Category: News

Home / Category: News

Audrey Hepburn wearing a Givenchy spring/summer 1955 cocktail dress, June 1955.

As a model in front of the camera, with her flaming red hair, Grace Coddington is a modern day Elizabeth Siddall. Behind the lens, as an editor, she is responsible for creating some of the most iconic fashion photographs of the past 50 years. And there is one photographer who she has collaborated with on numerous occasions, who she holds in particularly high regard – the late Norman Parkinson (or ‘Parkinson’ as she affectionately calls him). “He taught me everything about being an editor, and really keeping your eyes open all the time,” Coddington tells “To just keep watching. Keep looking. And take in everything so you can feed that back into your work.” 

Coddington’s love of Parkinson’s photographs dates back far beyond their first encounter, to her childhood in North Wales, when she would pore over his magazine shoots. As a new book of his work, is published, Coddington shares six of the standout qualities that made him truly unique.

The Beatles at the President Hotel, Russell Square, London, 1963. 

Norman Parkinson had a hawk-like eye for potential

“Parkinson and I first met in 1959. I was working in a bistro in London at the time and one of the regular customers, Tinker Paterson – a model and artist who was a major part of Parkinson’s life at that time – set up a meeting. I didn’t have a book of photos or anything to show him, but he said he didn’t want to see other people’s photos of me and would rather meet in person. Parkinson was really fantastic at finding new faces – he found them in the street, or wherever – and was able to recognise someone’s potential. Anyway, he booked me for my very first job and it was actually a nude shoot outside on his farm in Oxfordshire. I was so excited to work with him that I didn’t really register I would have to take my clothes off. I continued working with him as a model a little – in 1959 I won the young division of British ’s modelling contest and he was one of four judges – but he found much better models than me. We would go on to work together when I became a fashion editor, and that’s when our understanding of each other’s work really began.”

 Marie-Hélène Arnaud photographed for the cover of British Vogue, August 1957.

And that hawk-like eye travelled

“Parkinson and I travelled the world together. Perhaps one of the most memorable trips was in 1975 to the then USSR with Jerry Hall for a British shoot. We were invited by the tourist board and they had guides accompany us everywhere we went, watching our every move. One of the strict rules they imposed was that we had to have all of the film processed before we left the country. Parkinson stayed on an extra week to process the film and on our last night he said, ‘I’m really worried that they’re going to damage the film, can you take a few rolls back just in case?’ I was like, ‘No, no, no, Big Brother might be watching and I don’t want to end up in jail.’ But then Jerry said, ‘Oh, it’s fine, I’ll take it I never get searched.’’’

“So Jerry and I get to Moscow airport and we’re seized by the authorites who say they’ve received a tip-off that we’re smuggling out anti-communist propaganda in the form of unexposed film. They went through all our bags and of course they found our contraband in Jerry’s bag. It was the type of film that you seal with an ‘exposed’ sticker once it’s been used, but I reminded them it was ‘unexposed’ film they were looking for not ‘exposed’ and therefore they should give it all back to us. The funny part is when we all got back to London and compared the photographs, the ones processed in Russia were a much better quality.”

Montgomery Clift photographed for British Vogue in New York, November 1952.

He was a true original and, for better or worse, ahead of the game

“Quite often these days I will turn up to a job and there will be pictures from shoots I worked on with Parkinson, Guy Bourdin or Helmut Newton on the moodboard, and my response is always: ‘I’m not here to redo what has already been done, we did it pretty well back in the day.’ Because of the pace we are expected to work, and the way we swipe through pictures at high speed, photographers are frequently asked to copy something that already exists because they need a proven image that has already been okayed by the client.

“Parkinson was occasionally inspired by artists but he never copied other people’s pictures, which is why his photographs are eternally modern. He took an almost reportage approach. After he stopped working with Condé Nast he went over to and then I think his pictures became more brash and maybe a little tacky. But that’s exactly what happened in the world; it’s all about the Kardashians now, so he was ahead of his time in a way because he loved photographing the lives of the rich and famous. A good picture is a good picture, you can’t take that away – it will stand the test of time.”

He had the luxury of time

“Back then shoots abroad would always last at least two weeks – we really had the luxury of time; we’d spend at least a week on the ground scouting for locations – which meant you really got to see and understand a place. Like finding new faces, Parkinson was amazing at finding narratives in places and could conjure powerful images from almost any given surrounding. He wasn’t thinking about something else or the next job, he was always in the moment, completely focussed.

“Nowadays you learn what you can from a guidebook beforehand or from location shots but everyone gets the same thing – everything is done in such a hurry; shoots are crammed into a day and the photographer is expected to produce hundreds of shots – you never get in your own personal view. Parkinson made every place so personal because he looked at it through his eyes, not anyone else’s. That’s the biggest lesson he taught me: not to rely on other people’s opinions but to forge your own, really explore and look. It’s certainly done well for me.”

The official portrait of Prince Charles, marking his investiture as Prince of Wales, Caernarfon Castle, Wales, July 1969.

He was a consistent collaborator

“Parkinson always worked with a small team – aside from himself there would be one assistant, a fashion editor and a model on set and his wife Wenda would always come too and write the travel piece that accompanied the photoshoot. He created these pictures that we’re still looking at today and loving for their looseness and movement – they’re never stationary. The model isn’t necessarily rolling around with laughter, but there is always a lot of joy, and that’s down to the fact he was a funny man, charming, and he made them feel comfortable and in many cases made their careers; Celia Hammond for example.”

Pilar Crespi photographed for Town & Country at Trincomalee beach, Sri Lanka, March 1980. 

He knew how to make people, his subjects, feel comfortable

“Parkinson was really good with people, whether they be movie stars, fashion models, royalty or whatever. I was with him when he photographed Prince Charles for his investiture as the Prince of Wales. Parkinson asked me to come along because, he said: ‘I know he’s going to turn up after playing polo or something and he’ll be red in the face and I don’t know how to deal with that.’ I wasn’t a makeup artist or anything, but I brought along some powder and we spent the day at Windsor Castle. It was a very funny moment – at one point suddenly all these Corgis appeared out of nowhere, apparently the Queen was having tea on the other side of the hedge from where we were shooting, and another time the Princess of Wales galloped by on a horse – but it was quite a moment for me to be that close to the future king of England and be powdering is nose.”

, is out now.

Click Here: online rugby store malaysia

Share

24th Jul 2019

When Tori Spelling who played Donna on iconic ‘90s teen soap Beverly Hills, 90210 accidentally let slip to Access Live earlier this month that a reboot of the popular show was “confirmed”, die-hard 90210 fans went into excitement overload. 

Because, while the hit show—which ran for 10 season from 1990 to 2000—did have a second life from 2008 until 2013 in the form of a show called 90210, it didn’t capture fans’ hearts and minds in the same compelling way the original show did. Also, a 90210 reboot really needed to have the original crew back in their famous neighbourhood so fans could see what’s next for Donna, David, Kelly, Steve, Brandon and the rest of the OG 90210 crew.

Fast forward to 2019 and we will get to see what life looks like decades later for our favourite crew from the world’s most famous postcode. Are Kelly and Brandon together? What’s new for Steve? Is David still DJing? What happened to the Peach Pit? Will Shannen Doherty, who played Brandon’s twin Brenda and famously got fired from the show, return? We need answers to these burning questions.

Here, we’ve pulled together everything we know so far about the Beverly Hills, 90210 reboot.

Is the Beverly Hills, 90210 reboot definitely happening?
Yes. Aside from Tori Spelling’s accidental confirmation to Access Live, The Hollywood Reporter (THR) also confirmed the news, reporting the Fox network has “handed out a straight-to-series order for 90210”.

Who’s confirmed for the cast?
Initially, six original cast members were confirmed for the reboot per THR including: Jason Priestley (Brandon Walsh), Jennie Garth (Kelly Taylor), Ian Ziering (Steve Sanders), Gabrielle Carteris (Andrea Zuckerman), Brian Austin Green (David Silver) and Tori Spelling (Donna Martin). While we were unsure whether Shannen Doherty, who played Brenda Walsh, Brandon’s twin sister, would be returning to the set of the reboot after she was famously fired from the original show, the actress confirmed via Instagram that thankfully, she will be–and in more ways than just one.

Per Teen Vogue, Doherty is also set to executive produce the series. Heartbreakingly, there is no doubt we’re all going to miss 90210’s resident bad boy Dylan McKay, following Luke Perry’s passing in March 2019. While the actor was yet to sign onto the project before his death, Teen Vogue is reporting that in one way or another, the reboot is expected to pay tribute to Perry. 

What is the premise of the reboot?
Per The Hollywood Reporter the 90210 reboot will be a “twist” on the original show that will run for six-episodes as a “limited series”. The reboot was reportedly “inspired by the six original stars’ real lives and relationships.”

Click Here: toulon rugby shop melbourne

The official description per THR is as follows: “Having gone their separate ways since the original series ended 19 years ago, Jason [Priestly], Jennie [Garth], Ian [Ziering], Gabrielle [Carteris], Brian [Austin Green] and Tori [Spelling] reunite when one of them suggest it’s time to get a Beverly Hills, 90210 reboot up and running. But getting it going may make for an even more delicious soap than the reboot itself. What will happen when first loves, old romances, friends and frenemies come back together, as this iconic cast… attempts to continue from where they left off?”

The stars took to their socials to share the news, posting a short teaser video about the reboot. Garth captioned her post with: ‘We’re coming home!”

A number of cast members have since taken to social media to share images from behind the scenes of the reboot’s production. Gabrielle Carteris, who plays Andrea Zuckerman on the hit series has posted countless photos to her profile, depicting everything from the new Peach Pit, to cast table reads. 

When will it be on TV?
Fox has finally released the official premier date for the Beverly Hills, 90210 reboot, which has been given the abbreviated title BH90210. As it’s set to air as soon as August 7, prepare to welcome the likes of Kelly and Brandon back to your screens in next to no time. The show’s first official trailer has also been revealed, so be sure to watch on as the cast reunite in the 30 second preview, below. 

Everything you need to know about Anwar Hadid

July 24, 2019 | News | No Comments

While the fashion world falls hard for new couple Dua Lipa and Anwar Hadid, here’s everything you need to know about the rising American star that’s dating the UK’s queen of pop.

Who is Anwar Hadid?

At 20 years old, Anwar is the youngest member of the Hadid clan. An LA native (the Palestinian-Dutch siblings were raised in Malibu), Anwar has followed in the footsteps of older sisters Gigi and Bella Hadid, relocating to New York and earning fashion industry success in his own right. Modelling is only part of the story, however. Anwar Hadid is also pursuing a career in music and released his debut album, , in April, which includes a collaboration with long-time friend, Jaden Smith. Musical talents (as well as photogenic looks) run in the family: Hadid’s stepfather is Grammy Award-winning Canadian music producer David Foster, the man behind hit tracks by the likes of Alice Cooper, Celine Dion and Jennifer Lopez. 

Anwar Hadid’s relationship CV:

Anwar Hadid was linked to actress Nicola Peltz, before he became the not-so-mysterious guy who Kendall Jenner was spotted kissing at the CFDA Awards afterparty in 2018. The ‘are they/aren’t they’ rumours took a while to die out – in the autumn of the same year, it was reported that  Jenner and Hadid were sporting matching love bites during Milan Fashion Week.

Fast forward to June 2019 and all eyes are on Hadid’s burgeoning relationship with 23-year-old British pop star, Dua Lipa. If – as (yet more) rumours have it – Gigi played matchmaker between her musical pal and younger brother, the setup has paid off. The duo (nicknamed “Duwar” by fans) have proved inseparable during the past few weeks, making ultra laid-back, loved-up public appearances at the British Summer Time music festival in London’s Hyde Park (where she wore his Toronto Blue Jays cardigan), and after her Amazon Prime Day concert in New York (both wearing coordinated baggy pants). With a work schedule that sees the two swap cities almost every day, the new couple were more recently pictured hand-in-hand in Hollywood, reportedly following a sushi dinner date.

Anwar Hadid’s fashion CV:

Anwar Hadid made his first ever runway appearance for Moschino in June 2016, alongside sisters Bella and Gigi, at the age of just 16. He has since gone on to walk for Ralph Lauren, Tommy Hilfiger and Rihanna’s Fenty x Puma line. Off the runway, he’s fronted campaigns for Hugo Boss and Valentino – he’s currently the face of the latter’s latest fragrance launch, Born in Roma, alongside supermodel Adut Akech, set in the regal surrounds of the 17th-century Villa Aldobrandini overlooking the Italian capital.

Anwar Hadid’s signature look:

From bleaching his own hair, to a well-documented penchant for tattoos and baggy skate pants, Anwar Hadid channels an off-beat grungier take on Californian style. “I have so many weird tattoos that at one point meant something to me, but no longer do,” Hadid recently told . One inking that has retained its meaning? The phrase “‘Same but different’ – because I have friends that are Muslim, Christian, Jewish, black, Asian, Arab, white. Everything. We’re all brothers or sisters at the end of the day.”

Click Here: cheap kanken backpack

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

There are some common questions that keep us up at night, whirring in the backs of our heads. One of them, fashion fans will note, sounds a lot like ‘Do I really need this handbag?’ The phrasing may differ slightly but the nature of the inquiry remains the same—and lurks in our minds for days, weeks (months, even!) begging us to reach a resolve.

Iconic handbags like the Chanel 2.55, the Dior Saddle Bag (John Galliano’s original or Maria Grazia Chiuri’s revised version) and the Celine Trapeze Bag spring to mind. As does Proenza Schouler’s PS11, Balenciaga’s Motorcycle Bag and Chloé’s Paddington Bag, each of which helped to cultivate cult audiences around these then-fledgling brands.

To know these pieces is to want them. But, while admiring such things of beauty from afar is easy enough, making a financial commitment can be far harder.

So what if our horoscopes could dictate the choice of our handbags? Zodiac signs have long been used to help determine the fate of our friendships, our futures, and even our finances. It only makes sense that our styles, too, are sealed in the stars.

Buying a bag is a big investment: it should fit all that you need, it should weather rain, hail or shine and, if chosen wisely, it should turn heads too. Before you bite the bullet, consider these horoscopic readings below to find out which bag is right for your birth month.  

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Capricorn

22 December – 20 January

Tradition, craftsmanship and discipline are the bread and butter for those born in this month. Novelty bags (fanny packs, micro bags, box bags made of translucent beads) just wont do for this earth sign that is ruled by the planet Saturn. A classic silhouette will be most compelling—think a Chanel WOC (a wallet on chain) or a Prada leather tote for everlasting appeal. For a more affordable option, consider Mansur Gavriel’s bucket bag or a satin wristlet by The Row.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Aquarius

Click Here: cheap kanken backpack

21 January – 18 February

Intelligent, independent and inventive are key identifiers when it comes to spotting an Aquarius-born bag lover. Those born in this month won’t just sling any bag across their bodies—an accessory of their choosing should inspire instant conversation. Smaller up-and-coming brands are a great go-to (think Wandler or Byredo), with the colour and texture of your chosen companion equally important considerations to keep front of mind.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Pisces

19 February – 20 March

Imagination, musicality and romance make up the vocabulary of the Pisces-born. A water sign ruled by the planets Jupiter and Neptune, bag wearers born in this month will gravitate naturally towards bags with less boxy, restrictive styles. Think buttery leather, fringe tassels and soft, pastel colours. A Valentino bag or Issey Miyake Bao Bao will meld imagination and romance with ease, and will make your heart sing, too.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Aries

21 March – 19 April

Confidence, courage and versatility make up the personalities of the Aries-born, a fire sign ruled by the planet Mars. Theirs is a bag that should do all of the work, and all of the talking. A Loewe Puzzle bag will tick the box with its diverse ways of wearing, while a hand-held accessory by Staud will show off your fashion risk-taking and bold style in spades.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Taurus

20 April – 20 May

Taurus-born bag lovers are believed to possess qualities of reliability, responsibility and being grounded. In bag speak, these translate to non-precious, sturdy and sustainable bags you can throw anything into, and then throw over your shoulder and go. Enter Saint Laurent’s universal pleaser, the Sac du jour, or A.P.C’s beloved half moon cross body bag. This truth is undisputed: in matters of the sac, the French do it best.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Gemini

21 May – 21 June

Adaptable yet restless, quick-witted yet inconsistent at times, myth has it since the dawn of time that Geminis have split personalities. Air signs ruled by the planet Mercury, Geminis should opt for bags that transcend time and season and will keep them interested with their everlasting appeal. The best alternatives? A cross body by Jérôme Dreyfuss or the timeless Pandora bag courtesy of Givenchy.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Cancer

22 June – 22 July

Creativity, spontaneity, loyalty and emotion are synonymous with Cancers, a water sign ruled by the Moon. When it comes to accessorising, bag wearers born in this month don’t overthink their styling and are always happy to try new things or conversely, wear the same beloved bag for years. Younger brands especially appeal—think Hunting Season or By Far—and consider buying these in special edition colourways, sumptuous velvet or exotic leathers.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Leo

23 July – 22 August

Cheerful! Humorous! Energetic! Leos, a fire sign ruled by the sun, are always up for fun, and like their accessories to reflect that. Don’t look past the trends of the season or the odd shaped propositions young designers are beckoning you to try. Cult Gaia, Gucci and Acne Studios spring to mind immediately, as do Miu Miu, Jacquemus and Paco Rabanne. Which will you choose?

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Virgo

23 August – 22 September

Conscientious, meticulous and ever practical, Virgos are earth signs ruled by Mercury. Fashion fans born in this month wont lust after delicate minaudiéres or heavy carryalls. Instead, a well made cross body bag that exhibits beautiful construction and allows for hands-free wear is the optimal contender. An Hermès Constance or Evelyne are the pinnacle, of course, but try on Gabriela Hearst’s Nina bag or Loewe’s Gate bag for size.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Libra

23 September – 23 October

Romance, charm and harmony underwrite the Libra-born, an air sign ruled by the planet Venus. Abandon oversized tote bags and focus your energies (financial and fashionable) on the top handle handbag or the evening clutch. For charm? Look to Miu Miu. For romance? Look to Dior. And for harmony? Well, you could always buy both…

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Scorpio

24 October – 22 November

Passion, bravery and companionship spring to mind at the mention of a Scorpio. A water sign ruled by the planets Mars and Pluto, those born in this month likely enjoy taking fashion risks—their bags (bold as they may be) are ride or die. A piece by Virgil Abloh or a Balenciaga fanny pack would be the perfect example. Alternatively, the JW Anderson Pierce bag is another daring-yet-obvious choice.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Sagittarius

23 November – 21 December

A love of travel, a knack for adventure and an inclination for humour epitomise the well-rounded character of a Sagittarius. A fire sign ruled by the planet Jupiter, bag lovers born in this month are hungry to see all that the world has to offer—by way of physical travel or a transformative accessory from the heart of Paris, London or Milan. The tongue-in-cheek bags of Jeremy Scott for Moschino will make lighthearted, conversational companions, whereas a Louis Vuitton keepall will fit everything you need while on the go. A fuschia Chanel carryon, on the other hand, will do both.

What to Expect from the Mueller Hearings

July 24, 2019 | News | No Comments

The biggest surprise of Robert Mueller’s testimony on Capitol Hill on Wednesday will be if it contains any surprises at all. The former special counsel will appear before the House Judiciary Committee for three hours in the morning and then move over to the House Intelligence Committee. In all, sixty-three lawmakers will have the opportunity to question him, and there’s no telling what some of them may ask. But we already have a good idea of what Mueller is going to say, because he has told us.

“There has been discussion about an appearance before Congress,” Mueller said, on May 29th, when he appeared at the Justice Department and read a prepared statement. “Any testimony from this office would not go beyond our report. It contains our findings and analysis and the reasons for the decisions we made. We chose those words carefully, and the work speaks for itself. And the report is my testimony. I would not provide information beyond that which is already public in any appearance before Congress.”

Mueller, who has now retired as special counsel, only agreed to testify after he was issued a subpoena. On Monday, Mueller reiterated through a spokesman his intention to stay within the bounds of his report. According to NBC News, the spokesman also said that Mueller will ask to submit the report, which stretches to four hundred and forty-eight pages, as his official statement for the record.

All this doesn’t necessarily mean that the hearings will be duds. As I noted back in April, when the Justice Department released a redacted version of the report, Volume 2 of the Mueller report contained “voluminous evidence that the President repeatedly tried to hamper, and even close down, the Russia investigation,” including ordering Don McGahn, who was then the White House counsel, to fire Mueller, and subsequently asking McGahn to falsify the record to make it look like he never issued such an order. And while Mueller concluded in Volume 1 of the report that he didn’t find enough evidence to charge anybody connected to the Trump campaign with conspiring with Russia to influence the 2016 election, that volume also contained a great deal of damaging material. For instance, it detailed how Michael Cohen and other members of the Trump Organization pursued plans to build a Trump Tower in Moscow deep into the election campaign, briefing Trump on numerous occasions about their progress. All this while Trump was maintaining—at the time and ever since—that he had no business with Russia.

In forcing Mueller to testify, the Democrats’ goal was to focus public attention on these findings and others, which Attorney General, William Barr, overshadowed in his selective and misleading representation of the report’s contents. “We want Robert Mueller to bring it to life,” Adam Schiff, the head of the Intelligence Committee, said, on CBS News’s “Face the Nation.” To this end, Democrats will ask Mueller to read out key parts of the report and characterize them. Citing a hypothetical example, Jerry Nadler, the head of the Judiciary Committee, told Fox News’s Chris Wallace, “Look at page 344, paragraph two, please read it. Does that describe obstruction of justice, and did you find that the President did that?”

While some of the report is written in the dry language of legal briefs, there are a number of passages that would seem to lend themselves to being recited on television. Take this one, from page seventy-eight of the report’s second volume:

Or this passage, from page hundred and seventeen of Volume 2:

In our televisual culture, where a single exchange in a Presidential debate can change a candidate’s prospects overnight, it is hard to predict what the impact will be of having a stiff-backed pillar of rectitude like Mueller reading out passages like these. And, even allowing for the former special counsel’s apparent determination to avoid straying beyond the language contained in the report, there is always the possibility of some unscripted drama, especially if, as expected during the six hours of testimony, the Republican members of the committees press Mueller about the origins of his investigation.

But what we won’t get from Mueller, it is safe to assume, is a straightforward answer to the fundamental question he dodged in his report: Did the President’s behavior detailed in Volume 2 satisfy a prosecutor’s definition of obstruction?

In his report, you will recall, Mueller said that he decided not to reach a prosecutorial judgement, and he pointed to a 2000 memorandum from the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Opinion that criminal charges cannot be brought against a sitting President. The report also said “a federal criminal accusation against a sitting President would . . . potentially preempt constitutional processes for addressing presidential misconduct”—an apparent reference to impeachment. Unfortunately, however, Mueller’s argument was shrouded in legalese. This allowed elected Republicans and Fox News hosts to ignore it and parrot Trump’s propaganda line: “No collusion, no obstruction.” Judging by the lack of support for impeachment, this strategy of obfuscation has worked. According to the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll, just twenty-one per cent of Americans support starting impeachment hearings now.

In this, ostensibly his last public act, Mueller could theoretically cast aside his constricted view of a special counsel’s role and state the truth of the matter in plain English. At considerable cost to the taxpayer, his team uncovered a good deal of prima-facie evidence of criminality, and it is the constitutional duty of Congress to pursue the matter, because nobody, not even the President, is above the law. Mueller could say something like this. Given the menacing threat that Trump represents, he should say it. But will he? Don’t hold your breath.

Click Here: cheap kanken backpack

It’s a shame that HBO dropped boxing last year, because Sunday’s finale of the second season of “Big Little Lies” should have aired as a pay-per-view event. A pair of legendary fighters entered the ring, a suffocating family courtroom where the matter of the guardianship of traumatized twin brothers would be decided by a sympathetic but inscrutable judge. In suits and ties, the boys are handsome carbon copies of the season’s recurring ghost, their father, Perry (Alexander Skarsgård), the abuser and rapist who died at the end of Season 1. The weaponry of choice for their mother, Celeste (Nicole Kidman), is a severe suit in lifeless blue and a line of lawyerly, hideous questioning. Her adversary, sitting before her on the witness stand, is Mary Louise, the mother of Perry, who is played by Meryl Streep with a set of fake teeth and a bad case of maternal denial.

Our eyes darted from Kidman to Streep, from Kidman to Streep, in the climactic scene, like they do when we watch champion athletes. Celeste, acting as her own lawyer, was the stoic, bringing Mary Louise to heel by invoking Perry’s brother, Raymond, who died in a car accident after Mary Louise lost her temper; according to Perry, Celeste says, Mary Louise blamed him for his brother’s death, emotionally and physically abusing him. Mary Louise, the witchy hysteric, dissolves, but recovers herself enough to counter with her slut-shaming theories of Celeste’s shortcomings as a mother. Then Celeste plays for the courtroom a secret video, recorded by the twins, of Perry savagely beating her. The people in the courtroom grimace; Celeste wins full custody. Intensely choreographed, reminiscent of the interrogation operatics in “The People v. O. J. Simpson,” the scene guarantees the actors their Emmy nominations. On Twitter on Sunday night, I saw a video showing Kidman on the courtroom set bowing to Streep.

Click Here: kanken mini cheap

This ended up being the whole point of the seven episodes of Season 2, didn’t it? Flashy glorification of the “Big Little Lies” phenomenon. The electricity of the performances from Kidman, Streep, and Laura Dern (as Renata, the power broker reduced to forsaken wife) pumped into existence a thousand memes and a million GIFs, but the currents were not strong enough to distract us from the weak plot of this encore season, which probably should not have been made, or, rather, recycled from the first.

The initial episodes I watched for review, in June, were promising. The Season 1 murder mystery had been solved in a perfect finale, but I thought the writers were right to dwell on Celeste’s complicated grief, the threatened marriage of Madeline (Reese Witherspoon) and Ed (Adam Scott), and, most importantly, the backstory of Bonnie, (Zoë Kravitz), who pushed Perry to his death and is disintegrating under the weight of the guilt. Quickly, and disappointingly, the scripts thinned, looping back to the same arguments and the same tearful monologues, so much so that the episodes started to give me déjà vu. Forward momentum and psychological surprise were forfeited for Emmy-baiting speeches. How many times would Ed, and Nathan, the ex-husband of Madeline and current husband to Bonnie, sneer at each other on their running path, like yipping puppies? How many times would Renata wail about her stolen wealth? To be clear, I loved the rage of Renata, who, in the finale, like Pipilotti Rist by way of Beyoncé, smashes her husband’s train set with a baseball bat. But I loved it discretely, as it was basically unlinked to the central matters of the plot.

Do the showrunners of “Big Little Lies” know that their soap opera is about whiteness and the toxic effects of keeping up appearances and suffocating the truth? Story-wise, the biggest injustice in Season 2 was done to Bonnie. In the Liane Moriarty novel upon which the series is based, the Bonnie character is almost peripheral, and she’s white, like the other members of the clique. In Season 1, it seemed that the casting of Kravitz in the role was color-blind, not meant to rouse any comment on the monoracial culture around her.

Season 2 nudges Bonnie toward depth but is not capable of explaining what it is on the edge of its tongue: why this young black woman lives in this town. What she thinks of the nouveau riche around her, how she plans to secure the survival of herself and her daughter. She is not truly friends with the others. She does not love her husband, she confesses in the finale. Throughout the second season, we learn that Bonnie is a victim of cruel mothering; when her mother, Elizabeth (Crystal Fox), comes to town, Bonnie is beset by flashbacks of abuse. Her dark-skinned mother, queasily, is revealed to be a mystic; when she shakes the hand of Renata at a disco-themed party, Elizabeth seizes, collapsing on the floor from a stroke. For most of the season, Bonnie is alone, sitting by her mother’s hospital bedside, fantasizing about smothering her mother with a pillow, asking for forgiveness. When she pushed Perry, she was actually pushing her mother, she says. It is so rich, the implications of Bonnie’s life—the passive white father, the besieged black mother, her blank marriage, her woo-woo childhood—but the show doesn’t allow any of these details to penetrate the sanctum of the group.

IndieWire reported, recently, on the creative controversies that plagued the set of Season 2. Andrea Arnold was brought on to direct, but some of her scenes were allegedly reshot or recut by Jean-Marc Vallée, the show’s co-producer and Season 1 director, to unify the styles of the first and second seasons. “Sources describe dailies filled with Arnold’s trademark restless camera searching for grace notes—those gestures, movements, and poetic frames of natural light that added another layer to what is not being said,” according to IndieWire. The rest of us couldn’t see Arnold’s raw footage, but we could detect a palpable sense of interference. The transitions between scenes were jagged, and information shockingly apportioned. The motif of the flashback began to lose its power as a summoner of memory, becoming more like a technical crutch. In the sixth episode, through the private investigations of Mary Louise, we learned that Celeste had been having anonymous sex with men she met at bars. This is a profound bit of character detail, but it arrived so late in the season, and so disconnected from Celeste’s perspective, that it served only as a lurid “gotcha” revelation.

“I’ve been thinking a lot about something you said a while back, about the lie, and that it had a shelf life,” Madeline says to Celeste, during the finale. The same could be said of the series. With its murderer’s row of actors, “Big Little Lies” could plausibly pull us in for many more seasons, but should it? The finale seemed to be weighing this question. Nervously hopeful for a new beginning, Madeline and Ed renew their vows, and Jane (Shailene Woodley) has the first consensual sex of her life, with her sweet co-worker Corey. One way to view the last minutes of the finale is not as a cliffhanger but as an ending. Bonnie, who through her mother’s death has experienced catharsis, texts Madeline, Renata, Jane, and Celeste to meet her at the police station. Wordlessly, they file in; their ordeal has dragged on for far too long.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

There are some common questions that keep us up at night, whirring in the backs of our heads. One of them, fashion fans will note, sounds a lot like ‘Do I really need this handbag?’ The phrasing may differ slightly but the nature of the inquiry remains the same—and lurks in our minds for days, weeks (months, even!) begging us to reach a resolve.

Iconic handbags like the Chanel 2.55, the Dior Saddle Bag (John Galliano’s original or Maria Grazia Chiuri’s revised version) and the Celine Trapeze Bag spring to mind. As does Proenza Schouler’s PS11, Balenciaga’s Motorcycle Bag and Chloé’s Paddington Bag, each of which helped to cultivate cult audiences around these then-fledgling brands.

To know these pieces is to want them. But, while admiring such things of beauty from afar is easy enough, making a financial commitment can be far harder.

So what if our horoscopes could dictate the choice of our handbags? Zodiac signs have long been used to help determine the fate of our friendships, our futures, and even our finances. It only makes sense that our styles, too, are sealed in the stars.

Buying a bag is a big investment: it should fit all that you need, it should weather rain, hail or shine and, if chosen wisely, it should turn heads too. Before you bite the bullet, consider these horoscopic readings below to find out which bag is right for your birth month.  

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Capricorn

22 December – 20 January

Tradition, craftsmanship and discipline are the bread and butter for those born in this month. Novelty bags (fanny packs, micro bags, box bags made of translucent beads) just wont do for this earth sign that is ruled by the planet Saturn. A classic silhouette will be most compelling—think a Chanel WOC (a wallet on chain) or a Prada leather tote for everlasting appeal. For a more affordable option, consider Mansur Gavriel’s bucket bag or a satin wristlet by The Row.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Aquarius

21 January – 18 February

Intelligent, independent and inventive are key identifiers when it comes to spotting an Aquarius-born bag lover. Those born in this month won’t just sling any bag across their bodies—an accessory of their choosing should inspire instant conversation. Smaller up-and-coming brands are a great go-to (think Wandler or Byredo), with the colour and texture of your chosen companion equally important considerations to keep front of mind.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Pisces

19 February – 20 March

Imagination, musicality and romance make up the vocabulary of the Pisces-born. A water sign ruled by the planets Jupiter and Neptune, bag wearers born in this month will gravitate naturally towards bags with less boxy, restrictive styles. Think buttery leather, fringe tassels and soft, pastel colours. A Valentino bag or Issey Miyake Bao Bao will meld imagination and romance with ease, and will make your heart sing, too.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Aries

21 March – 19 April

Confidence, courage and versatility make up the personalities of the Aries-born, a fire sign ruled by the planet Mars. Theirs is a bag that should do all of the work, and all of the talking. A Loewe Puzzle bag will tick the box with its diverse ways of wearing, while a hand-held accessory by Staud will show off your fashion risk-taking and bold style in spades.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Taurus

20 April – 20 May

Taurus-born bag lovers are believed to possess qualities of reliability, responsibility and being grounded. In bag speak, these translate to non-precious, sturdy and sustainable bags you can throw anything into, and then throw over your shoulder and go. Enter Saint Laurent’s universal pleaser, the Sac du jour, or A.P.C’s beloved half moon cross body bag. This truth is undisputed: in matters of the sac, the French do it best.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Gemini

21 May – 21 June

Adaptable yet restless, quick-witted yet inconsistent at times, myth has it since the dawn of time that Geminis have split personalities. Air signs ruled by the planet Mercury, Geminis should opt for bags that transcend time and season and will keep them interested with their everlasting appeal. The best alternatives? A cross body by Jérôme Dreyfuss or the timeless Pandora bag courtesy of Givenchy.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Cancer

22 June – 22 July

Creativity, spontaneity, loyalty and emotion are synonymous with Cancers, a water sign ruled by the Moon. When it comes to accessorising, bag wearers born in this month don’t overthink their styling and are always happy to try new things or conversely, wear the same beloved bag for years. Younger brands especially appeal—think Hunting Season or By Far—and consider buying these in special edition colourways, sumptuous velvet or exotic leathers.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Leo

23 July – 22 August

Cheerful! Humorous! Energetic! Leos, a fire sign ruled by the sun, are always up for fun, and like their accessories to reflect that. Don’t look past the trends of the season or the odd shaped propositions young designers are beckoning you to try. Cult Gaia, Gucci and Acne Studios spring to mind immediately, as do Miu Miu, Jacquemus and Paco Rabanne. Which will you choose?

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Virgo

23 August – 22 September

Conscientious, meticulous and ever practical, Virgos are earth signs ruled by Mercury. Fashion fans born in this month wont lust after delicate minaudiéres or heavy carryalls. Instead, a well made cross body bag that exhibits beautiful construction and allows for hands-free wear is the optimal contender. An Hermès Constance or Evelyne are the pinnacle, of course, but try on Gabriela Hearst’s Nina bag or Loewe’s Gate bag for size.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Libra

23 September – 23 October

Romance, charm and harmony underwrite the Libra-born, an air sign ruled by the planet Venus. Abandon oversized tote bags and focus your energies (financial and fashionable) on the top handle handbag or the evening clutch. For charm? Look to Miu Miu. For romance? Look to Dior. And for harmony? Well, you could always buy both…

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Scorpio

24 October – 22 November

Passion, bravery and companionship spring to mind at the mention of a Scorpio. A water sign ruled by the planets Mars and Pluto, those born in this month likely enjoy taking fashion risks—their bags (bold as they may be) are ride or die. A piece by Virgil Abloh or a Balenciaga fanny pack would be the perfect example. Alternatively, the JW Anderson Pierce bag is another daring-yet-obvious choice.

Image credit: Jonathan Daniel Pryce

Sagittarius

23 November – 21 December

A love of travel, a knack for adventure and an inclination for humour epitomise the well-rounded character of a Sagittarius. A fire sign ruled by the planet Jupiter, bag lovers born in this month are hungry to see all that the world has to offer—by way of physical travel or a transformative accessory from the heart of Paris, London or Milan. The tongue-in-cheek bags of Jeremy Scott for Moschino will make lighthearted, conversational companions, whereas a Louis Vuitton keepall will fit everything you need while on the go. A fuschia Chanel carryon, on the other hand, will do both.

One day not long ago, I met the photographer Jack Davison at a café in Brooklyn, during the slow hours of the afternoon. He had been beckoned Stateside from his home in London to do a commercial shoot for Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen’s luxury fashion line, the Row, but he had spent that day wandering the streets of Chinatown, where, he informed me, he took a lot of great pictures of hands. He clicked through some of the images on a palm-size point-and-shoot digital camera, which has been his instrument of choice lately. He told me that, because of the machine’s unobtrusiveness, the subjects he’s hired to photograph sometimes think he’s an assistant: “They are, like, ‘When is the actual photographer and the camera coming?’ ”

The misconception might also have something to do with Davison’s startling youth. Twenty-eight years old, baby-faced and affable, he has been shooting editorial work for the likes of the Times Magazine, British Vogue, and various cultish brands (Craig Green, Margaret Howell) since he was barely out of college; his first monograph, titled simply “Photographs,” was released in May. And his work, with its moody chiaroscuro, vintage Kodachrome palette, and Mannerist emotionality, seems to have been ripped out of the pages of glossy magazines from an era when Irving Penn and Richard Avedon were still huddled underneath their dark cloths, and Ralph Gibson and Saul Leiter still prowled the streets.

This anachronistic flavor, Davison explained, is mostly due to his unorthodox photographic education. Raised in rural Essex, in the southeast of England, Davison began making pictures at the age of fifteen. “I just kind of co-opted the family camera, which was a tiny point-and-shoot, and was just, like, ‘I’ll be doing the family photos from now on,’ ” he said. He honed his eye by following his taste, wicking vintage images off of the Internet and into file folders that he keeps on his desktop to this day. They include the canonical photographers of the golden age of editorial photography, though their famous names meant nothing to him at the time. “I would love all those pictures, and I’d look for them in new magazines and not find them anywhere,” he said.

Critics often make a point of the fact that Davison is self-taught—in college, he studied English literature. But he noted that the characterization is not strictly true. As a teen-ager, through the image-sharing site Flickr, he found a mentor, a street photographer named Brett Walker, who ran a ragtag salon out of his London apartment. “I went down and I started to get my ass kicked,” Davison recalled. “Because he was, like, ‘This is shit, this is wrong.’ ” Walker, too, had been a precociously successful professional, and he also gravitated to the work of old-school picture-makers, such as Man Ray. He has been Davison’s lodestar for the past decade, and receives an effusive dedication in the back of his book.

But, whereas Walker’s work skews toward hard-edged realism, Davison’s has drifted into the realm of dreams. A man’s rain-spattered back becomes a looming edifice that we seem beckoned to scale. A hovering dot painted on an alley wall appears transformed into a luminous moon, propped up by a rusted wire trellis and cradled by a shadow hand, and a wild-eyed dog, all Tic Tac white teeth and blurred fur, is a living incarnation of our rapacious anxieties. But, just as in dreams, things are not always what they seem. “This one, which looks terrifying,” Davison said, of the dog picture, “is just a Labrador trying to eat ham.”

Share

22nd Jul 2019

While on the set of her August 2019 cover shoot for Vogue Australia, Elle Macpherson gets close and personal with her two sons Cy, 16 and Flynn, 21, and tells us her what makes her feel her happiest.

“I’m a morning person, I love the morning light, I like sunrises and I like that quiet time in the morning before everyone is up,” Macpherson says in our video. “Often I’ll start the day with a fresh celery juice. And then I move on to make a green smoothie. It’s all about the greens, so I love greens, any kind of greens.”

The supermodel had never done a family shoot with her boys—until now, when the stars aligned and the timing felt right. “It’s not the first opportunity but it was the first time we truly came together as a team and said okay, it’s Vogue, it’s Australia, it’s iconic”.

As the 55-year-old tells us, she had a ball working closely with her two beloved sons. “And I’m getting to work with those gorgeous boys. I get undivided attention, which happens very really, let me tell you,” Macpherson giggles. “How cool to be able to have this memory of all our coming ages, Cy’s just turned 16, Flynn’s just turned 21. I’m turning 55, and we’re at home in Australia. It’s spring break and we just felt these images that we’d be so happy to have for us.”

Watch the full video below. 

Click Here: toulon rugby shop melbourne