nazi symbol. The cross has been adopted by bikers and Goths too. Does anyone really believe Hill has Nazi sympathies? For heaven’s sake, she ran the largest homeless services organization in California. There is nothing in her record that would indicate such a proclivity.

Also, when the photo was taken in 2017, she was within her legal rights to use cannabis recreationally, but let’s face it, it’s not a good look for a neophyte congresswoman to be photographed naked about to take a bong hit. Even one from cannabis-friendly California.

Whoever disseminated the photos has committed a horrendous invasion of her privacy, and is trying to destroy her. Rightfully, she has contacted U.S. Capitol Police.

A series of text messages were also published by RedState, in which Hill appears to admit being drunk at last spring’s Democratic Party convention in San Francisco, and intimating she has a drinking problem.

Does she? Maybe. And if she does, she should have said so and announced a trip to rehab. Plenty of American politicians admit they have a substance abuse problem, get the help, do the work and resume their responsibilities as elected officials.

Hill became a star of the 2018 campaign. “Vice” followed her around for a documentary series and called her “the most millennial candidate ever.”

After she won the Democratic primary, she faced longtime Republican incumbent Steve Knight. Next to the wooden former cop, she was a breath of fresh air. She beat him by 9 percentage points.

But maybe it was exactly her millennialism that did her in. I can think of nothing more millennial than being destroyed for posing naked for photos that can be disseminated with the push of a button.

There’s one more thing: Her husband, Kenneth Heslep, who says in divorce papers that he’s a stay-at-home spouse, has asked for alimony. Good luck getting it, buddy, now that her career has imploded.


Click Here: liverpool mens jersey

WASHINGTON — 

Elected just a year ago, Rep. Katie Hill quickly became one of the highest-profile members of a celebrated freshman class led by Democratic women.

The 32-year-old Santa Clarita Democrat, who was elected to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-San Francisco) leadership team, knew her rapid political rise would mean she was under a microscope: “Any mistake you make is going to be much more noticeable,” she said in an interview with The Times in March.

The harsh glare caught up with Hill Sunday when she stunned her peers in Congress by announcing she would resign. The statement came amid allegations of affairs with a campaign aide, which she confirmed, and a House staffer, which she denied, as well as the release of several intimate photos, which she blamed on her estranged husband and “the brutality of hateful political operatives.”

Hill’s resignation is the first by a woman in Congress in the wake of the institution’s reckoning with the national #MeToo movement against sexual harassment, which prompted a new rule last year banning relationships between members and staffers.

She is also the first female member to publicly confront the troubling phenomenon of “revenge porn” —the public release of compromising material by a former partner.

Her decision to resign — just days after vowing to fight on despite a congressional ethics probe — was partly prompted by fears that her husband might have taken other compromising photos and would release them, according to a person close to Hill who did not want to be identified speaking about the matter.

Whatever the reasons for Hill’s decision to call it quits, she had few defenders on Capitol Hill, even though some columnists and pundits opined that she should have held on longer and was being treated unfairly. Hill’s gender and sexuality — she identifies as bisexual — raised immediate questions about whether a double standard is being applied to a female lawmaker.

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), whom Hill endorsed for the presidency, said Monday that Hill’s gender is playing a role in the scandal. “Let’s also speak the truth that men and women are not held to the same standards,” Harris told BuzzFeed News. “I mean, look at who’s in the White House.”

Pelosi — who had taken Hill under her wing and helped mentor the millennial lawmaker — on Sunday praised Hill’s contributions to Congress in just 10 months, but also put a strong punctuation mark on her support for Hill.

“She has acknowledged errors in judgment that made her continued service as a member untenable,” Pelosi said in a statement. “We must ensure a climate of integrity and dignity in the Congress, and in all workplaces.”

Other Democrats praised Hill for deciding that she needed to step down, contrasting her with Republicans who are still in office amid similar allegations.

Hill “acknowledged her errors in judgment and is resigning because she values integrity, decency, and accountability. I can’t say the same about several of our colleagues,” said Rep. Harley Rouda (D-Laguna Beach), who like Hill flipped a Republican-held seat in Southern California last year.

Given that her husband might have more photos, she concluded her best option was to leave office and hope the resignation would disincentivize further releases.

Her husband, Kenneth Heslep, has not responded to requests for comment.

Hill informed Pelosi of her decision to resign on a phone call on Sunday. Sources in both camps said Hill notified Pelosi only after her decision was made and that the speaker did not pressure her — and both described the conversation as markedly sad.

“I would have hoped that she had stayed a little bit longer…. But she had made her decision and that was it,” Pelosi said in an interview with a small group of columnists on Monday. “She just made her decision that whatever was coming at her, she decided that she was going to be leaving.”

Pelosi and Hill had developed a close relationship over the last year that began with Hill defending the speaker to the freshmen class amid calls for new House leadership. Several members have told The Times that Pelosi saw herself reflected in Hill’s tenacity and willingness to volunteer for leadership.

But rank-and-file House Democrats speculated Monday that if Hill hadn’t come to the decision to resign, Pelosi or other Democratic leaders might have encouraged her, given the party’s tough line on sexual harassment allegations.

On Monday, Hill portrayed herself as a victim of “revenge porn” and vowed in a 4-minute video posted on her social mediaaccounts that her new cause would be preventing such attacks on other women.

“My fight is not over,” she said. “I will fight to make sure that no one else has to live through what I just experienced.”

Click Here: liverpool mens jersey

“I’m hurt, I’m angry. The path that I saw so clearly for myself is no longer there,” she said, appearing to grow emotional as she apologized to her constituents. “I never thought my imperfections would be weaponized and used to try to destroy me and the community that I have loved.”

Hill has indicated she is cooperating with U.S. Capitol Police to investigate the release of the photos, a potential violation of California law. The person close to Hill said the lawmaker has “extremely strong” evidence that Heslep was behind it, but declined to share details.

Hill’s video may be an effort by her to control the messaging around why she is resigning, California GOP strategist Mike Madrid said, making the scandal about a spouse releasing embarrassing photos, rather than about an alleged inappropriate relationship with an employee. Resigning her office also ends the House Ethics investigation into whether Hill had a relationship with a staff member.

News of a female member of Congress having a relationship with a subordinate, especially a member of leadership, would divert attention from the impeachment inquiry and undermine the idea that the House has addressed its sexual harassment issues, Madrid said.

“Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic leadership do not need that distraction right now. The stakes are much higher than the CA-25 district,” he said. “Unfortunately this poor woman finds herself humiliated on the national stage and she’s expendable to leadership that can’t afford to lose either of those fights.”

On Monday, Hill retweeted a post from a CNN reporter that a GOP operative has more than 700 nude photos of the congresswoman, but added no comment of her own.

Times columnist Doyle McManus in Washington contributed to this report.


Katie Hill’s meteoric congressional career is coming to an abrupt end. The freshman Democrat from Santa Clarita announced Sunday she would resign amid publication of nude photos of her and allegations that she had romantic relationships with congressional and campaign subordinates.

She has acknowledged having a relationship with a campaign staffer but denies having had one with a congressional aide. In a video statement Monday, she blamed her estranged husband and a campaign by “the right-wing media and Republican opponents” for the allegations against her.

Her fall comes less than a year after she was elected to Congress in a district long held by the GOP, and now Republicans see a chance to win back the seat.

Here is what you need to know:

Who is Katie Hill?

Hill, 32, a rising star in the Democratic Party and a protege of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, was one of the highest-profile freshmen elected during the 2018 midterm wave, which gave Democrats control of the House of Representatives.

Hill flipped a Republican seat on the northern edges of Los Angeles, defeating two-term incumbent Steve Knight with much help from volunteers who flooded to support her campaign and from rising progressive entities including Swing Left and Crooked Media. Her supporters included actress Kristen Bell.

Before running, Hill was one of the top executives at PATH, a Los Angeles nonprofit that supports the homeless.

How did the controversy start?

On Oct. 10, the conservative website RedState published a story with comments from Hill’s husband, Kenneth Heslep, who filed for divorce this year, alleging his wife was having a romantic affair with her congressional legislative director, Graham Kelly. Hill has denied that allegation.

But the scandal didn’t truly blow up on social media until RedState published a follow-up story on Oct. 18 alleging that Hill, who is bisexual, and her husband had a three-way relationship with a campaign staffer, who was not identified. RedState published photos it had been given of Hill with the female staffer and said it had more “intimate photographs of the women, which we have chosen not to publish.” RedState alleged that the existence of the photos could put Hill at risk of blackmail. The British tabloid the Daily Mail also published sensitive photos of Hill.

What are the rules?

New House ethics rules, adopted last year, forbid members from having sexual relationships with their staff. House investigators have also previously found that inappropriate sexual advances on campaign staff constitute a violation of House ethics rules, noting that “service as an elected official involves power imbalances that members must be careful not to exploit.” The House Ethics Committee said last week that Hill was under investigation.

In the workplace, relationships between supervisors and subordinates are generally strongly discouraged, often because they raise questions about the subordinate’s ability to consent and because they can create actual or apparent conflicts of interest if the employee receives other professional favors or unusual treatment.

Those principles were highlighted in divorce records reviewed by The Times, in which Heslep said that Hill had used her influence to get him jobs at PATH between 2011 until 2014. At one point, Hill’s “employer was concerned about nepotism and how it looked that she was my boss,” Heslep said in the filing.

Heslep later rose to a regional management position and implied that his position was the result of favoritism by Hill. “I only have a high school diploma but I was able to get this job primarily because of [Hill’s] influence,” Heslep wrote in his divorce filing. “I did not have any special qualifications for these jobs.”

Heather Wilson, a spokeswoman for PATH, said in a statement: “We have a conflict of interest policy that covers employees and their family members. Every potential employee is fully vetted for adherence in accordance with all of our policies before they are hired. There was no direct supervisory relationship between Hill and Kenny Heslep during the time periods they were employed at PATH.”

Heslep, who said he has been an unemployed stay-at-home husband since 2014, is seeking spousal support from Hill.

How did Hill respond?

Hill has acknowledged having had a relationship with the campaign staffer, but she has denied having a relationship with Kelly, calling the allegation “absolutely false.”

“I am saddened that the deeply personal matter of my divorce has been brought into public view and the vindictive claims of my ex have now involved the lives and reputations of unrelated parties,” Hill said in a statement last week.

Hill also said the explicit photographs of her with the campaign staffer had been “published by Republican operatives on the internet without my consent,” and she contacted U.S. Capitol Police.

On Sunday, Hill resigned, saying in a statement “this is what needs to happen so that the good people who supported me will no longer be subjected to the pain inflicted by my abusive husband and the brutality of hateful political operatives who seem to happily provide a platform to a monster who is driving a smear campaign built around cyber exploitation.”

Hill added: “Having private photos of personal moments weaponized against me has been an appalling invasion of my privacy. It’s also illegal, and we are currently pursuing all of our available legal options.”

Are the leaked photos illegal?

That’ll be up to prosecutors and the courts, if they get involved. Both California and Washington, D.C., have laws forbidding the malicious sharing of explicit images of someone without the person’s consent.

Washington’s statute forbids both the sharing and publication of explicit private images when the disclosure is nonconsensual and meant to inflict harm, but it includes an exclusion for when “the disclosure or publication of a sexual image is made in the public interest, including the reporting of unlawful conduct,” which would be a likely 1st Amendment defense for RedState.

California’s statute forbids the sharing of such images when “the person distributing the image knows or should know that distribution of the image will cause serious emotional distress, and the person depicted suffers that distress.” The state exempts distribution “made in the course of reporting an unlawful activity.”

What about Hill’s seat?

A Democratic California assemblywoman, Christy Smith, has already announced plans to run to replace Hill in California’s 25th Congressional District.

Latino Victory, an advocacy group, said in a tweet that “we look forward to recruiting and supporting a strong Latino Democrat to run & once again win this seat in 2020.”

Several Republicans already had filed to challenge Hill. Knight, whom Hill beat by 9 percentage points in 2018, is considering a run and is expected to make an announcement soon.

Former Trump advisor George Papadopoulos hinted on Twitter that he was interested in running, writing: “Someone has to step up. I love my state too much to see it run down by candidates like Hill. All talk, no action, and a bunch of sell outs.”

Papadopoulos was sentenced to prison last year for lying to federal agents about his interactions with Russian intermediaries during the 2016 presidential campaign.

Times staff writer Seema Mehta contributed to this report.


Click Here: liverpool mens jersey

The wildfires engulfing California this month have burned some of the same areas where other major fires have destroyed thousands of homes in recent years.

But while Gov. Gavin Newsom and state lawmakers have announced plans that could rein in Pacific Gas & Electric Co. and other utilities since this year’s blazes began, no one has formally proposed robust limits on home building in areas at risk of wildfire.

On Sunday, residents of Coffey Park, a neighborhood in Santa Rosa that was leveled in the Tubbs fire in 2017, received evacuation orders over the Kincade fire, which is currently ripping through Sonoma County. The community has yet to see damage from the new blaze, but some areas burned by the Kincade fire overlap with those affected two years ago — and fire officials fear the flames could grow when Diablo winds return to Northern California later this week.

Many homes have only just been rebuilt in Coffey Park. But the burnt trees that surround them serve as constant reminders of the Tubbs fire.

In June, the UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies released a poll that showed that three-quarters of California voters believe the state should restrain home building in areas at high risk of wildfires. The poll, prepared for The Times, revealed bipartisan support for such restrictions after deadly fires wiped out tens of thousands of homes across the state in the last two years.

“The voters think there should be limits,” said Mark DiCamillo, director of the Berkeley IGS Poll.

The Times is offering fire coverage for free today. Please consider a subscription to support our journalism.

The survey revealed broad backing across party lines, demographic groups and all regions in California for restricting growth in wildfire zones. Nearly 85% of Democrats support doing so compared with 57% of Republicans and 72% of independent voters.

At least 66% of respondents in every region backed the idea, including the non-Bay Area northern section of the state. That includes the area surrounding Paradise, which was almost entirely destroyed in last fall’s Camp fire and where many homeowners have said they hope to rebuild and in many cases are doing so.

Overall, 37% of voters surveyed said they supported strongly limiting new home building in wildfire areas, with an additional 38% saying they somewhat supported the idea.

Despite voters’ willingness to restrict growth in wildfire areas, Newsom and lawmakers have not discussed the idea comprehensively, alongside other options to prevent destructive infernos. State leaders have instead focused their discussions on utility companies’ financial responsibility for the blazes, how to pay for damages from wildfires and cutting back vegetation and other ways to manage the state’s forests. One bill that would have added extra restrictions on cities and counties’ ability to approve housing in high-risk zones was held in a legislative committee earlier this year.

Last year Ken Pimlott, the recently retired head of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, said that government should consider stopping home building in threatened communities because of the substantial loss of property and lives.

But in an interview with the Associated Press this spring, Newsom rejected it.

“There’s something that is truly Californian about the wilderness and the wild and pioneering spirit,” Newsom said. “I’m not advocating for” no building.

Stanford University’s Michael Wara, who recently served on a state wildfire commission, said the scale of recent fires is influencing how Californians think about development, even those whose property is safe.

“They wake up and go outside and they can’t breathe and there’s ash on their car,” said Wara, who directs the school’s climate and energy policy program. “It’s not something you read about in the newspaper. It’s something you experience.”

But Wara said any decision to limit growth in fire zones remains politically difficult. People who own land or might want to build in those areas strongly prefer to maintain the status quo.

“This is an issue where there’s concentrated very powerful interests that have a lot to lose by changing the rules,” he said.

It’s also possible that voters might support the idea for limiting growth but not the details of what a plan might look like, said DiCamillo, the pollster. A recent Cal Fire report said 1 in 4 Californians live in areas considered at high risk for wildfires, including in suburban Southern California and the Bay Area.

People who live in parts of Marin County may not realize they reside in one of these zones when answering that question, he said. “They’re probably thinking about all these rural areas.”

The online survey of 4,435 California voters took place June 4 to 10 and had an overall margin of sampling error of plus or minus 2.5%.


Click Here: liverpool mens jersey

BEIRUT — 

The locals knew him as Abu Mohammed Salama, an animal feed wholesaler who lived in a compound on the edge of Syria’s border with Turkey, on the outskirts of a town called Barisha. Salama was friendly enough, residents said Monday, but mostly kept to himself.

So they were surprised to learn about his secret life as the commander of an extremist group affiliated with Al Qaeda — and even more surprised to learn that he had been harboring a rival extremist, Abu Bakr Baghdadi, the founder of Islamic State.

“Who would come here — to a village with nothing?” asked Ayman Abdul Ghani, a 33-year-old medical activist working with Barisha’s local council. “Let’s be logical.”

Baghdadi died last weekend during a raid by U.S. forces on the compound in Barisha, according to President Trump and other U.S. officials. Trapped in a tunnel on the property, Baghdadi blew himself up, killing three children in the process. Salama, which was believed to have been a pseudonym for Abu Mohammed Halabi, the leader of the extremist group Guardians of the Religion, was also cut down in the raid, residents say, and his body was taken away by the special operatives.

In the aftermath of the raid, questions remain about how Baghdadi came to the squat compound, where Salama had lived with his eight children for three years.

Barisha, about 30 miles west of the city of Aleppo and a few miles south of the border with Turkey, had largely escaped the punishing air campaign waged by Syrian and Russian warplanes over northern Syria in recent years, mostly because it was so unimportant.

That quiet was punctured just before 11 p.m. Saturday, when helicopters swarmed over Salama’s house. Rapid cracks of machine-gun fire and tracer rounds flared in the sky.

“There was just shooting everywhere. We heard someone on the ground shooting at the helicopters, then they responded. We just started panicking,” said Alaa, a 33-year-old worker with the local council who gave only his first name for fear of reprisals.

Though Alaa’s house was more than 400 yards away, when he went to his window to see what was happening, a bullet pierced the thick frosted glass, smacked into a picture hanging on the wall and sent a shower of shards on his children.

“We didn’t even dare turn on our lights to see what was happening,” said Alaa.

Later, a shepherd living in a tent next to Salama’s house (he too had only exchanged greetings with Salama) brought eight children, all younger than 10, to Alaa’s neighborhood, Alaa said. The shepherd said that they had been handed to him by the operatives storming the compound and that he was to take care of them.

The children, Alaa said, were now with the authorities who control surrounding Idlib province, which is the last part of Syria still held by forces opposed to Syrian President Bashar Assad. Syria has been torn by civil war since 2011, although Assad, with Russian and Iranian help, is now back in control of most of the country.

The same opposition forces had also been fighting against Islamic State, adding to the mystery of how Baghdadi wound up in Salama’s house in Barisha.

Before the civil war, the village had been virtually abandoned, Abdul Ghani said in a phone interview. Most people left to find work elsewhere in the country, he said. Those who did stay worked in the sparse olive groves, or the small wheat fields near ancient Roman ruins. It was the civil war that brought many of its original inhabitants back, swelling the village’s population from less than 1,000 before the war to 12,000.

About 4,000 of Syria’s displaced had also settled in Barisha, many of them poor people unable to afford living elsewhere or who wanted to be near the Turkish border.

Salama was thought to have come as one of those internally displaced, Alaa said.

“He came almost three years ago, bought a house that was still under construction, finished it and put a fence around it,” he added. Salama also enrolled his children in the school, and seemed to have no qualms about being seen, though he rarely had visitors, except to hook up internet service or refill his water tanks.

Though services were few, said Abdul Qader Abdul Ghafour, the top civilian administrator in Barisha, the area was controlled by a onetime Al Qaeda affiliate known as the Committee for the Liberation of Syria and was thought to be secure. Although Baghdadi had once been an Al Qaeda member, he broke away from the group when he formed Islamic State and the two groups had become sworn enemies.

“If we had known this person was here, of course we would have captured him,” Abdul Ghafour said in an interview Monday.

The hunt for Baghdadi had begun well before Islamic State lost the last of its territory this year. At its zenith, the group controlled an area roughly the size of Britain, with anywhere from eight to 12 million people under its rule.

As Islamic State was squeezed between rival U.S.-led and Russian-supported campaigns, teams of special operatives and spies roamed the group’s onetime bastions to track down Baghdadi. Reports would breathlessly declare he was killed in an airstrike or wounded and dying, but there was never confirmation.

After the U.S.-led coalition declared victory over the group this year, there was no sign of him, save for a few audio and video recordings in which he vowed Islamic State would still fight.

To reach Barisha, Baghdadi would have had to traverse hundreds of miles, through desolate deserts as well as urban centers and major highways, from the group’s stronghold in the northeast. If he had gone through Syria, he would have had to navigate a Swiss-cheese landscape of influence and control by groups of different loyalties, including the Syrian government and its allies, as well as opposition and Islamist factions.

A senior U.S. State Department official described Idlib province as a chaotic mishmash of competing groups. “It is as messy a mix as you have in northeast Syria,” the official said.

It was also possible Baghdadi wanted to remain near the Turkish border. In the early days of Islamic State’s formation, that border had been the conduit for the tens of thousands of fighters who came from 100 countries to join its ranks.

Turkey, amid increasing pressure from the U.S. and a growing Islamic State threat in its own territory, finally sealed the border. Yet many militants were thought to have escaped to Turkey during Islamic State’s slow demise.

Click Here: liverpool mens jersey

Baghdadi could also have blended in with the many Iraqi families, refugees who fled either with or from Islamic State into Syria. Many of them now live in camps in the steppes of the country’s north. Idlib province, commentators say, is infiltrated by Islamic State sleeper cells more than willing to hide their caliph.

Some say Salama was part of such a cell. Whatever his loyalties were, opposition activists reported that Salama was more than a wholesaler. Barisha residents were trying to reconcile that with the friendly man they knew.

“He was like any other refugee,” Alaa said.

Times staff writer Patrick J. McDonnell in Qamishli, Syria, contributed to this report.


WASHINGTON — 

A president who got booed at the World Series has learned one of Washington’s oldest lessons: Want a friend, get a dog.

President Trump, who revealed an astonishing measure of detail Sunday about the special forces operation in which Islamic State leader Abu Bakr Baghdadi was killed, gave the public another detail about the raid on Monday — a photo of the Belgian Malinois that was injured during the firefight.

Trump tweeted a picture of the dog after a number of reporters had inquired about it and praised it for having done “such a GREAT JOB.” Its name remains classified, however.

Gen. Mark Milley, the Joint Chiefs chairman, told reporters at the Pentagon several hours before Trump tweeted that the military was intent on protecting the dog’s identity.

“The dog is still in theater,” Milley explained.

Trump, during his 48-minute appearance in the White House Diplomatic Room on Sunday, told reporters that U.S. forces suffered no casualties or injuries in the raid on Baghdadi’s complex in northwest Syria, but disclosed that the dog was injured.

“Our K-9, as they call — I call it a dog, a beautiful dog, a talented dog — was injured and brought back. But we had no soldier injured,” he said.


Click Here: liverpool mens jersey

WASHINGTON — 

President Trump celebrated the death of Abu Bakr Baghdadi as he has other major events of his presidency — with grievances, partisan jabs and confounding statements and tweets.

Even Democrats acknowledged that a president battling an impeachment probe and bipartisan criticism for pulling U.S. troops out of northern Syria got a much-needed win that could help his 2020 reelection campaign.

“Unfortunately, it’s very good for Trump because it kind of credentials him at a time when his profile on foreign policy and national security has taken a major hit,” said Celinda Lake, a Democratic pollster who is advising former Vice President Joe Biden’s presidential campaign.

Yet a win for Trump never comes without complications. Trump’s vivid description on Sunday of Baghdadi “whimpering and crying and screaming” was undermined Monday when Gen. Mark A. Milley, chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff, told a Pentagon news conference that he could not confirm those details and did not “know the source” of Trump’s information.

Defense Secretary Mark Esper had already thrown cold water on Trump’s account on Sunday, declining to confirm it in a televised interview.

Trump said he might release some video of the Special Forces raid that led the elusive leader of Islamic State to blow up a suicide vest in a tunnel rather than surrender. The Pentagon had aerial surveillance of the site, but it’s not known if U.S. forces wore body cameras that offered additional video.

Trump also tweeted a photo of the military K-9 dog that the White House said had chased Baghdadi into the tunnel. The Pentagon refused to release the dog’s name, saying it was classified because the animal was still on duty in the war zone.

Trump appeared undaunted by criticisms of his rhetoric — or of the loud boos and chants to “Lock him up!” that he received while attending the World Series game Sunday night in Washington — boasting that Baghdadi was “dead as a doornail” and attacking his predecessors in the White House.

“He should have been killed years ago,” Trump told a conference of police chiefs in Chicago. “Another president should’ve gotten him.”

Trump’s campaign sent text messages and emails to supporters that took a similar tone — mixing cheers for the the accomplishment with longstanding complaints that Trump is under unfair attack from the media.

Politicians often use current events to raise money or build supporter networks. But Trump broke with tradition by quickly slamming his political opponents, a tactic more likely to please ardent supporters than win converts.

“This is something that a president can use to unify people and build support for his national security agenda, but it’s generally done in somewhat of a subdued way,” said Ryan Williams, a Republican consultant.

Williams, an aide on Mitt Romney’s 2012 presidential campaign, recalled that President Obama delivered a solemn address in May 2011 after a CIA-led team covertly entered Pakistan to kill Osama bin Laden.

Though Trump is eager to claim credit for the Baghdadi mission, he refused to give Obama credit for taking out Bin Laden, the mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks.

“Stop congratulating Obama for killing Bin Laden. The Navy Seals killed Bin Laden,” he tweeted during a 2012 presidential debate after Romney gave Obama kudos.

In a statement Monday, Biden called the Baghdadi mission a “win for American national security” and praised Trump for giving it the go-ahead.

“But as more details of the raid emerge, it’s clear that this victory was not due to Donald Trump’s leadership,” Biden said. “It happened despite his ineptitude as commander in chief.”

A senior State Department official said the Pentagon had accelerated the mission because of the “chaotic situation” that followed Trump’s abrupt decision this month to withdraw U.S. troops from northern Syria, abandoning U.S.-backed Kurds in the area.

The political impact of the Baghdadi raid could shift over time.

Democrats cited Bin Laden’s death frequently during the 2012 campaign, claiming “Bin Laden is dead and General Motors is alive” to highlight Obama’s top foreign and domestic accomplishments, including rescuing the automobile industry after the 2008 recession.

Polls showed Obama got a bounce in his approval ratings, but it disappeared in a few months.

Charlie Cook, editor of the nonpartisan Cook Political Report, predicted a similar outcome for Trump, arguing that his core support seldom shifts, for good news or bad.

“If 4.2 percent GDP growth in the 2nd quarter of 2017 and 50-year lows in unemployment don’t help him much, this probably won’t,” he said in an email.

Yet Lake, the Biden pollster, argued that Obama was helped in the long run — and Trump may be as well — even if polls don’t reflect a clear bump.

For Obama, the Bin Laden raid helped assuage doubts among conservative and male voters who tend to view African American, female and Democratic candidates less favorably on foreign policy and defense, she said.

For Trump, the Baghdadi mission could prevent defections from independent voters concerned about his lackluster foreign policy record, including his battles with European allies, his failures to nail down accords with China and North Korea and his abandonment of U.S. military allies in Syria.

Trump now has a response to those criticisms.

“To me, it’s more of an influence and with the whole building block of things rather than a direct hit,” Lake said. “And those building blocks are rearranged here.”

Times staff writer Tracy Wilkinson contributed to this report.


Click Here: liverpool mens jersey

SOUTHERN SECTION GIRLS’ VOLLEYBALL

DIVISION 8

Second round, Monday

Click Here: liverpool mens jersey

Santa Clarita Christian d. Coastal Christian, 25-9, 22-25, 26-24, 25-23

DIVISION 9

Second round, Monday

Temecula Prep d. Academy for Careers & Exploration, 25-19, 25-16, 22-25, 25-23

Redlands Adventist d. La Verne Lutheran, 11-25, 25-19, 25-14, 20-25, 15-10

Mesa Grande d. Shandon 25-23, 25-7, 25-10