Category: News

Home / Category: News

Why every day needs to be World Oceans Day

June 12, 2019 | News | No Comments

Share

11th Jun 2019

Did you know the plastic in your clothes is polluting the oceans with every wash? That up to 80 per cent of the oxygen we breathe comes from marine life? And that our oceans could be dead by 2048, if we carry on as we are? These are just a few of the stark facts that designer-turned-activist Cyrill Gutsch – who founded non-profit Parley for the Oceans in 2012 – is presenting, loud and clear, when we speak ahead of World Oceans Day 2019.

“[It’s] a global plastic emergency,” Gutsch tells. “We are driving species into extinction that have a critical role in keeping the whole environmental system up and running. If we kill all this life out there, it’s very hard for us to exist.” Faced with this chilling prospect, Gutsch is on a definite mission to clean up the oceans, and convince as many people as he can to join him. Parley’s approach to finding solutions is three-fold, encapsulated by its AIR strategy: Avoid plastic; Intercept it from our oceans; and Redesign the material itself.

While most people are aware that single-use plastic is a huge problem, many don’t consider other daily pollutants – the plastic microfibres in clothes, for example, which are released into the environment with every wash. That’s just one of the reasons why the fashion industry is top of Gutsch’s target list. Parley for the Oceans has partnered with brands including Adidas and Stella McCartney, designing collaborative collections using its trademarked upcycled Ocean Plastic®. “You have to get [brands] to be ocean champions,” Gutsch explains.

Here, he tells why every day needs to be World Oceans Day – and the action we need to take to preserve the future of our planet.

On why we need to take action now
“We can’t be the ones causing the extinction of all these species, and the extinction of our own species. This is about our own survival. I think people need to really understand that it’s not only about the future of their kids; it’s about their own future. It’s not a sci-fi scenario anymore; we are already in the sixth mass extinction event.”

Click Here: toulon rugby shop melbourne
World Ocean Day should be every day. Image credit: Parley for the Oceans

On why he’s focusing on plastic
Plastic is a very visible threat; it’s a symbol of the toxic age we’re living in. [At Parley for the Oceans] we wanted to prove that we could create a huge wave around plastic and make everyone understand this material has to go. We have to stop exploiting the oceans [and] exploiting nature. But plastic is not the only problem; what’s happening with plastic has to happen with every material that is toxic.”

On what the fashion industry can do
“I think the specific challenges of the fashion industry are materials and packaging. What the fashion industry has to do is find replacements for all these toxic materials. I think that’s the biggest opportunity for fashion to make a difference, because the moment the fashion industry uses new materials – let’s call them future materials – they will have an impact on every other industry, because people look towards fashion for inspiration.”

World Ocean Day should be every day. Image credit: Parley for the Oceans

On the small steps everyone can do to help
You could give up single-use plastic – that could be a first step. The second step could be stop eating so much meat and seafood. And the last step could be reducing your carbon footprint; don’t fly and take the car so often. Everybody can become an ambassador of the cause by changing her or his individual lifestyle. You [don’t have to be] one hundred per cent [sustainable]; if a single action is multiplied by a billion – or by five or seven billion people on this planet – these problems disappear overnight.”

On why we need to move beyond sustainability
“I think it’s about eco-innovation; being a futurist and shaping this planet. We have to start a new economy that is based on new technologies, new materials. That is exciting; that is challenging.”

World Ocean Day should be every day. Image credit: Parley for the Oceans

The world was gifted its first look at Khloé Kardashian and Tristan Thompson’s baby girl, True, born April 12, on her one month birthday. Kardashian can be heard wishing her daughter a happy birthday in the video she shared to both Instagram and Snapchat, “Happy one month old mumma, I love you pretty girl.”

Image credit: Instagram.com/khloekardashian

The world got its first partial look at Stormi Webster, born February 1 2018, on February 7 when Kylie Jenner posted an image of the newborn holding her thumb on Instagram, captioned “stormi webster”.

Image credit: Instagram.com/kyliejenner

Yet it wasn’t until Stormi was just over one month old before we were blessed with an image that revealed her entire face. Travis Scott took to Instagram with an image of his baby girl surrounded by flame emojis captioned, “Our little rager !!!!”

Image credit: Instagram.com/travisscott

Our first look at Chicago West, born via a surrogate on January 15 2018, was technically via Kylie Jenner’s pregnancy video, however the little one made her official debut on Instagram at just over a month old. Kim Kardashian shared an image of herself and the newborn on February 27 complete with a filter captioned, “Baby Chicago”.

Image credit: Instagram.com/kimkardashian

Although we may have already been introduced to Chicago, her face was partially skewed by a filter, so when Kardashian shared the first clear image of the newborn captioned “Morning cutie” at just over two months old, we couldn’t help but savour the moment. 

Image credit: Instagram.com/kimkardashian

The world met Saint —Kardashian and Kanye West’s second child born on December 5 2015—via an Instagram post. At just a little over two months old, an image of the baby stretching out with his eyes closed was posted on the social media platform by Kardashian captioned “SAINT WEST”.

Image credit: Instagram.com/kimkardashian

An image of North West, born June 15 2013, at just 10 weeks old was first made public by Kanye West when he appeared on The Kris Jenner Show in August. The photo was then shared by Kardashian on Instagram captioned “NORTH”.

Image credit: Instagram.com/kimkardashian

Kourtney Kardashian shared the first official image of Reign Aston Disick, born December 14 2014, on Instagram almost four months after she welcomed him into the world. “My little turtle dove angel baby boy Reign Aston Disick,” she captioned the photo.

Image credit: Instagram.com/kourtneykardash

Penelope Scotland Disick, born July 8 2012, made her first public appearance on the cover of Us Weekly alongside her mother and older brother Mason—clearly before Instagram was a thing. 

Image credit: Instagram.com/kourtneykardash

Mason, Kourtney’s first born welcomed on December 14 2009, was the first Kardashian offspring  to make his debut on the cover of a magazine, shot alongside both this mother and father Scott Disick for Life & Style at just eight days old.

Image credit: Instagram.com/kourtneykardash

Exclusive images of Dream Renne Kardashian, the daughter of Rob Kardashian and Blac Chyna born on November 10 2016, were released on the day of her birth by E! News. Chyna then took to Instagram the following day with a video of the newborn captioned, “Dream Renee Kardashian”.

Image credit: Instagram.com/blacchyna

Exactly one month after Kim Kardashian West and Kanye West welcomed their fourth child, Psalm West, via surrogate on May 11, Kardashian West took to Instagram to treat her fans to their first close-up look at the newborn. While she did share an image of her son shortly after his birth, it was taken from a distance. Captioning the latest post “Psalm Ye” the reality star has also left the world wondering whether or not this also marks the debut of the child’s middle name. If there is one thing that we do know for certain, it’s that Psalm looks remarkably like his older sister, Chicago West. 

Image credit: Instagram.com/kimkardashian

Click Here: cheap kanken backpack

Football fever has officially set in – and expect it to last until at least July 7 – as the Fifa Women’s World Cup kicks off. Over the coming weeks, 24 countries will compete in France in a bid to be crowned global champions. The favourites? USA and host team France, closely followed by England and Germany.

The beautiful game has taken a giant step towards gender equality too, with Nike creating kits specifically tailored to the female players – as opposed to simply tailored from the men’s version as before – for 14 of the competing nations.  

Click Here: cheap kanken backpack

Away from the pitch, there’s plenty of competition too, with fans pledging their allegiance in style. Expect plenty of bespoke shirts and face paint to match. Nike’s latest collaboration – which enlisted streetwear stalwarts Marine Serre, Ambush’s Yoon Ahn, Koché’s Christelle Kocher and MadeMe’s Erin Magee to reinvent the football jersey ahead of the international tournament – is sure to make an pitch-side appearance or two. Here, ‘s Nicole Gomes captures the best fan looks at the Women’s World Cup 2019.

Sarah Burton calls the clothing she designs at Alexander McQueen a “soft armor for women.” Since assuming the creative director position in 2010 after Lee Alexander McQueen’s untimely death, Burton has built each of her pieces of armor as a balance of dichotomies that will be instantly relatable to every woman out there: fragile and functional, laden with history and free to sprint into the future, strictly posh and proper, yet aggressively wild and punk.

Her runways are some of the most diverse in Paris, bringing women from around the world together—many ages, shapes, and sizes—to walk as warriors and princesses. The full picture, completed by custom sets and music, is so rich with meaning and drama, it could make your head spin were your eyes not glamoured by the sheer beauty of it all. Most of all, Burton’s work is beautiful. Some would argue that in a time of anti-choice legislation, a time of Brexit, a time of Trump that beauty has no merit because beauty can’t save us.

Those people have clearly never quietly fastened themselves in to one of Burton’s dresses, kissing each button into its closure in a secret, sensual dance. Yes, the clothes she designs are empirically beautiful, but her vision of beauty is not an imposition. As much as her work is about fantasy and phantasms and olde magick, it’s also about the real world, real women, and lace-up black leather boots that you can walk in from the subway to the office comfortably.

A master tailor, she can cut a gown made of magical ruffles, a savvy but never strict cinched suit, and everything in between, her oeuvre reading like an index of wardrobe musts for a thoroughly badass modern woman. As woman designer standing with women, Burton creates this validating, embracing beauty with a deft hand, a seemingly endless arsenal of historicism and romanticism, and a deep-seated appreciation of craft and English heritage.

She will be the first to tell you that she learned the importance of these values from Lee Alexander McQueen, the house’s storied founder. It was 1996 when Burton, just 21 years old, arrived to McQueen’s atelier on internship placement from Central Saint Martins. More than 20 years later, she is still there, now the leader of a strong, close-knit team of craftspeople, many of whom have been on the job for nearly as long as Burton herself. She carries Lee’s work and passions deep within her, and, in a way, in every collection she creates. “He will always be such a huge part of who I am and such a huge part of me creatively, because I grew up with all of his beliefs and creativity,” she says. But in assuming the role of creative director, she’s grown intent on bringing out aspects of herself on the runway.

Her autumn/winter ‘19/’20 collection, presented in Paris this March, was her most introspective yet. She took her team up to the North of England, where she was raised, around Yorkshire, to commune with the area’s mills, looms, and hillsides. Each look borne from this trip is rich with narrative. Consider a dress that turns traditional looming heddles into whooshing sequins that shimmied and whirred as the model walked down the runway, the sound itself a callback to the hubbub of a factory at its busiest hour. Elsewhere, studio scraps are made into embroideries; snap closures are used as embellishment along the long lines of a knit dress; Northern symbols like the owl of Leeds, the seagull of Blackpool, and the cormorant of Liverpool wrap around a cascading skirt in lace; and bias-draped, tailored jackets proudly display a “Made in England” label.

The most resplendent of all are the three rose dresses in black, fuchsia, and red, each cut and draped from a single piece of fabric. In Middle English, the language of the War of the Roses, a second meaning of the word flower was “the best state of things” or “its prime.” Beautiful, thorny, regal, and delicate, these best-in-class dresses draw inspiration from the White Rose of York and the Red Rose of Lancaster, symbols of England’s warring houses of yore, and from the Northern tradition of crowning a local girl the rose queen during springtime spectacles. You could also say that these stately dresses were drawn from all the unsung rose queens who have bloomed and wilted up in the Pennines and in Scotland and on this earth since Margaret of Anjou sat by the throne, ruling in her husband’s absences and suffering through a war when she did not produce an heir for her madman spouse.

It’s never been easy to be a woman. Burton is keenly aware of this. Lucky for the rest of us, she has constructed each of her McQueen collections to be the scaffolding that will help keep us upright, inspired, and emboldened. It is this that has made her the de facto couturier of Catherine the Duchess of Cambridge, whose wedding dress she designed in 2010, and of powerful women the world over. To get real British with it: Alfred Tennyson wrote in an 1842 ode, “A simple maiden in her flower/ Is worth a hundred coats of arms.” With Burton, you don’t have to choose. You can be a maiden and a king slayer in cinched blood red leather tailoring or a marine blue corset with lace paneling. The promise of Sarah Burton’s Alexander McQueen is that you can be, always, in the flower of your life.

In advance of receiving the CFDA’s International Award, Burton chatted with Vogue about her fashion past, present, and future and revealed the making of one of her majestic rose dresses.

I’d like to start as close to the beginning as we can, without making this a 10-hour conversation!
[laughs]

You first took the helm of the brand in 2010, which was almost a decade ago. How did you feel at the time?
“Well, really, I was so lucky to work for Lee. I started to work with Lee in 1996, and I had this amazing time of my life. He was this incredible man, and I very much grew up with McQueen. I started when I was 21 and I continued there until he died. It was all-encompassing; it was this magical place focused on storytelling and creativity, and very, very personal and like a family.

The initial thing that I thought [when I assumed the creative director role] was that Lee was this storyteller and I was kind of good at finishing his sentences, but I realised I had to begin the sentences and it had to be about my stories. Lee always said to me, “You have to make things your own, you have to believe in it, and it has to be an emotional thing, what we do.” I think at the very beginning I was wondering, Okay, how do you make it yourself? So much time has passed since the years Lee was here, but he will always be such a huge part of who I am and such a huge part of me creatively, because I grew up with all of his beliefs and creativity. We were finding how to be true to what McQueen is—which I didn’t ever find a problem with because I was a part of Lee’s world—but, yet, make it our own. That was the challenge.

The collections had to, for me, remain very strong [around] creativity, empowerment of women, craft and technology, man and machine. It has evolved as time goes by, but it always stays true to that. What was amazing was that [Lee] was very clear, black and white, about what McQueen was. He always defined that. The breadth of the house is huge: there’s tailoring, couture dresses, there’s denim, there’s punk, there’s everything. You have a such a rich history to play with; that’s what is so incredible about McQueen, you have all of these worlds and you know who the woman is—it’s so clear who the woman is. Each season is about finding a way to tell her story in a different way or a different part of her story. The way that the team works together is very much like a creative community, and we have a big breadth of stories that we try to tell. I really feel quite lucky.”

Do you feel like your approach to designing each collection has grown or changed over the past 10 years?
“I think, yes, it has. About three years ago I started doing a lot of research trips. So much is done on computers now, and when you Google something, everybody gets the same image. I really, strongly believe that the great thing about McQueen is that [we believe] creativity comes from everywhere and inspiration comes from everywhere, so by going to, say, the Yorkshire mills, you would experience something that someone wouldn’t see from looking at a book and definitely not from looking at a computer. I think that [creativity] is very, very embedded in emotion and what an individual or my team gets from that experience of going somewhere and talking to people.

Also, in a way, my approach is changing because you grow up and you become very aware of what you want to say. It has changed in the way that we’re becoming more personal. The last collection was so personal for me. It’s always looking at the McQueen stories from [your own] point of view, and then the last collection was really being about going home and making it […] about my story within the McQueen world.”

How do you choose where to go on these research trips? In reading the four- or five-page show notes from the autumn/winter ‘19/’20 collection, which was borne from a trip to Yorkshire, I learned so much about England and mills and birds and roses—it’s better than a history book. Do you know these histories instinctively or are you also constantly researching different places in England?
“Well, I’ve always had a fascination with nature. Last time [for spring 2019] we went to Wiltshire, to the chalk horses; I used to go there as a child. Shetland, I’d never been before, but I knew Scotland was part of Lee’s heritage, so it made me want to go there [for the spring 2017 collection]. When we went to Manchester, I knew about the suffragettes, but I’d never been to their houses before and learned all about them. You know things before you go, but you learn so much more from being there.

What I love about doing a research trip is that when you go on these journeys, not only do you go on a physical journey, but you also kind of go on a journey with your team. I have a team from all over the world. They all focus on different things, and I learn as we go. It’s really very rich, from a personal point of view to do these research trips, and I find it like social history as well; maybe you see things that you wouldn’t have noticed if you didn’t go to that place.

When we went to the Yorkshire mills, there was a tub, a Coffee-Mate I think it was, and in it were all these heddles, which are the needles you use to weave on a loom. That became a dress. You see the unexpected things that trigger something in your imagination. When Lee was here he would pick something up from a book or a piece of rubbish on the street and it could become anything. That’s what’s so amazing about McQueen, is that ability to see something in everything.”

How do you filter what you see on these trips into the collection?
“It’s so organic. I took a picture of the coffee pot [with the heddles in it] and said to Alessandro, my embroidery designer who was next to me, “That’s a good sequin for a dress.” Then it became the dress. In my head I already knew what it was going to be. As the fabric was coming off the loom, I thought, Okay, that’s great, that can be the drape of the jacket. It’s quite immediate, actually. Alessandro saw some scraps on the floor and said, “We can make this into an embroidery on a coat.” So it is really very organised, the process. Then it’s the same back in the studio. It’s constantly evolving, [and] that’s what’s great.

We never say, “That’s it, it’s done, it’s finished.” Sometimes we design the collection before the holidays, and then we come back and feel like, “Oh, God, we want to change it all.” That’s also part of the beauty of the process, that you’re never finished. It’s very McQueen to never finish until it’s actually on the catwalk, which is sometimes a bit stressful! [laughs] There’s always work! But I really do like to express that. I learned with Lee that it’s constantly evolving and [that we are] constantly trying to improve it. It’s not about disregarding something or saying something doesn’t work. It’s about pushing yourself and your team to try different things.”

I think that is what makes your work so poignant; you can tell it’s about the process. It’s not just, “Let’s make a dress because we have to make a dress.”
“It’s exactly that, honestly … I think what I really like doing is allowing each garment to have a narrative of its own. It’s not just that we need to get a dress done, “it’s got to be knee-length” or “floor-length” or something like that. That’s why I’m so lucky that I’m allowed that creative process and that we have an amazing atelier here. You can create something, and, if you want, cut it up and turn it upside down. We’re very lucky to have that process here, to work in that way. And, like I said, sometimes you get there and it’s like, “Oh, that doesn’t work at all!” [laughs] or “That’s great!” or “Let’s save it for next season.” The process is as important as the clothing.”

It sounds delightfully fun, I have to say.
“It is fun!”

The rose dresses at the end of the autumn/winter ‘19/’20 show are all one piece of fabric that is molded together and then explodes outwards. What’s the story behind these?
“With the rose dresses, I remember as a child there was the rose queen in our village—I thought everyone had a rose queen. When I went up north, I learned it was to do with Yorkshire and Lancaster, the War of the Roses, and the [English] Church, so you learn something about your own history, combining memories and history. There was all this fabric in the studio and then there was the beautiful Egon Schiele painting that I remembered. I knew I wanted the rose to explode from her neck, and then it grew. Then it became a symbol of femininity, with the volume of the fabric molded onto the corset and then exploding out the top and bottom. And it also kind of nodded, to me, to Elizabeth I.

To make the last dress, we started off with this huge piece of red fabric. Then we stitched—I would say pin-tuck but it’s not pin-tucked because that’s too small, but we pleated and seamed about 50 seams along the width of the fabric. Then I left about two metres on each end, molded it on to a corset base, and then on the model, draped it around her neck so it created this sort of rough shape with her legs exposed. Really, what was so interesting about those dresses was that the fabric dictated what the dress did, but then it became almost pruned. I have an amazing patternmaker called Judy, so I started to create it, and then Judy almost grew these roses with me. It really took on a life of its own.

I like the fact that there’s a sense of a female empowerment, but also a vulnerability, femininity, and beauty. It’s not embellished or embroidered, and it’s actually quite light, so it was very much a lesson in fabric, working with the fabric to create the silhouette. I love that it felt very feminine but strong, but like I said they did sort of grow in the studio. Sometimes they got really big—[laughs]—and then we had to prune them back.”

We’ve talked a little bit about femininity, but what are some of the values you want to express through your collections and runway shows?
“Being at McQueen, it’s always been about empowering women, it’s always been about a woman who’s strong. It’s very much a woman who is strong for herself, I feel. I really believe that a woman shouldn’t just have to dress like a man to feel strong. That’s why I really love to play with tailoring mixed with a woman’s dress. On Vittoria [Ceretti] there was a jacket with an exploded rose at the hem. It has a masculine tailoring at the top and then a very feminine rose. I want to show how important it is to be a woman still. You don’t have to take away your emotions and your feelings—it’s okay to feel vulnerable and have imperfections. I think that idea of strength and femininity are really important. I always like to say that in a way it’s almost like soft armor for women, so that you feel empowered, but not overwhelmed.”

There is also a strong current of British heritage and craft in each collection; why is that important for you to include?
“I really believe in craft. You know, Lee started on Savile Row making incredible tailored jackets, and he has always been, even in the very end, a proponent of making things by hand. I feel very lucky I started working with Lee at a time where it was like, “Okay, you sew four jackets or three pairs of trousers.” It was done in a very atelier kind of way, with the embroidery done by hand by five people in the studio. I have such a huge appreciation for what people do with their hands, whether it be knitting in Scotland or embroidery or the mills of the North. I think it’s really something that’s been lost, especially in this country, and I think people don’t really know it exists or know how important the people in the sewing room are. There are so many people that make beautiful things. It really is something that needs to be celebrated more in many ways. I think the human hand is irreplaceable.

It’s about celebrating handcraft so it’s not lost, but also finding ways that it can work for today. It was interesting, when I went to Yorkshire and saw the looms. They have to thread every heddle by hand, then it goes through the whole machine, and then at the end it comes out and there is a woman who mends the imperfections of the machine. It’s this funny way of how man and machine can work together. It’s quite often we do these hand-crocheted samples in the studio of knits, but then it goes to Italy where they can make incredible knitting that looks like lace. I feel the same about drawing; drawing is so important. Our embroideries are all hand drawn first by somebody downstairs. To be able to still do that is amazing. All those hand-printed designs we did on the leather [for spring 2019], it’s really great to have people who can do that and to preserve those skills because it’s really important.

The other thing about craft is it brings people together, it brings communities together. People come together as a family. It’s a very healing thing to do as well. I think that’s how the studio works, as a community.”

Craft is also deeply embedded in English heritage. It seems to me that some of the factories you’ve visited have existed in England since the dawn of time.
“Yes, yes, completely that. It’s very much a part of who we are as a nation. We actually have a school in Shetland where we’ve sponsored hand knitting for children because we want to encourage the children to learn to knit from an early age, otherwise, one day, it will all be gone.”

How do you balance the creative and the craft with the bottom line of running a business?
“What’s so amazing at McQueen is that it always starts with creativity. I’ve always been aware of commercial, but it’s always about the show first. The show always comes first. But the most important thing is you want those clothes to be living and breathing because we work in a world where we want women to feel empowered. We want people to wear them and think, Oh, my God, I feel amazing in this. You don’t want them to be pieces that are put away somewhere; you want them to be alive.

I’ve always been fascinated in what sells. Where we’re very lucky at McQueen is that the more McQueen it is, the more it sells. I work with a merchandiser, Karen, who has been here for almost 18 years; she is great and we discuss that it is very important that a garment looks like McQueen. We don’t sell things that are basic or don’t have the silhouette, or the fabrication, or the beauty—those are the things that people want from McQueen. They want something that is special and beautiful that you can’t find anywhere else.

Click Here: kanken mini cheap

The other thing that I feel that is really important as well is a kind of timelessness. Especially in a world where we have so much of everything, I think you have to make a jacket for somebody that is different from everything else, that makes them feel a certain way, and that they can keep forever. I have pieces of McQueen from years ago; I’ve got a jacket that I still wear now and still treasure that is still as relevant today as it was 15 years ago. I think that’s really important.”

What does it mean to you to receive the CFDA International Award?
“It’s a real honour. I feel very, very honoured. I was just thinking last night that I actually came with Lee when he got his [in 2003], so it’s really quite a thing for me to get one because I remember how pleased Lee was when he got his, and coming [to New York] and celebrating that. It’s really a very, very special thing.”

This article originally appeared on Vogue.com.

Elizabeth Warren’s Theory of the Case

June 11, 2019 | News | No Comments

Suddenly, Elizabeth Warren’s Presidential campaign is getting a lot of attention. When nineteen Democratic candidates converged on Cedar Rapids, Iowa, on Sunday, for a dinner and a speakers’ forum, the Massachusetts senator and former Harvard Law School professor was one of the standouts, Politico reported. A poll of Democratic voters in the Hawkeye State for the Des Moines Register, Mediacom, and CNN showed Warren moving into third place, just one percentage point behind Bernie Sanders. “Warren is experiencing something unusual in the crowded Democratic field: momentum,” Michael Scherer wrote, in the Washington Post.

To explain Warren’s surge in the polls, the obvious place to start is the plethora of policy proposals she has unveiled. In the past six weeks alone, her campaign has published plans to promote green manufacturing and tackle climate change, end the opioid crisis, provide debt relief to Puerto Rico, insure that sitting Presidents can be indicted for criminal wrongdoing, reduce corporate influence at the Pentagon, and guarantee women access to abortion. These are on top of Warren’s earlier proposals to provide universal childcare, cancel student debt and abolish tuition fees at public colleges, invest five hundred billion dollars in affordable housing over ten years, break up the tech giants, eliminate the Electoral College, insure that major corporations pay taxes on their profits, and introduce a new tax on the ultra-wealthy.

At a time when many of the Democratic candidates are still settling on their campaign themes and at best unveiling one or two big policy proposals, the ambition and level of detail in Warren’s plans have put her at an advantage. Her Web site now features two calculators that people can use to figure out how much money the student-debt and childcare proposals would save them. (For example, a person with a hundred thousand dollars in debt who earns seventy-five thousand dollars a year would save fifty thousand dollars from the loan-cancellation plan.) The slew of wonky ideas from Warren’s policy shop has even spawned a campaign slogan that the candidate uses in her stump speeches which is emblazoned on T-shirts and bags for sale on her Web site: “Warren Has a Plan for That.”

Clear policy ideas are an essential part of any campaign, but they don’t guarantee success. During the 2016 campaign, Hillary Clinton put forward dozens of them, including universal preschool, a Medicare “buy-in” for those fifty-five and older, a public option inside Obamacare, the abolishment of tuition fees at public colleges for students from families with middle incomes, and a substantial tax hike on the richest 0.1 per cent. For whatever reason, Clinton struggled to tie them all together in a comprehensive message that resonated outside Democratic strongholds.

This isn’t the place to rehash the 2016 campaign. But one takeaway from that searing experience is that running a Presidential campaign isn’t like operating a store, where people come in and buy the goods they want. It’s more like being a prosecutor in a complicated trial: you have to provide an over-all theory of the case that ties things together and wins over the jury. From the beginning, Warren has been attempting to do this.

Click Here: kanken mini cheap

In February, she kicked off her campaign in the former textile town of Lawrence, Massachusetts, where, in 1912, female millworkers walked off the job to protest low wages and harsh working conditions. Warren opened her speech with an account of the strike. Then she shifted focus, saying, “Today, millions and millions and millions of American families are also struggling to survive in a system that has been rigged by the wealthy and the well-connected. Hardworking people are up against a small group that holds far too much power, not just in our economy but also in our democracy. Like the women of Lawrence, we are here to say enough is enough!”

Warren went on to detail some of the features of an economic system she said that was “rigged,” including stagnant wages, rising health-care costs, declining rates of intergenerational mobility, corporate tax cuts, and subsidies for corporate polluters. “To protect their economic advantages, the rich and powerful have rigged our political system as well,” she went on. “Today our government works just great for oil companies and defense contractors, great for private prisons, great for Wall Street banks and hedge funds. It’s just not working for anyone else.”

To those unfamiliar with Warren, it may seem like she borrowed some phrases from the Sanders campaign of 2016, but she’s been using this sort of language for years. Warren made her academic reputation as an expert on how bankruptcy laws affect middle-class families, and, after the great financial crisis, she was the driving force in setting up the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which the Trump Administration has been busy downsizing. Tearing into big businesses and feckless bankers comes naturally to the former schoolteacher from Oklahoma. As I noted in January, “in many ways she is a modern version of a prairie populist, inveighing against the trusts, the plutocrats, and their corrupt political allies.”

In the midwest last week, Warren criticized General Electric, Levi’s, and other companies for shifting production abroad and shuttering American factories. After unveiling yet another plan—“A Plan for Economic Patriotism”—she attended a town-hall meeting with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes, where she said that the people of Fort Wayne, Indiana, “understand that leaving it to a handful of giant multinational corporations to build our economy just isn’t working. You know, those big corporations, they don’t have any loyalty to America. They don’t have any loyalty to American workers. They have loyalty to exactly one thing, and that is their own profits. And what we’ve got to do is we’ve got to have a government that doesn’t say, hey, whatever it is that the giant multinational corporations want, let us help you. . . .we need this country to work for working people. And that’s what we’re going to do.”

The lambasting of footloose corporations echoed some of Donald Trump’s campaign rhetoric, and it earned Warren praise from an unexpected source: Tucker Carlson, of Fox News. But the policy prescriptions that Warren unveiled are very different from the tariffs and other protectionist measures that Trump has introduced. They include expanding worker-training programs and providing more apprenticeships, giving more financial support to exporters, beefing up subsidies for research and development, and using the federal procurement budget to promote key U.S. industries. Warren would also consolidate the Commerce Department and other federal agencies, such as the Small Business Administration and the Patent and Trademark Office, in a new Department of Economic Development, whose mission would be “to promote sustainable, middle-class American jobs.”

Robert Reich, the former Labor Secretary, pointed out that these proposals, together with Warren’s $1.5 trillion plan to boost green manufacturing, amount to an effort to create an industrial policy based on the German model. You can argue about whether this type of approach would work in this country, but to simply dismiss it as un-American would be a mistake. For many decades now, the Pentagon has effectively been operating an industrial policy through its vast outlays on armaments and its substantial research budget. Perhaps not coincidentally, American companies now dominate a number of industries that do a lot of business with the Pentagon, such as aerospace, defense, and telecommunications.

In any case, Warren’s latest plan is another illustration of how her campaign is trying to fashion a coherent response, not just to Trump but to the deep-seated problems that helped give him his opening. Having been on the receiving end of the President’s jibes often, Warren shows indisputable contempt for Trump and an eagerness to get rid of him. After a redacted version of the Mueller report was released, she was one of the first Democratic candidates to call for impeachment. But, in addition to positioning herself as someone with the toughness to confront and beat Trump, Warren is asking Democratic voters to keep an eye on the broader picture. As she explained back in February, “the man in the White House is not the cause of what’s broken, he’s just the latest — and most extreme — symptom of what’s gone wrong in America.”

Many classic children’s books beg for philosophical readings: the likes of “Charlotte’s Web” or “Are You My Mother?” are well known as complex and subterranean ruminations on death and identity and community. Had you asked me a couple of years ago, I would not have classified Peggy Parish’s Amelia Bedelia series with this loftier group—my children delighted in the wordplay, but I found the books a bit one-note.

Yet the more I read Amelia Bedelia the more unsettled I felt; I began to suspect that I wasn’t hearing all the notes. The books depict a young woman who sows domestic chaos in and around the home of her wealthy employers, a snooty older couple who have outsourced the labor of keeping their household, family, and community relations running smoothly. Each book follows a simple formula: Amelia Bedelia, a housemaid replete with apron and frilled cap, encounters various domestic imperatives: clean the house, host a party, babysit, substitute-teach. But, rather than keeping order, Amelia Bedelia creates disarray. She takes each instruction she is given with an absurd literalism. “Draw the drapes,” Mrs. Rogers tells her; Amelia Bedelia reaches for pen and paper. She “dresses the chicken,” but in overalls. When asked to “dust the furniture,” she sprinkles powder all over the living room; asked to “change the towels,” she takes scissors to them. She dirties and destroys her employer’s possessions, in other words, breaking one of the primary taboos of domestic employment. She’s a figure of rebellion: against the work that women do in the home, against the work that lower-class women do for upper-class women. Her one undeniable talent—the reason that the Rogerses keep her around—is as a pastry chef: cream puffs, tea cakes, pies, tarts. Every time the Rogerses are about to cast her aside, every time they are “angry, very angry,” she entices them back by appealing to their appetites.

As an employee who produces turmoil at work and is overseen by amiable jerks, Amelia Bedelia reminds me of Bartleby, from Herman Melville’s short story “Bartleby, the Scrivener,” from 1853. “I would prefer not to” is Bartleby’s famous refrain; if he took Amelia’s job, Bartleby would neither pull the drapes from the windows nor sketch them with pen and paper but sit and stare at them with stoic despondence. Melville’s story is one of American literature’s great tales of workplace degradation, and, though it takes place in an office, it is in some ways as domestic, as intimate, as a story about a household servant—Bartleby, increasingly depressed, begins sleeping and living at his workplace. But, where Bartleby responds to degradation by withdrawing, reducing, starving himself, Amelia Bedelia produces sugary excess. Throughout her daily grind, she cheerfully acquiesces to her lot even as she subverts almost every task assigned to her. Bartleby teaches us to look for resistance in forms of ascetic refusal; Amelia Bedelia turns passive aggression into a kind of art.

Parish was born into a poor family in small-town South Carolina in 1927; her mother died when she was young, and her father had no formal education beyond the fourth grade. Parish’s biography is murky—few scholars or writers have taken her as a subject, despite what seems to be a fascinating life path. Both she and her brother graduated from college, and Peggy eventually found her way to teaching the third grade at the Dalton School, one of New York City’s toniest private schools. The story she and her publisher have always told about the series is that it stemmed from the charming things that her students said in class; Parish dedicates “Teach Us, Amelia Bedelia” to “Miss Rose, my first-grade teacher, who introduced me to the magic of words.” And children do love how the books represent linguistic misunderstandings, which makes sense. The words we assign to so many elements of the world are complex and often confounding to children, and they need time and space to explore this confusion. (“What does ‘forgive’ mean?” “What is a truce?” “What’s a soft lockdown?” These are just the questions I got from my kids yesterday.)

Further Reading

More in this series on the power and pleasures of children’s books.

The first Amelia Bedelia book was published in 1963, the same year as Betty Friedan’s “The Feminine Mystique”; the series’ interest in wordplay, literalism, and figurative language is of a piece with its interest in the repetitive, devalued, yet highly intimate quality of women’s work. Perhaps more than other forms of work, domestic labor is often misnamed as love, duty, or some kind of irresistible biological calling. And that’s when it’s named at all; women’s work—the cooking, appointment-keeping, party-planning, soap-dispenser-refilling—is so often invisible. Parish’s books spotlight this labor, and refuse the sentimental fuzziness that usually attends it (especially when it is attached to a mother figure). In “Come Back, Amelia Bedelia” (my favorite), Mrs. Rogers is pushed to her limit when, having asked for coffee and cereal for breakfast, Amelia brings her a cup of coffee with cereal mixed into it. “Oh, you are impossible!” Mrs. Rogers exclaims. “You’re fired!” Not immediately understanding, Amelia Bedelia asks, “You mean you don’t want me anymore?” The storybook lines then break into something like verse: “Amelia Bedelia / got her bag. / And she went away.” (The white space around the lines provides room for children to feel the uncomfortable feelings.) Discarded and unmoored, Amelia Bedelia wanders around town responding to various “Help Wanted” signs. They’re all for pink-collar gigs—hairdresser, secretary, nurse—but she finds that she is no more wanted by these bosses than her own. She returns, as she always does, to the Rogerses, and readers learn, once again, about the messy entanglements of domestic labor, love, and power.

Read as a commentary on the complexity of women’s work—its incessant quality, its classed-ness—Amelia Bedelia feels as much a product of mid-twentieth-century feminism as “The Feminine Mystique,” Simone de Beauvoir’s “The Second Sex,” or Gwendolyn Brooks’s “Maud Martha.” Parish died suddenly in 1988, and the series fell fallow until her nephew Herman Parish revived it, in 1995. Under his authorship, the newer books have somewhat diluted Peggy Parish’s interest in domestic labor, resulting in “Amelia Bedelia 4 Mayor” (1999), “Calling Doctor Amelia Bedelia” (2002), and “Amelia Bedelia, Cub Reporter” (2012). Parish had kept her focus tight across twelve books, revealing all the actual labor that it took to keep home and community running, from hosting wedding showers to decorating for Christmas to making baby food. The later books remystify the domestic labor that Parish took pains to illuminate.

I came of age and entered the workforce steeped in this kind of mystification; it was the era of “girl power” and “having it all.” My youthful faith in those frameworks of intellectual and professional agency has cracked under the pressures of childcare, second and third shifts, glass ceilings, workplace pregnancy discrimination, and all the rest. When I read Amelia Bedelia to my children at night, they relish the silly wordplay and the chaos, while I take pleasure in both the joyful anarchy of her world and in how keenly Parish captures the feeling of women’s work: literal, unceasing, impossible to do perfectly, almost as absurd as dressing a chicken in overalls.

Click Here: kanken mini cheap

Too bad there isn’t a Tonys category that could have pitted King Kong against Cher. Biggest Diva? Most Likely to Stop Traffic in Midtown? Although both were represented on Broadway this season, neither made an appearance at Radio City Music Hall on Sunday night, where the seventy-third annual Tony Awards were presented. King Kong—or the technical wizards who engineered him onstage—received a special prize, while “The Cher Show” picked up awards for its lead actress (and the best Cher impersonator this side of “RuPaul’s Drag Race”), Stephanie J. Block, and for its costume designer, Bob Mackie, who never met a black-feather headdress he couldn’t make work. Try that on for size, ya big ape!

Hell was a big theme this year, thanks to “Hadestown,” Anaïs Mitchell’s boogie-woogie retelling of the Orpheus and Eurydice myth, which was nominated for fourteen awards and won eight, including Best Musical. (One of its competitors, “Beetlejuice,” also features a trip to the underworld.) The show supplied the most galvanizing speech of the night, from its furiously innovative director, Rachel Chavkin. “My folks raised me with the understanding that life is a team sport,” Chavkin began. “And so is walking out of Hell.” She was speaking not of the hopeless feeling you get two hours into an awards show, with half a dozen categories and three musical numbers somehow left to go, but of the faith required to fight the “power structures” that trick us into feeling alone. “And this is why I wish I wasn’t the only woman directing a musical on Broadway this season,” she continued, letting loose some fire emojis. “There are so many women who are ready to go. And we need to see that racial diversity and gender diversity reflected in our critical establishment, too. This is not a pipeline issue. It is a failure of imagination by a field whose job is to imagine the way the world could be.” If you aren’t yet convinced that Rachel Chavkin is hard-core, consider that she was saying this while pregnant as a surrogate for her gay best friend’s child.

The other memorable speech came from someone nearly fifty years Chavkin’s senior: Elaine May, who, at eighty-seven, won Leading Actress in a Play, for “The Waverly Gallery,” by Kenneth Lonergan, her first appearance on Broadway since 1966. May’s performance, as a woman losing a fight with dementia, was a marvel. But so was her speech, which was so full of charm and humility that you felt like she was somehow your new best friend. “At the end of the play, I died,” she told us. (No spoiler alert necessary; the play closed in January.) “Now, my death was described onstage by Lucas Hedges so brilliantly, and he described the death—my death—he described it so heartbreakingly, it was so touching, that, watching from the wings, I thought, I’m going to win this guy’s Tony.” Grinning, she gave a little “see you later” wave. Swoon.

The evening’s host, James Corden, could have used some of May’s casual self-assurance. A practiced vaudevillian, he seemed to pitch every comic bit from a defensive crouch, as if convinced that anyone watching the Tonys was doing it by accident or was hoping to see Neil Patrick Harris instead. His opening number informed us that theatre is live, unlike television, with “actual people in an actual space,” which is both inarguable and a strange thing to hear during a live television broadcast. Halfway through the show, Beetlejuice, played by the human sparkplug Alex Brightman, performed a menacingly funny number laced with drive-by jabs at celebrity audience members. (“Adam Driver, you killed Han Solo. Not cool, bro!”) The message was clear: Beetlejuice wants the hosting gig. And, by God, he deserves it.

Here’s a conundrum: How to represent the nominees for Best Play? The Tonys have never figured it out. You can cut to actors doing scenes, but that rarely translates well onscreen. You can get Whoopi Goldberg to give plot summaries, but that’s also less than ideal. This year, the playwrights themselves gave descriptions of their plays. It may have felt like listening to book reports, but it gave us the chance to see Heidi Schreck, Tarell Alvin McCraney, and, in monster-drag regalia, Taylor Mac. Jez Butterworth, the author of “The Ferryman,” ditched the synopsis on the teleprompter—“You can Google the play”—and took the time to thank Laura Donnelly, one of the play’s stars and the mother of his child. Granted, the play was based on her uncle’s murder during the Troubles, in Northern Ireland, but it felt like a premature acceptance speech. Later on, when Butterworth did win, he said, “I mentioned it earlier, but Laura Donnelly’s uncle was killed by the I.R.A.” Right. Got it. Another odd choice was to include a performance by only one of the Best Play nominees, a spiritual from McCraney’s “Choir Boy.” It was stirring, but Taylor Mac’s “Gary: A Sequel to Titus Andronicus” has an entire dance number featuring a chorus line of mechanical corpse penises. What gives?

While I’m grousing, the Tonys should really find a way to include both the awards for Original Score and Book of a Musical in the telecast, instead of relegating one or the other to the pre-show. This year, Robert Horn accepted his prize for the zinger-filled book of “Tootsie” off camera. The viewing audience also missed out on Jessica Paz, one of the sound designers of “Hadestown,” becoming not only the first woman nominated in her category but the first to win, and Sergio Trujillo, the choreographer of “Ain’t Too Proud,” getting a standing ovation when he recalled coming to America as an undocumented immigrant and issued a promise to Dreamers that “change will come.”

Not that the broadcast was short on inspirational moments. André De Shields, the velvet cobra who won for playing Hermes in “Hadestown,” shared wisdom from his “seventy-three years on the Earth plane.” Mart Crowley, who has had eighty-three years on the Earth plane, and who wrote the pre-Stonewall drama “The Boys in the Band,” which won for Revival of a Play, acknowledged the original 1968 cast: “Nine brave men who did not listen to their agents when they were told their careers would be finished.” Bryan Cranston, who won for playing Howard Beale in “Network,” dedicated his award to the press, saying, “The media is not the enemy of the people. Demagoguery is the enemy of the people.” (Thanks!) And Ali Stroker, the incandescent performer in a wheelchair who plays Ado Annie in “Oklahoma!” (which won the award for Revival of a Musical), not only got to sing her sexy, Dolly Parton-esque rendition of “I Cain’t Say No” but then returned to accept a Tony. She said, “This award is for every kid who is watching tonight who has a disability, who has a limitation or a challenge, who has been waiting to see themselves represented in this arena. You are.”

Finally, honorable mention must go to Billy Porter, who is currently both king and queen of the red carpet, having aced the Academy Awards and the Met Gala. He did not disappoint at the Tonys, to which he wore a red and pink gown made from the curtain of the Al Hirschfeld Theatre, where he gave his Tony-winning performance in “Kinky Boots,” in 2013. Let’s hope this starts a trend in sustainable fashion. Maybe next year Cher will show up wearing King Kong as a stole.

Click Here: kanken mini cheap

A Gay Russian, Exiled in Ireland

June 11, 2019 | News | No Comments

Listen with:

Click Here: fjallraven kanken backpack

  • iTunes
  • WNYC
  • Stitcher
  • TuneIn

Evgeny Shtorn and Alexander Kondakov were living together in St. Petersburg when Vladimir Putin began his crackdown on the L.G.B.T.Q. movement in Russia, passing laws that prohibited gay “propaganda.” Kondakov is a scholar of the movement, and Shtorn has studied the sociology of hate crimes against gay men. The couple also worked for an N.G.O. that received foreign funding, which made them appear particularly suspicious to Russian authorities. After Shtorn’s citizenship was rescinded, he became vulnerable to pressure from the F.S.B., the Russian security agency, which tried to make him an informant. Finally, Shtorn decided to flee, seeking refuge as a stateless person in Ireland, where Masha Gessen spoke with him. Gessen says that Putin’s recent targeting of L.G.B.T.Q. people is perfectly in line with his methods. “[We] make the perfect scapegoat, because we stand in for everything,” she says. “We stand in for the West. We stand in all the things that have changed in the last quarter century that make you uncomfortable. And, of course, no Russian thinks they’ve ever met a gay person in person—so that makes it really easy to create that image of ‘the villainous queer people.’ ”

Share

10th Jun 2019

I have seven children. Everyone is surprised when I tell them. And people always ask if everyone in my family has a lot of children. I don’t think it’s genetic. I only have one sister, who’s currently pregnant. My dad has six brothers and sisters and my aunt has eight children, though. But really, I think it’s about whether you enjoy having children or not.

I had my first six kids with my ex and my youngest with my current partner. I have five boys and two girls. The eldest is 12, then 11, 10, eight, seven, five and the youngest is three. I love the bond the children have. I love watching them play. They all run into school together. Inevitably you get one or two who are closer, and some are chalk and cheese – they’re all individuals.

I was 27, about to be 28 when I had my eldest. When I got pregnant with my second, it was literally three months later. We had a scan and we just couldn’t believe it. Our attitude was always, if it happens, it happens. I’m lucky in that I didn’t need to worry about whether I could have children or not. We did think about contraception though. I was on the mini-pill when I was breastfeeding my second, so for our third, I was more careful about everything.

The more kids you have, the less time you have. I’ve split up from the father of my first six; we had just fallen out of love. It’s different with my partner now though. We’re still in a new relationship, so I do wish we could have some time together, but I say to him, we are just having to do things backwards. Once they’re grown, we’ll have our time. They’re not children for very long.

I’m always reminding myself of how fast time goes. Because I became pregnant so quickly after I had my eldest, I never got to enjoy him as a baby. He was 11 months old when I had my second – before I knew it, we were having his first birthday party. It’s only now with my youngest that I can enjoy things like swimming lessons. You can’t just go swimming with your kids if you have more than one below a certain age.

The plan was always to go back to work, I was a teacher before having kids. My mother is the matron of a nursing home and she wanted me to take over from her too. But then I kept getting pregnant. I still hope to go back to work eventually, to be a supply teacher, something that’s flexible as I don’t have time for lots of marking or planning. I definitely feel that teaching is part of my identity and I wouldn’t want to sacrifice that part of me, but nor do I want to miss out on watching my kids grow up.

There is a tendency to hang out with other parents, but it’s good to talk about things other than children sometimes. And it’s nice to find the space to switch off for a bit. I started going to the gym to just have a minute to clear my head.

Do I remember what it was like before kids? I remember the day before I had my eldest, lying out in our garden thinking, “I can’t wait for this baby to arrive”. I think back on it all and I really value the time I had before they were born. I used to spend a lot of money on myself, I worried about my appearance a lot. When I look back now, I think what a selfish lifestyle it was to an extent. All I did was focus on myself. Now I have my children, I have to be everything to them.

I guess if my daughter came to me and said she wanted to have kids when she was 18 or something, I would want her to be aware of all the things she could do in life before becoming a mother. I don’t want her to miss out on certain life experiences, though of course, you can do things at a later point. But forging a career for yourself, getting that independence when you’re out of school, travelling. She should live a little first.

Click Here: cheap kanken backpack

I know there are some things we just can’t do with seven children. Like leaving our kids with family while we go off for a grown up holiday. There’s just too many of them. My ex seems to go all the time, but I just wouldn’t feel right doing it. They’re still so young – it will come, that freedom for me, when they’re older.

I don’t worry about things like finances, the future, all of that. I’m lucky, my parents are always there to support me, what’s going to be will be, and I just have to hope that my partner and his dad can chip in and help out too. I want to make sure my kids have everything they need. They shouldn’t miss out, just because we chose to have seven kids.