Category: News

Home / Category: News

Share

15th Oct 2019

Ever since the Batman franchise rebooted itself post-Christopher Nolan, it’s suffered from a curious lack of Catwoman. With Robert Pattinson’s recent casting, the DC Extended Universe is now on its second Batman and still has two distinct Jokers running around. Yet, the brass that be has left those famous cat ears and whip go unclaimed. Curious, considering that complicated female characters, including Margot Robbie’s Harley Quinn and Gal Gadot’s Wonder Woman, seem to be one of the few things everyone can agree that the DCEU does well.

Though, the introduction of the new Pattinson-played Batman presented the perfect opportunity to introduce his famous half-friend/half-foe into the mix.

Now, Variety reports that Zoë Kravitz has been cast in the film as the character (following, mind you, a week of head-scratching, and frankly rude, rumours that Warner Brothers execs were searching for a “Zoë Kravitz type” without reportedly considering Kravitz herself).

Though, for those who know Kravitz best from her work as a mopey young hippy in Big Little Lies, this might come as a surprise. Catwoman may have been a lot of things in her nearly 80-year history, but Monterey mom isn’t one of them. Though, there’s more than enough other items on Kravitz’s IMDB page that make us convinced she’s right for the part.

For one thing, she already is Catwoman
The last time Catwoman technically popped up on the big screen was in 2017’s The Lego Batman Movie where she was voiced by, of course, Kravitz. The character doesn’t have a major role in the film, though, which may actually work in Kravitz’s favour.

She has her action and superhero credentials
Kravitz has previously played Toast the Knowing, one of the “Five Wives,” in Mad Max: Fury Road and has done previous superhero duty as Angel Salvadore in X-Men: First Class. She also recently voiced not one, but two different versions of Mary Jane in Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse.

Click Here: mochila fjallraven

Her indie work proves her acting chops
Though, if there’s one entry in her filmography that makes us think Kravitz has the proper chops to capture the bad girl charm of Catwoman completely it might be her turn in the 2017 neo-noir film Gemini. Kravitz plays a spoiled movie star with a dark secret or two who is murdered and leaves her assistant to solve the crime. It’s kind of a shame, however, that Kravitz’s character has to disappear in the middle of the film to make the plot work, because you miss her every second she’s off screen.

Unfortunately the casting news doesn’t elaborate much on how Catwoman will figure into the plot of the movie, or whether she’ll play Batman’s direct foe or more of a rival, but we guess we’ll find out when the film is released in 2021.

This story originally appeared on Wmagazine.com

As one of the most-loved 80s style icons, it doesn’t come as a surprise that Princess Diana’s timeless approach to dressing is still revered. From her understated off-duty jeans and T-shirts to her sweetheart-neckline ball gowns and everything in between, Princess Diana’s approach to fashion has provided us with ample sartorial inspiration, even long after her passing. But it seems we aren’t alone in looking to the late Princess for help when choosing our outfits, as both Kate Middleton and Meghan Markle have channelled their late mother-in-law on a number of occasions. Whether it be a power suit or a printed dress, Middleton and Markle have proved they too draw some serious inspiration from the Princess and her timeless style. Below, we’ve rounded up all our favourite times the royals looked to the Princess to inspire their own outfits.

Click Here: Fjallraven Kanken Art Spring Landscape Backpacks

Kate Middleton and Princess Diana

Meghan Markle and Princess Diana

Share

15th Oct 2019

When Queen Elizabeth II arrived at The Palace of Westminster for the 65th State Opening of Parliament, where she traditionally gives an annual speech addressing the House of Commons and House of Lords, she did so wearing a royal tradition-breaking outfit.

Accompanied by the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall, the monarch was seated at the throne, and while she was dressed in “Royal Robes” for the occasion, the absence of the Imperial State Crown atop her head was duly noted.

For what has been reported as only the third time in a total of 65 years, Queen Elizabeth opted not to wear the Imperial State Crown, which sat on display atop a red velvet cushion beside her as she gave her speech. For reasons that are not yet apparent, the Queen chose to wear the lighter George IV State Diadem instead.

The first time the royal went without the Imperial State Crown at the State Opening of Parliament was in 1974, when there were two general elections, as People reports. The second time was in 2017, when the publication reports there was a snap election and the monarch wore day dress instead.

While royal watchers have been left to come up with their own theories as to why Queen Elizabeth broke royal tradition, many have come to the conclusion that the Imperial State Crown, which features 2868 diamonds, 17 sapphires, 11 emeralds and 269 pearls, and weighs almost 1.5 kilograms, has gotten a little too heavy for the 93-year-old to carry on her head.

This may well be true, given that just last year, in BBC documentary The Coronation, the Queen confessed: “You can’t look down to read the speech; you have to take the speech up. Because if you did, your neck would break; it would fall off. So there are some disadvantages to crowns, but otherwise they’re quite important things.”

Click Here: Fjallraven Kanken Art Spring Landscape Backpacks

While she may have opted not to wear the crown, there is no denying the George IV State Diadem is no less regal. The Queen accessorised the substitute piece with her diamond Coronation necklace, and a white Angela Kelly dress.

According to the royal family’s official Instagram account, ‘This is the 65th occasion on which Her Majesty has opened Parliament – every year of her reign except 1959 and 1963 (whilst pregnant).” No small feat.

What makes Tokyo’s street style so endlessly entertaining? The whimsical detailing, the futuristic silhouettes, or the fact that residents continue to set trends instead of following them? Whatever the appeal, there‘s no better time than during fashion week to observe the city’s best dressed.

For spring/summer 2020, the biannual showcase returns from October 14 to 20. Among its star attractions is Tomo Koizumi, the Tokyo-based talent who has been captivating audiences with his frothy ballgowns over the past two seasons at New York Fashion Week. Then there’s cult label DressedUndressed, experimental brand Mikio Sakabe and streetwear-inspired Cinoh. 

Also worth adding to your calendar is the Face A-J, a fashion and cultural exchange programme between Africa and Japan, which sees creatives from both regions come together for a series of presentations, pop-ups and panel discussions. On this occasion, visiting designers will include 2019 LVMH Prize nominee Kenneth Ize and winner Thebe Magugu.

Click Here: Fjallraven Kanken Art Spring Landscape Backpacks

Away from the catwalk, the streets of the Japanese capital are packed with sartorial inspiration. Browse the most memorable looks below, as captured by photographer Kenta Iriguchi.

Libra

Librans are known for liking harmony and are renowned for their co-operative, fair and balanced outlook on life. A social star sign, Librans enjoy wearing elevated fashion for their many social engagements. Look to elegant midi block-heeled open-toed mules from brands like Bally for sandals that provide both a balanced, harmonious silhouette and a day-to-night practicality. A gilded hue will provide that extra special something for the upcoming festive season.

Shop sandals at VOSN, here.

Scorpio

Mysterious, passionate, honest and powerful, Scorpios tend to gravitate towards darker colours in their footwear and wardrobe choices in line with their enigmatic nature. Their powerful charisma and penchant for midnight hues translate to a sandal style that is polished, straightforward yet also intriguing. A flat, luxuriously-crafted black leather slide from a brand like Dear Frances combines all these elements in one sandal and is an on-trend option for the Scorpio sandal wearer.

Shop sandals at VOSN, here.

Sagittarius

Open-minded, travel-loving, humourous Sagittarians require a sandal style that is exceptionally practical for travelling while also including an element of light-hearted fun. Think flat sandal styles with a heel strap and practical cross-over detailing for maximum comfort in a bright hue like Dear Frances’s Bebe sandal in indigo—pretty and practical.

Shop sandals at VOSN, here.

Capricorn

With understated quality and fine craftmanship important to this responsible earth sign, heritage luxury brands such as Bally are Capricorns “sole”-mate. A flat or midi backless mule in a neutral or black high-quality leather will serve the Capricorn well this summer.

Shop sandals at VOSN, here.

Aquarius

Visionary and original, Aquarians enjoy left-of-centre fashion as much as they enjoy solving challenging problems. Aquarians will never follow the rules in any arena, so why would that be any different in their sandal choice? Being a rule-breaker and an original lends itself to unexpected sandal choices like a wedge. Wedges defy categorisation much like an Aquarian and come in a variety of styles and heel heights. Look to Edward Meller for a slew of wedge options that will satisfy even the most unconventional Aquarian.

Shop sandals at VOSN, here.

Pisces

19 February – 20 March

Artistic, romantic, gentle and friendly, those born under the Pisces zodiac sign should look to pastel hues like lilac, baby pink and sea green when selecting their footwear. As for which style of shoe to select, a sweet midi-heeled strappy sandal—like Windsor Smith’s Jeanne lilac leather sandal—is always a good option for this water sign.

Shop sandals at VOSN, here.

Aries

21 March – 20 April

Bold and fashion-forward, only the latest trend will do for Aries the ram. The naked kitten-heel sandal is the on-trend sandal choice of 2019 and those born under this fire sign need to look no further than this trend. Already own multiple pairs? Add another hue from an Instagram-favourite brand like Mara & Mine, because as every Aries knows, you can never have enough shoes. 

Shop sandals at VOSN, here.

Taurus

21 April – 21 May

Reliable, loyal, practical, tactile Taureans combine their reliability with a love of beautiful objects including fashion. Their tactile nature makes velvet or satin ideal shoe fabrics to look to when selecting footwear, while a sandal with a mid-heel will keep the shoe within the practical brief. Look to options like the Elena light pink satin sandal or Ginny mule in berry velvet from Sol Sana for this season’s sandal selection.

Shop sandals at VOSN, here.

Gemini

22 May – 21 June

The two sides of a Gemini translate to footwear that is flexible and versatile, easily able to cover any mood or situation the Gemini is in. A toe post sandal with a number of different details such as an interesting print, unusual sole height or embellishment will cater to the different moods of the Gemini in just one look. Vionic Shoes Australia has a number of stellar options that will fit the bill. 

Shop sandals at VOSN, here.

Cancer

22 June – 22 July

Emotional, intuitive and persuasive, this water sign is guided by their heart and requires sandals that keep them grounded. Playing it safe is important to this water sign so neutral colours are key when making any shoe or fashion choices. Cancerians lead with emotion so a sweet, pretty kitten heel with one or two minimal straps over the foot arch or toe are a go-to style for this sign and Mara & Mine’s Xanthe kitten heels in custard are an ideal purchase this season.

Shop sandals at VOSN, here.

Leo 

23 July – 23 August

Outgoing, good-humoured, generous Leos need a party sandal that will stand up to even the most rigorous social schedule and be the life of the party—just like their wearer. Only a high-heeled metallic ankle-strap sandal will do, think: Steve Madden’s Faith sandal in rose gold.

Shop sandals at VOSN, here.

Virgo

24 August – 22 September

For the hardworking, analytic Virgo, footwear needs to work as hard as they do but also channel an intelligent chic look. Gladiator sandals are an option for this earth star sign with the flat sole and straps taking care of the practical side while also adding a smart edge. Sol Sana’s Clash ecru eyelet sandals are a style to consider.

Shop sandals at VOSN, here.

WASHINGTON — 

Facing intense scrutiny from President Trump and his Republican allies, Hunter Biden said Sunday that he will step down from the board of directors of a Chinese-backed private equity firm at the end of the month as part of a pledge not to work on behalf of any foreign-owned companies should his father win the presidency.

Biden, the 49-year-old son of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, revealed his plan in an internet post written by his attorney, George Mesires, who outlined a defense of the younger Biden’s work in Ukraine and China, which has emerged as one of Trump’s chief lines of attack against Joe Biden despite no proof of impropriety.

“Hunter makes the following commitment: Under a Biden administration, Hunter will readily comply with any and all guidelines or standards a President Biden may issue to address purported conflicts of interest, or the appearance of such conflicts, including any restrictions related to overseas business interests. In any event, Hunter will agree not to serve on boards of, or work on behalf of, foreign-owned companies,” Mesires wrote.

He continued: “He will continue to keep his father personally uninvolved in his business affairs, while availing himself as necessary and appropriate to the Office of the White House counsel to help inform his application of the Biden administration’s guidelines or standards to his business decision-making.”

Joe Biden, speaking to reporters after a union forum in suburban Des Moines, said his son did not discuss that decision with him before posting the statement.

“No one has asserted my son did a single thing wrong,” the former vice president added, pounding his finger into the podium, “except a lying president.”

He promised to bar his family members from occupying any office within the White House and said they won’t “sit in meetings as if they are a Cabinet member.” That was a jab at Trump, who taps daughter Ivanka and her husband, Jared Kushner, as advisors. Joe Biden did not say if his pledge meant that Jill Biden, his wife, would not get the office traditionally assigned to first ladies, should he win.

He further vowed that no one in his family will have “any business relationship with anyone that relates to a foreign corporation or foreign country.”

Hunter Biden’s work overseas sits at the center of the House impeachment inquiry into Trump, who has admitted to asking foreign powers to investigate the younger Biden’s business dealings abroad.

The White House released a rough transcript of a call in which Trump asks Ukraine’s new president, Volodymyr Zelensky, to investigate Biden’s family and Ukraine’s role in the 2016 election that put Trump in office. Trump has also encouraged China to dig into Hunter Biden’s work in that country, asserting without evidence that he earned $1.5 billion from a “sweetheart” business deal there.

The president’s personal attorney, Rudolph W. Giuliani, is also under increasing scrutiny for his efforts to dig into Hunter Biden’s business background. Late last week, two businessmen involved in Giuliani’s efforts to investigate Hunter Biden’s dealings in Ukraine were charged with federal campaign finance violations.

Still, Republicans reacted to news of Hunter Biden’s decision to step away from the Chinese-backed BHR Equity Investment Fund Management Co. with deep skepticism.

“I think this is just another way to save a flailing campaign that’s going down,” Georgia Rep. Doug Collins, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures.” “He knows he’s in trouble and this is just another way to try and detract attention.”

On the same show, White House counselor Kellyanne Conway said Hunter Biden “should have done this quite a while ago.”

Mesires noted repeatedly that there is no evidence of wrongdoing against Hunter Biden, despite intensifying attacks from Trump before the 2020 election.

“Despite extensive scrutiny, at no time has any law enforcement agency, either domestic or foreign, alleged that Hunter engaged in wrongdoing at any point during his five-year term,” Mesires said in his Sunday post of Biden’s experience in Ukraine.

The attorney wrote that Hunter Biden worked as an unpaid board member for BHR Equity Investment Fund Management Co. “based on his interest in seeking ways to bring Chinese capital to international markets.”

Click Here: liverpool mens jersey

“To date, Hunter has not received any compensation for being on BHR’s board of directors,” Mesires said. “He has not received any return on his investment; there have been no distributions to BHR shareholders since Hunter obtained his equity interest.”

One of Biden’s Democratic presidential rivals praised the move, noting that Trump’s children are openly trading on his name in business deals around the world while Trump occupies the Oval Office.

“I think it demonstrates the difference in standards relative to the White House,” said Pete Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Ind.

“I mean, here you have Hunter Biden stepping down from a position in order to make sure, even though there’s been no accusation of wrongdoing — doing something just to make sure there’s not even the appearance of a conflict of interests, while, in the White House, the president of the United States is a walking conflict of interest,” he said.


SACRAMENTO — 

Ten years ago, Mitrice Richardson was released from the Los Angeles County sheriff’s Malibu/Lost Hills Station just after midnight, left to find her way home through a remote area, alone and on foot, with no money or phone.

When her body was located 11 months later, questions were raised about why the Sheriff’s Department let her go at an hour when there were few transportation options available and after she showed signs of a mental health crisis; she had been arrested after failing to pay her bill at a Malibu restaurant and exhibiting what was described as “strange behavior.”

Richardson’s case was one of the first late-night jail releases to draw scrutiny in California. But it wasn’t until another young black woman, Jessica St. Louis, died after leaving an Alameda County jail nine years later that California legislators sought to change a practice critics say is unfair and dangerous.

On Saturday, Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed legislation to change the rules. Senate Bill 42 would have required county jails to allow those being released to stay until daylight hours if they chose, and to provide a safe place to wait for a ride and for the released inmate to charge a mobile phone while waiting after business hours.

Newsom cited the provision allowing inmates to wait until morning to leave as a costly mandate on local governments that would have to be reimbursed by the state. He wrote in his veto message that, although late-night jail releases were “simply an unsafe practice, resulting in many tragic and preventable outcomes over the years,” they should be addressed with a more “tailored” approach that “does not put the state treasury on the hook for local jail operations costs.”

State Sen. Nancy Skinner (D-Berkeley), the bill’s author, said the understood the budget concerns but “the reality here is lives are at stake.”

“This notion that there is a more targeted way to do it that would cost less, no one has recommended yet,” she said. “There are not very many people released from jail that are going to opt to stay in the safe place until business hours. There just won’t be that many, but if it saves even one life, that’s good enough.”

Skinner took up the issue after learning about St. Louis’ death, which occurred a few hours after she was released in July 2018.

St. Louis, 26, left Alameda County‘s Santa Rita Jail in Dublin, a suburb east of the San Francisco Bay, around 1:30 a.m. without money or her cellphone. She had served 11 days for a probation violation, according to Sheriff’s Sgt. Ray Kelly. Her body was discovered the next morning at the nearest transit station, which would have required a walk through an isolated area. A coroner later determined that St. Louis died of a drug overdose involving fentanyl, though, as with the Richardson case, her family is unsatisfied with the investigation.

A coalition of women, some of whom were previously incarcerated, created and wrote articles for a website about St. Louis’ case and received feedback from others who had been released under similar circumstances.

Click Here: brisbane lions guernsey 2019

“We started to hear from women, ‘Oh, I have been on that walk before,’” said Krea Gomez, a member of the Sister Warriors Freedom Coalition, the group behind the website “We were hearing from men and women about how messed up it is to have to take that 1.9-mile walk from Santa Rita to the BART station … While this death was an isolated incident, the impact from the walk could potentially have dangerous consequences for many people.”

The group invited Skinner to join them for a nighttime march from the jail to the transit station. The walk was “basically on remote and deserted streets,” Skinner said.

“It was chilling to me,” she said. “I just thought, no, this is not right.”

SB 42 would have applied to anyone released from jail but was written with women and the transgender community in mind, Gomez said. Skinner said that because county jails are often in outlying areas, women can be especially at risk from sex traffickers and others who target them after their release.

“There are predatory individuals who hang out in remote areas at night near jails,” Skinner said. “It doesn‘t take much imagination that anybody hanging out near a jail in a remote location in the middle of the night does not have good intentions.”

Assemblywoman Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-Los Angeles), a co-author of the bill, said Richardson came to mind when she signed on to support the measure. “I also thought of the many instances in Los Angeles where inmates are released and unceremoniously discarded onto our streets,” she said prior to Newsom’s veto. “Our indifference towards the incarcerated and formerly incarcerated costs us too much. Humanity is not that costly of an investment.”

The Richardson case has never been closed.

Late-night releases can also present a danger to communities. On New Year’s Eve 2014, Gary Lee Bullock was released from jail late at night in the Humboldt County city of Eureka, about 60 miles from where he had been arrested, with no transportation readily available.

Bullock wandered to a nearby church where, in the early morning hours, he killed a Catholic priest and took his car, according to media reports. Bullock was convicted on charges including first-degree murder and torture, and sentenced to two life terms. A Humboldt County grand jury found it was one of three deaths within a one-year period in the county that involved people who were released from jail in the late night or early morning hours.

The issue of late-night jail releases has also gained national attention in recent years. Philadelphia city jails have drawn scrutiny after a media investigation found prisoners were released late at night, often without their personal possessions. A jail in Maine also changed its policies last month to end the practice.

Skinner’s bill was approved by the Legislature despite opposition from the California State Sheriffs’ Assn., which voiced concerns similar to those in Newsom’s veto message.

“While county jails are responsible for the care of inmates while in physical custody, the reach and responsibility of public entities can only extend so far,” the association wrote in a letter opposing the bill. “Such a mandate creates space and cost challenges.”

Amika Mota, policy director for the Sister Warriors Freedom Coalition, said her group was disappointed by Newsom’s veto but added the governor’s staff promised to meet with the activists in the coming days.

Skinner said she was unsure if she will bring the legislation back next year. She pointed out that counties are currently free to address the problem themselves, without a new state law, and said she hopes more local sheriffs will do so.

“The sheriffs have the power to do the right thing,” Skinner said.


WASHINGTON — 

Give Richard M. Nixon credit: When he set out to sabotage his opponents in a U.S. presidential campaign, at least he hired Americans for the job.

President Trump outsourced his dirty tricks overseas, asking Ukraine to help destroy former Vice President Joe Biden.

It has landed Trump in a Watergate-size world of trouble.

The 37th president’s path to his ignoble resignation may be the best guide we have to the possible future of the 45th — although that doesn’t mean the two scandals will end the same way.

Still, the similarities are undeniable. In both cases, a president was accused of abusing his power in an attempt to hobble one of his Democratic opponents. The initial allegations led to others, including charges of illegal campaign contributions to the president’s reelection efforts.

On Thursday, 17 federal prosecutors from the Watergate case published an open letter charging that Trump is guilty of the same offenses that brought Nixon down: abuse of power, obstruction of justice and contempt of Congress.

“The same three articles of impeachment could be specified against Trump, as he has demonstrated serious and persistent abuses of power that in our view satisfy the constitutional standard of high crimes and misdemeanors,” they wrote in the Washington Post.

Nixon tried to tamper with the 1972 election when he was seeking a second term. First he sent undercover agents to sabotage the campaign of Sen. Edmund S. Muskie of Maine, the Democrats’ early front-runner.

Then Nixon’s ham-fisted “plumbers” broke into a Democratic Party office in Washington’s Watergate complex to plant listening devices, only to be thwarted by a security guard. A two-year-long whodunit revealed numerous other crimes. Nixon quit after Senate Republicans warned him he’d be ousted from office in an impeachment trial.

Senate Republicans still support Trump — but his Ukraine imbroglio has moved at warp speed compared to Watergate. The House’s impeachment inquiry only began on Sept. 24.

Both presidents tried to shield themselves by holding onto public support — but both lost ground as evidence of their misconduct piled up.

In Nixon’s case, public sentiment changed slowly. Support for his impeachment didn’t reach 50% until June 1974, two years after the Watergate burglary.

Trump’s polls hit that mark less than a month after the White House released a rough transcript of a call that showed Trump had pressed Ukraine’s president for a “favor,” an investigation of his political enemies. Last week, a Fox News Poll found that 51% of the public already favors Trump’s removal from office.

Much of that sentiment is partisan. Some 85% of Democrats favored removing Trump from the White House, according to the poll, while 82% of Republicans said he shouldn’t be impeached at all.

But the president’s GOP base may not be as solid as it looks. A Washington Post-Schar School Poll found that 28% of Republicans support House Democrats’ decision to open an impeachment inquiry, and almost one in five Republicans said they favor removing Trump from office.

If those numbers grow, the president is in serious trouble.

What changed public opinion in Watergate was a slow parade of horrors: revelations of presidential misconduct, more tales of political sabotage, illegal campaign cash, witness tampering and presidential denials that turned out to be false.

A similar pattern is beginning to appear in the Trump White House.

Two associates of the president’s lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, were arrested last week on charges of funneling illegal foreign contributions into a pro-Trump Super PAC. And Trump’s record of denying almost every charge against him, only to admit some of them later, is lavish.

Both presidents tried to block investigations by refusing to give Congress documents and testimony. In both cases, cracks in the wall quickly appeared. Despite a White House decree that no Trump administration officials will cooperate with the impeachment inquiry, several current or former officials have testified behind closed doors, with more to come.

There are obvious differences between the two cases — and they may be as important as the similarities.

The two political parties are far more polarized and disciplined now than in Nixon’s day. In 1974, moderate Republicans and conservative Democrats formed what they called a “fragile coalition” to support Nixon’s impeachment, which gave the House effort a bipartisan sheen. One of the leaders was Rep. William S. Cohen (R-Maine), who later served as secretary of Defense under President Clinton.

No such bipartisan coalition exists today, because almost no moderate Republicans or conservative Democrats are left. Impeaching Trump is a partisan cause so far.

In that respect, it resembles the House Republicans’ impeachment of Clinton in 1998, which led to a trial in the Senate and the acquittal of the president. The impeachment effort never attracted Democratic support.

Watergate teaches one more lesson: Impeachments are unpredictable.

Nixon was determined to defy his enemies, but his own words proved his undoing. Secretly recorded Oval Office tapes showed he had personally directed a coverup; once members of Congress saw the transcripts, he was out the door in three days. Trump’s words — and Oval Office transcripts — may come back to haunt him too.


Click Here: geelong cats guernsey 2019

WASHINGTON — 

Congress is returning from a two-week recess on Tuesday, but some lawmakers barely left Washington.

Three House committees investigating impeachment worked through the break, issuing multiple subpoenas and holding depositions with State Department officials relevant to the inquiry . Democrats are investigating President Trump’s dealings with Ukraine and exploring whether he abused his office by seeking dirt from a foreign country on former Vice President Joe Biden, a leading Democratic contender for the 2020 White House nomination and Trump’s political rival.

That work will intensify when Congress gets back. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has said she wants the committees to work “expeditiously” as Democrats gather evidence and prepare to make a final decision on whether to vote to impeach the president.

The impeachment probe was sparked by a whistleblower who revealed that Trump asked Ukraine’s new president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, on a July telephone call to investigate Biden’s family and Ukraine’s role of in the 2016 election that put Trump in office. The calls to investigate Joe Biden and son Hunter have come without evidence of wrongdoing by either Biden, in either country.

Trump has defended his conduct as “perfect” and said he will refuse to comply with the inquiry.

Flurry of subpoenas and depositions

Despite Trump’s assertions that he won’t cooperate, some members of his administration are participating anyway.

Staff and lawmakers from the House Intelligence Committee, the House Oversight and Reform Committee and the House Foreign Affairs Committee have called in several State Department witnesses.

They have already heard from two: Kurt Volker, a former envoy to Ukraine, and Marie Yovanovitch, a former ambassador to Ukraine. Fiona Hill, a former White House adviser who focused on Russia, is expected to appear in private on Monday, with plans for Gordon Sondland , the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, to follow on Thursday. Sondland didn’t show up for a scheduled deposition last week after the State Department directed him not to come, but his lawyer said he would comply with a subpoena issued by the committees afterward.

Democrats want to ask Sondland about text messages provided by Volker that show the two of them acting as intermediaries as Trump urged Ukraine to start the investigations.

The committees are also seeking closed-door depositions with George Kent, the deputy assistant secretary of state in the European and Eurasian Bureau, and Ulrich Brechbuhl, a State Department counselor.

The panels have subpoenaed or requested documents from the White House, the Defense Department, the White House Office of Management and Budget, Vice President Mike Pence, Energy Secretary Rick Perry, Trump personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani and two Giuliani associates. The deadlines for most of those requests are this coming week.

The whistleblower

The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., suggested Sunday that the committee may not need to hear from the whistleblower after weeks of negotiations to obtain the person’s testimony. The talks have centered on how to protect the whistleblower, who is publicly unknown, and prevent retaliation, given that Trump has said he wants to know the person’s identity. Congressional aides have even suggested somehow disguising the whistleblower so that person’s identity wouldn’t be revealed.

Schiff said “it may not be necessary” to take steps that could risk disclosing the person’s identity to find out more about the July telephone call. The White House released a rough transcript of the call last month.

“Given that we already have the call record, we don’t need the whistleblower, who wasn’t on the call, to tell us what took place during the call,” Schiff said on CBS’ “Face the Nation. “We have the best evidence of that.”

Democrats stick to their strategy

Pelosi has been unflappable while Republicans have criticized her for declining to hold a vote to authorize the impeachment inquiry. The Constitution doesn’t require one, but the House held such votes during the impeachment investigations of Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton.

In a conference call with the Democratic caucus on Friday, the issue didn’t even come up, according to a person familiar with that private call who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss it.

Still, some Democrats have suggested that a vote couldn’t hurt.

“My own opinion is that we ought to just take this off the table because it’s such a nonissue, and there’s no doubt in my mind that of course if Nancy Pelosi does that, she will have the votes and that will pass,” said Democratic Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticut, a member of the intelligence Committee. “But it’s not required,” he said Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.”

Court battles

Democrats had a victory on Friday when a federal appeals court ruled that Trump’s financial records must be turned over to the House.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said lawmakers should get the documents they have subpoenaed from the accounting firm Mazars USA, which has provided services to the president. Trump went to court to prevent Mazars from turning over the material.

The House Oversight and Reform Committee subpoenaed records from Mazars in April. They include documents from 2011 to 2018 that the House wants for investigation into the president’s reporting of his finances and potential conflicts of interest.

The committee chairman, Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., said on the Friday call with Pelosi that Democrats expect the Trump administration will do everything in its power to slow down the legal process. He predicted the case will go to the Supreme Court.

It’s unclear whether Democrats will fight any of their impeachment battles in court. That might not be necessary because witnesses have begun to comply with subpoenas despite Trump’s orders.

Republicans protest

Republicans have little recourse in the impeachment inquiry, but they have focused their ire on Democrats and defended the president. They are expected to step up those efforts in the coming weeks.

Trump and Republicans on the investigating committees have said the White House should have more rights in the inquiry; for example, the ability for his lawyers to be present for interviews and to cross-examine witnesses.

“This process is a joke, and the consequences are huge,” Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y., said Friday.


Click Here: geelong cats guernsey 2019

Paul Stastny scored twice on the power play, Max Pacioretty added a power-play goal and the Vegas Golden Knights beat the Kings 5-2 on Sunday night.

Click Here: geelong cats guernsey 2019

Reilly Smith and Mark Stone also scored, and Marc-Andre Fleury made 36 saves as the Golden Knights swept their first set of back-to-back games.

Vegas was 3 for 3 on the power play after starting the season 3 for 17 with the man-advantage.

Jonathan Quick allowed five goals on 36 shots for the Kings. Quick has allowed 19 goals on 92 shots in his three appearances this season. He has allowed at least five goals in five of his last seven starts.

Stastny redirected Pacioretty’s pass between Quick’s legs to put the Golden Knights up 3-1 at 14:51 of the second period. He made it 4-1 with a one-timer on a feed from Jonathan Marchessault 2:09 later. It was Stastny’s second career game with two power-play goals, and he finished with four points.

Dustin Brown pulled the Kings within 4-2 at 4:24 of the third period, but Stone pushed the lead back to three goals by scoring 17 seconds later.

Vegas went in front 1-0 at 5:42 of the first period on Smith’s fourth goal of the season. Smith scored on a wrist shot from the left circle, with William Karlsson providing his sixth assist through five games.

Pacioretty scored on the power play at 6:59 to make it 2-0, scoring from the right dot after being given too much space by the Kings. But Los Angeles cut the deficit to 2-1 on Austin Wagner’s first goal of the season 50 seconds later.