Category: Story

Home / Category: Story

The internet loves to tear things to shreds. So to absolutely no one's surprise, it jumped on Mark Zuckerberg's congressional testimony—a serious event in which the CEO of one of the world's richest companies is answering to the federal government for mistakes like user-data breaches and enabling Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election—like a choice steak. Instead of a fork and knife, though, it used its own pointy tools: memes.

Memes used to be about cats and Chuck Norris. But now, not only is a dry, two-day, multi-hour Congressional grilling session considered meme fodder, it's a veritable treasure trove of repeatable phrases and exploitable images. It wasn't entirely Social Network jokes, but those did abound.

No one was safe: not Zuckerberg, and certainly not the octogenarian Senators doing their best to understand the Facebook. A question about websites' business models has become iconic. Pro-Trump online personalities Diamond and Silk have been catapulted onto the national stage. It's been a time to reflect on just how strange our world has gotten. So we gathered up the wildest Zuckberg testimony memes the internet has to offer. And no, we still can't really believe this is happening either. And we know one wide-eyed, besuited Harvard alum who probably feels the same way.

What the Zuck

This isn’t Mark Zuckerberg’s first go-round in the meme machine. Zuck Memes were already an established format with a dedicated subreddit. They’re almost too easy: Take one of Zuck’s stilted public Facebook posts, and re-caption it with the awkwardness dialed all the way up. But while some of this week's memes were similarly dada genius …

… many others were pure schadenfreude:

Senators and Censorship

Zuckerberg wasn't the only one to have his foibles under the internet's microscope. Did you really think aspiring roastmasters would pass up the chance to troll Senator Ted Cruz, whom they allege is the Zodiac Killer?

Or to take some swipes at stodgy, not-quite-tech-savvy Senators?

By far the best baby-boomer blunder though, was Senator Orrin Hatch's, who wondered how Facebook could "sustain a business model in which users don't pay for your service?" Zuckerberg's response—"Senator, we run ads"—quickly became a headline, and, of course, a meme.

(Because the meme-to-merch pipeline now flows faster than ever, there is of course a T-shirt.)

Maybe the oddest part of the Zuckerberg testimony's digital carnival was the rise of Lynette Hardaway and Rochelle Richardson, better known as pro-Trump Facebook personalities Diamond and Silk. Their outspoken support of President Trump has earned them over a million followers (including Trump himself), but soon found the social media platform limiting their post's spread. When they asked the company why, they say they received this message: “The Policy team has came to the conclusion that your content and your brand has been determined unsafe to the community. This decision is final and it is not appeal-able in any way.” Which would have been that, except that Ted Cruz cited the pair as an example of Facebook's tendency to censor conservative commentators.

Zuckerberg denied censorship, but acknowledged the concern and said Diamond and Silk were victims of an "enforcement error" he was already working to correct. Still, that's plenty of ammunition for a new wave of memes. Especially since there were visual aids.

But somehow, despite grilling him like a flank steak, the internet came to feel for Zuck. Or at least, find a way to see him as metaphor for the absurdity of our digital lives:

As well as the tension between the tech world and aging lawmakers trying to bring order to a situation they don't seem to fully understand.

So while we might shake our heads at this absolutely bananas state of affairs in internet culture, it's probably better to think of it this way: To understand this week's hottest memes, you have to have tuned into hours of Senators and a globally influential CEO talk the finer points of the attention economy and internet security policy. That may not be the same thing as high voter turnout, but it's still pretty encouraging. Today, memes; tomorrow, perhaps, genuine civic engagement!

Related Video

Business

Mark Zuckerberg House Testimony Highlights

Highlights from Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's appearance before the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

The Ultimate Toxic Fandom Lives in Trumpworld

March 20, 2019 | Story | No Comments

Lately, in considering the erosion of America, the image that first comes to mind is Mariah Carey's now-iconic "I don’t know her" GIF. The gleeful shake of Carey's head. The subtle mischief of her utterance. The animation frames our current moment with dead-on precision. In fairness, from its earliest days, America has never looked like we knew it could. Which is to say, America—a country of sharp contradictions and tangible evils—has never lived up to what it could be. Since the run-up to the 2016 presidential election, we have encountered grotesqueries that have further marred the country beyond recognition. Who is she? How did we get here?

One way to characterize all the recent chaos is to understand that Donald Trump's rise and reign was, and continues to be, anchored by an acutely corrosive variety of fandom. This is not your typical fandom; not like the ones we normally discuss here. It is much more pernicious than anarchic XXXtentacion fans or Elon Musk’s army of bros. Trump's ilk falls into the most harmful category of fandom—men and women who, explicitly or implicitly, uphold the structures of white supremacy. His supporters vary in texture and intent, and it would be inaccurate to paint Trump's base in one broad sweep, but there is a considerable portion of white supremacists who very seriously subscribe to, and fuel, his vile thoughts. As I've previously pointed out, to view the world through a white supremacist lens is to exist as an antithesis to progress. Trump's is a gospel of negation: At best, it is to live in the complicity of false equivalences, to shroud one's scope in unsafe fabrications like "alt-left," and to willfully color malice as virtue.

Related Stories

The malice is all around. Such fervent investment, when it moves beyond the fictionalized territories of TV or gaming that many fanbases rally around, becomes much more fraught with real-world risk. Consider the bloody indignation that arose from Charlottesville. Or Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement. Or the implementation of a travel ban on some Muslim-majority countries, which the Supreme Court upheld, even if narrowly. Or the cancellation of the Trans-Pacific partnership. His never-ending demonization of the free press, his constant Twitter attacks on figures both private and public, the erection of internment camps near the US-Mexico border, where children and babies were cruelly ripped from their parents. All of it—all of it— is stoked by Trump true believers.

The micro- and macro-dramas of the Trump era are nothing if not undying and brattish, the outbursts of spoiled children who choose defiance even when they know its costs to be perilous. Matters are only made worse by the extreme fandom that surrounds and emboldens Trump, a congregation ever ready to spew tales of conservative victimhood: spineless Republican legislators who back destructive policy; TV pundits like Sean Hannity skilled in the dark arts of media distortion; supporters who believe division, fear, and racial persecution are ingredients needed to Make America Great Again (according to one scholar, whiteness sources power through narratives of self-victimization).

Among the list of calamities, last week's press conference in Helsinki and its aftermath registers among the most grave. In one of the most shocking public testimonies ever to be given by a president, Trump sided with Vladimir Putin and denied reports of Russian interference in US elections. (At first blush, it made sense for Trump to do so; an admission of foreign meddling would imply that he unfairly won the presidential election against Hillary Clinton.) The backlash was immediate and swift. Politicians and citizens called treason. Former President Barack Obama, during a speech in Johannesburg, cautioned that the denial of facts would help undo democracy as we know it. Trump's response? Inviting Putin to the US this fall—just in time to watch the midterm elections.

With perfect timing, The Onion responded with an article titled: "Supporters Praise Trump For Upholding Traditional American Value of Supporting Murderous Dictators For Political Gain." But the headline was terrifyingly close to the echo chamber in which Trump fandom thrives. On Fox News, host Tucker Carlson said that Mexico was, in fact, doing more to tamper with US elections than Russia by "packing our electorate." Representative Warren Davidson of Ohio thought Trump's meeting with Putin was helpful in strengthening foreign ties. "I think it's always patriotic to pursue peace," he said. "Trump went out of his way to pull Russia into the community of nations." The claim was backed by Ohio representative Jim Jordan, who said of his constituents: "People are pretty darned pleased." In its most disorienting state, this is how Trump fandom works—it endows one with blind faith so poisonous all they understand are dysmorphic ideas like "Muslims are bad!" or "Women should not have a right to their bodies."

As it turns out, all fandoms, even those in Trump's club, have certain limits. The following day, under internal pressure from chief of staff John Kelly and close allies, Trump amended his initial remarks. The distance he attempted to carve out between himself and Putin, however, was pure illusion. When asked, he refused to answer where his faith lay: in the Russian president or in his own intelligence officials. "I have confidence in both parties," he told the press.

But the fact of fandom is that fans can never completely break from their roles. A source close to the White House told BuzzFeed News that there is no ceiling to what Trump can do or say: "Long-term there is no such thing as a last straw. When he's back talking about the Supreme Court or regulations, they will be back publicly supporting him." There were also several GOP lawmakers who disagreed with the president—Marco Rubio, Bob Corker, Rand Paul, and Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell, among them—all of whom released statements denouncing Russia, the bulk of which avoided criticism of Trump head-on. Fandom, of course, is not a neat science. But it does obey a reliable logic: surrender. A surrender to one's morals, to actuality, to simple reason—all in the name of a person, an entity, some higher power.

These are indeed strange times. What's turned out to be one of the strangest aspects of Trump fandom is how it curdles in online ports. Aside from out-and-out white supremacists, Trump supporters include internet trolls who use white supremacist language and dog whistles to whip up a slice of his base. There are the legislators who kowtow to Trump out of pure fear of losing their power or facing the wrath of a constituency they might not understand. There is the anti-Hillary, anti-establishment contingent who merely wanted "something new" in Washington. And there are the sort of half-fans who blindly champion Republican values no matter what, voting for leaders regardless of what evils they incite.

All these fans are far more interconnected now thanks to Twitter, the president's preferred megaphone. The once disaggregated network is now bound together, creating a thorny gordian knot. If fandom subsumes, Trump's is one that has pulled in all manner of subgroups with varied agendas, which is the exact opposite of positive fandom, where a group collectively comes together for a greater good to celebrate something bigger than themselves. Trump fans celebrate Trump, only this time that celebration is leading to national decay.

But that is the thing with fandom—it's laced with disappointment. Think of storied sports franchises like the Lakers or Knicks. To love just about any genre show is to resign oneself to heartbreak, whether due to untimely death (cancellation) or qualitative decline. To their own disappointment, fans may soon realize that the man they elected to transform the country for the better instead accomplished the very opposite. Only, by then, it will be too late.

Music written by teams, David Byrne once wrote, is arguably more accessible than that written by a sole composer. Collaborations, he mused, may result in more "universal" sentiments. But what if your partner isn’t human at all, but artificial intelligence? Now music producers are enlisting AI to crank out hits.

Style Counsel

Created by Sony’s Computer Science Laboratories, Flow Machines analyzes tracks from around the world, then suggests scores that artists—including electropop musician ALB and jazz vocalist Camille Bertault—interpret into songs. For its debut album, Hello World, the AI also surveyed syllables and words from existing music to create original (albeit gibberish) vocals.
Recommended track: The Beatles-­inspired "Daddy’s Car"

Mood Music

Jukedeck was originally developed to compose background tracks for user-­generated videos; now it’s being adopted by K-pop stars like Kim Bo-hyung and Highteen. Using deep neural networks, the AI predicts note sequences to compose brand new songs. After users select parameters such as mood, genre, and beats per minute, the AI cranks out a track that artists can embellish.
Recommended track: Highteen’s ultra-­processed hit "Digital Love"

LEARN MORE

The WIRED Guide to Artificial Intelligence

Classical Decomposer

The Artificial Intelligence Virtual Artist, aka Aiva, combs through the works of composers such as Bach, Beethoven, and Mozart and uses
the principles of music theory to make predictions and generate musical models. The program, developed by computer scientist Pierre ­Barreau, reconfigures those models into an original piece and arranges new sheet music.
Recommended track: "Among the Stars," in the style of composer John Williams

Mix Master

Landr automates the audio mastering process in minutes. The AI compares nearly finished tracks to a database of 7 million already mastered singles and tweaks each song based on previous adjustments. By processing the tracks as a batch, Landr hones a unified sound.
Recommended track: R&B single "Your World," produced by Kosine

Beats by Watson

YouTube personality Taryn Southern used IBM’s Watson to make her debut album, I AM AI. Watson Beat studies patterns among keys and rhythms
in 20-second clips of existing songs, then translates its findings into new tracks. Artists can use the open source application to layer their own instrumentals on top of the AI composite.
Recommended track: Southern’s synth-pop track "New World"

More Great WIRED Stories


This article appears in the May issue. Subscribe now.

Related Video

Culture

The M Machine's iPad-Controlled 'M' Machine

San Francisco electronic group The M Machine built a giant illuminated "M" to sit on stage while they play. The "M" is controlled by a laptop and iPad during shows.

Click:心理治疗

2017 was an incredible year for videogames—a mixed bag of genre, style, and mood. The best titles ranged from sweeping adventures to tense shooters to meditations on the existential burden of life. Some of the games released this year will go on to be lauded as the most important, profound videogames of this generation. If you don't know how to dive into videogames in the coming days, here is where to start.

10. Lone Echo

Virtual reality's great promise has always been that of escape, and nowhere has that been put to better use than in Ready At Dawn's captivating, compelling space adventure. Half puzzle-heavy exploration, half zero-G playground, Lone Echo delivers what traditional gaming cannot: a truly embodied adventure. Most of that is due to an ingenious locomotion mechanic, which eschews the all-but-default teleportation to lets you move through the game via combination of thrusters and pushing off solid surfaces. The disc-golf-in-space multiplayer companion, Echo Arena, has become a fan favorite, but it's Lone Echo that will be remembered as a singular, medium-defining game.

System: Oculus Rift

9. Everything

You might begin life as a polar bear. Or a kangaroo. Or a twig. Maybe a mitochondria. Then you might grow and reach with your mind and perception until you're a galaxy, or the sun, or the magic of consciousness itself. In David O'Reilly's meditative masterpiece, you can be, literally, everything. Everything derives power from a logic of interconnectedness, weaving a philosophical fable about the nature of objects while teaching the player a mechanical dance that surprises and stir. You ever wondered what the world looked like from the perspective of a soda can? Now's the time to find out.

System: PlayStation 4, Microsoft Windows

8. Resident Evil 7

In Resident Evil 7, you open doors by pressing into them, face first. It's a neat little metaphor: the act of moving forward is an act of dogged, perhaps irrational, persistence. In this brilliant revival of one of gaming's originary survival horror franchises, it's the sort of subtle touch that goes a long way. And Resident Evil 7 is full of subtle touches: the scattered trash in the derelict rural manor your hero is trapped in; the unsettling, flowing, almost oil-y design of the game's monsters; the way videotapes are used to create a hallucinatory alternate reality experience while also playing with found footage horror tropes. Resident Evil 7 is two-thirds a brilliant horror adventure, and one-third a solid action game. It'll undoubtedly be frustrating when the horror starts to run dry, but every step taken on the way is more than worth it, if you have the courage to get that far. Play in VR at your own risk.

System: PlayStation 4, PlayStation VR, Xbox One, Microsoft Windows

7. Yakuza 0

Taking place in Tokyo's Red Lights District during the late 80s and early 90s, Yakuza 0 is one of the most riveting, carefully crafted dramas ever put in front of a videogame controller. It's also a game where one of your main characters uses Street Fighter moves and random objects on the street to fight vengeful clowns. Yakuza 0 manages an impossible alchemy, merging a self-serious crime drama largely about real estate with some of the goofiest and off-beat supporting material the creators at Sega could come up with. It feels, on the whole, like a love letter to what videogames are capable of. Games are places where powerful, fascinating drama can happen. They're also places where a giant dude named Mr. Shakedown will chase you through the streets of Tokyo and try to steal your cash until you learn how to beat him up with a baseball bat. Yakuza 0 sees the dissonance, and it loves it. And you'll love it, too.

System: PlayStation 4

6. Splatoon 2

Splatoon 2 is the rare multiplayer shooter that has the power to reach beyond the core "gamer" marketplace that those games usually cater to. Part of that is the platform: the Nintendo Switch is a console built for people who hate the nonsense of modern videogame consoles, and that gives any game on it an allure it might not otherwise have. But more than that, it's in the design. The squid-kid world of Splatoon is bright and playful, awash in colorful ink, aquatic pop stars, and Harajuku high fashion. And cleverly, the designers use this aesthetic to create a shooter that actually doesn't employ violence at all. Victory is a matter of covering as many surfaces and enemies with ink as possible. Nobody gets hurt. Splatoon 2 is a marginal refinement of the original game, and that might make it less compelling for returning players, but the core of the experience remains so solid and wholesome that not changing enough can hardly be considered a flaw.

System: Nintendo Switch

5. Hellblade: Senua's Sacrifice

Hellblade: Senua's Sacrifice is a controversial game, largely because of a single page of text that appears before the experience even begins, claiming that Hellblade is a story about mental illness, specifically psychosis, and that care has been taken to make that representation thoughtful and accurate. Whether or not that's true, or to what extent telling that kind of story is appropriate in a game mostly about obscure puzzles and hack-and-slash combat, is a question worth debating. But Hellblade is, at its heart, a game that rises above those conversations, and above the sum of its own components. The story of Senua, a warrior journeying into the land of death in search of her lost love, is an uncanny screaming death knell of pain and perseverance. It's held together by the brilliant work of Melina Juergens, whose motion capture and vocal acting as Senua is possibly the best performance in the entire medium. Hellblade is flawed, sometimes monotonous and sometimes infuriating, but it's unlike anything else I've played this year, and its imagery and sound will stay with me for a long, long time.

System: PlayStation 4, Microsoft Windows

4. Super Mario Odyssey

At its best moments, Nintendo's flagship Mario title for the Nintendo Switch feels like Super Mario at his best. His most surreal, his most silly, his most unpretentiously fun. Operating out of an effortless dream logic, Super Mario Odyssey is the story of Mario Mario (that's his real name, I swear) travelling across the multiverse to crash a wedding party with the help of his friend, a cap that has the power to possess anything in the world that doesn't have its own hat. The cap's name is Cappy. This premise doesn't require you to understand or accept it. You just have to follow it, jumping, flipping, and wah-wah-wah-hoo-ing to whatever unlikely, unpredictable turn it offers next. If it had Luigi, and left some of its insensitive cultural tendencies behind (Mario, take off that sombrero, please), Super Mario Odyssey would be perfect.

System: Nintendo Switch

3. PlayerUnknown Battlegrounds

I have spent roughly half my time with PlayerUnknown Battlegrounds hiding in a shed. Surprisingly, that's not a complaint. PlayerUnknown Battlegrounds has a simple premise, one with surprising power. Take a large map, a derelict Eastern European city, perhaps. Fill it with a hundred players. Litter weapons around, some vehicles, some traps for funsies. Last player alive wins. This straightforward idea, literally cribbed from a movie, imbues every single moment of Battlegrounds with tension. Every movement in the grass, every shadow out of the corner of your eye, could be one of 99 other players with you in the crosshairs. Under that kind of scrutiny, every single microdecision becomes terrifying. Which is how I find myself hiding in a shed, over and over and over again, aiming a shotgun at a door that may never open. But let me tell you: hiding has never been so riveting.

System: Xbox One, Microsoft Windows

2. The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

The commanding image of Breath of the Wild is a sweeping vista. Encountered roughly five minutes into the game, this vista–a wide shot of a whole continent's worth of wilderness, open and ready to be explored–is a promise. Lots of videogames offer this promise, of freedom, of unfettered and truly organic exploration, but most fail. So many game worlds feel empty, and dead, and basically constructed. Which, in a very real sense, they all inevitably are. But some special games have enough of their creators in them that their worlds feel real, and beautiful, and are able to pass off the illusion that you're not just running through handcrafted levels but through a full, living place. Breath of the Wild is one of those games, and it uses such a place to deconstruct and resurrect the mythology and ideas of The Legend of Zelda, a game that was originally very simple: a story of a boy, and a big, scary place, and the promise of someone he loves at the end of the journey. No sequel in this series' thirty years has so captured the elegance and joy of that story. And now it's hard to imagine how any other game after it could.

System: Nintendo Switch

1. Nier: Automata

WIRED made one significant mistake with its gaming coverage in 2017: we never reviewed Nier: Automata. This is my fault. I came to the game a month or two late, and there was no room for coverage in our calendar. And yet Nier: Automata is so excellent, such a significant contribution to the medium of gaming and to my own life that I cannot in good conscience place any other game in the #1 spot. It's the story of two androids caught in an ancient, horrible war, but that explanation doesn't do Nier: Automata justice. It is a genre-hopping, brilliantly written, intricately crafted magnum opus about persistence, and love, and hope in the face of absolute loss. Game director Yoko Taro has famously said he makes "weird games for weird people," but Nier: Automata might be for everyone.

System: PlayStation 4, Microsoft Windows

Related Video

Gaming

Video Game Sounds Explained By Experts

Four video game sound designers explain the thinking behind some of the world's most recognizable video game sounds.

David Cage scoffs at the notion that videogames are fun. “They should trouble you, move you, make you react,” he says. As founder of the studio Quantic Dream, the French developer has been stunning and confounding players for two decades with cinematic games that tackle heady issues of love, death, domestic abuse, oppression, and the afterlife. “Some people are shocked when a game evokes real-world issues,” he says. “But this platform is about becoming the characters, not just seeing them from the outside like in a film.”

Detroit: Become Human, slated for release this spring, is the auteur’s most ambitious work yet. Cage wrote the game’s 2,000-page script and employed more than 250 motion capture actors. Set in Detroit, the future capital of AI manufacturing, the plot revolves around three androids grappling with what it means to be human. Players make decisions to steer the story line; in one demo scene, an android tries to protect a young girl from her abusive father. It’s a gripping, unsettling project, one that Cage considers his most compelling.

DETROIT: BECOME HUMAN, BY THE NUMBERS

513 characters

2,000 script pages

35,000 camera shots

74,000 unique animations

5.1 million lines of code

For purists, Detroit is peak Cage, prioritizing dialogue and emotional gimmicks over gameplay. It’s a critique he considers myopic. “I disagree that injecting emotion into a game comes at the expense of the playing experience,” he says. For Cage, the future of the industry is in inciting pathos.

Whether Detroit is received as visionary or exhibitionist, Cage is confident developers will soon embrace the potential of hyperrealistic interactive gaming. The question is whether we’re ready for it.


Who:
David Cage, videogame developer

Previous Titles:
Heavy Rain, Beyond: Two Souls

Favorite game:
Rick Dangerous

Favorite movie:
2001: A Space Odyssey

Notable collaborators:
David Bowie, Ellen Page, Willem Dafoe

Gaming hero:
Tekken’s Paul Phoenix. “He survived 20 years in this industry with the same haircut, which says a lot.”


This article appears in the February issue. Subscribe now.

Related Video

Gaming

The Psychology Behind Video Game Sounds (1972-1998)

Four video game sound designers explain the thinking behind some of the world's most recognizable video game sounds. Featuring sounds from Pac-Man, Sonic the Hedgehog, Donkey Kong, Mario Kart, Contra, Street Fighter II, Doom and more!

The 10 Most Difficult-to-Defend Online Fandoms

March 20, 2019 | Story | No Comments

Oh, fandom. So passionate, so partisan—and, too often these days, so prolifically peevish. From Tumblr and Wattpad to more mainstream platforms like Twitter and Instagram, online communities have served as rallying points for stan armies: obsessives who comb over every interview and shred of non-news for information about the object of their adoration. But increasingly, fandoms' emotions have been curdling into a different kind of potion; something petty, entitled, conspiratorial, even abusive. So on the occasion of San Diego Comic-Con, one of the biggest fan events in the world, it's time for some tough love.

First, a note: this is a look at toxic strains that exist within a larger fandom, not an indictment of a given artist or person. Fandom is a pure and precious thing, and no one should feel conflicted about being invested in a pop-culture figure or property. If you express that investment by being a worse person, though—treating appreciation like warfare, demanding dogmatic purity tests, attacking people, or seeing yourself as some kind of a crusader—than it's probably time to take some time and re-assess things. We're sure nothing in the following catalog sounds like anything you've done in the name of fandom, right? Enjoy Comic-Con!

10. Barbz (Nicki Minaj Fandom)

The Barbz are a fiercely loyal sort. Case in point: In April, upon the release of Invasion of Privacy, a writer for British GQ explained how Cardi B had adopted Nicki Minaj’s style in a much more accessible way. “Nicki intimidates; Cardi endears,” she wrote. Minaj disciples responded with an all-out attack. The GQ staffer was flooded with malicious tweets, ranging from the direct (“I will kill u bitch”) to even more direct (“You better to delete that before we get your address and start hunting you and your family down!!”) The following month, the Barbz turned on one of their own when a self-proclaimed fan wondered aloud on Twitter: “You know how dope it would be if Nicki put out mature content? No silly shit, just reflecting on past relationships, being a boss, hardships, etc.” (Minaj took it further and DMed a disgustingly petty reply to the fan). For Barbz, fandom doesn’t allow for dissent—even when it's not dissent but a valid, healthy appraisal. This may come as a surprise, y'all, but love and criticism are not mutually exclusive.

9. Swifties (Taylor Swift Fandom)

Generally speaking, Taylor Swift’s fans aren’t bad—they just really love Swift and tend to be a little over-the-top about it. And most of the time, that’s what fandom is. (Also, this is a pop star who sends holiday presents to them; she’s earned their devotion.) But within that group, the “Bad Blood” singer has a few bad apples. There are those who go after Hayley Kiyoko for daring to point out that she shouldn’t be criticized for singing about women when Swift sings about men all the time. (Swift actually agrees with Kiyoko on that point.) There are Swifties who get bent out of shape when she doesn’t get nominated for enough awards. And then there are the white supremacists—fans Swift seems to have done nothing to court, but pop up anyway. Yeah, the ones who call her an “Aryan goddess”? Those are the ones who give her a bad reputation.

8. Zack Snyder Fans

Look, Zack Snyder's hardcore supporters have it rough. Or, well, they think they do. They’ve hitched their wagon to a star that occasionally blinks out. He’s made some OK movies (Dawn of the Dead, Watchmen) but he’s made even more that have been trashed by critics: Sucker Punch; Man of Steel; Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. That's led to a persecution complex among more than a few of his stans. While this kerfuffle has died down a bit with Snyder's step back from the spotlight—recently, he has shifted focus to make iPhone movies and produce the DC movies rather than direct them—the coming years represent a reckoning. James Wan’s Aquaman and Patty Jenkins' Wonder Woman sequel are headed to theaters, and the receptions they get may determine whether critics have complaints with all DC movies, or just the ones with Snyder behind the camera. In the meantime, though, his own personal justice league will be there to defend it.

7. Rick and Morty Fans

Yes, Dan Harmon and Justin Roiland created a funny, smart, challenging (god, those burps) cartoon. Yes, it delivers a bizarro Back to the Future ride through both spacetime and genre tropes. Yes, it's the most STEM-conscious animated show since Futurama. But sweet tapdancing Pickle Rick, you've never seen a TV fandom more noisome than this one. There's the "this show is so smart normies don't get it" self-congratulation that's so over-the-top it became a copypasta meme; there's the propensity to doxx the show's female writers and generally be such venal stains that Harmon despises them; there's the mass freakout after McDonald's ran out of limited-edition Szechuan dipping sauce. (Yes, that's correct.) While Adult Swim recently renewed the show for 70 new episodes, there's going to be quite a lull before anyone sees a new episode—here's hoping the fans grow up a little bit in the meantime.

6. #TeamBreezy (Chris Brown Fandom)

It’s been almost a decade since reports first surfaced of Chris Brown’s violent abuse of then-girlfriend Rihanna. Since then, Rihanna has rocketed to pop superstardom while Brown’s career has strided along, aided by a loyal following that borders on enablers. Despite an earnest-seeming redemption tour, reports of Brown’s violent behavior continue to bubble up: Brown’s ex-girlfriend filed for a restraining order; Brown went on a homophobic Twitter rant; Brown punched a fan in a nightclub; Brown locked a woman in his home, without a cell phone, so she could be sexually assaulted. (Brown’s camp denies that last accusation.) Yet, Team Breezy generally attributes such reports to misinformation and "haters." Fandoms are built on stand-by-your-man loyalty, but at some point it becomes impossible to love the art in good conscience. If the #MeToo movement is any indication, the times have changed since Rihanna’s bloody face headlined gossip sites. Willful ignorance is no longer an acceptable choice.

5. XXXtentacion Fans

On June 18, outside of a Broward County motorcycle dealership, 20-year-old Jahseh Onfroy was fatally gunned down by two assailants. At the time of his death, Onfroy, who rapped under the moniker XXXTentacion, had already amassed a rare kind of fame: He attracted deep love and even deeper hate with a ferocious mania. The allure of Onfroy’s dark matter inspired the type of fandom that spills into violent obsession. A recurring source of vitriol for the rapper, and an easy target for his rabid fanbase, was his ex-girlfriend, Geneva Ayala, who filed multiple charges against the rapper (including aggravated battery of a pregnant woman, domestic battery by strangulation, and witness tampering). When it came to light that Ayala created a GoFundMe campaign to raise money for hospital bills due to damage inflicted by Onfroy, his fans bullied her into exile: forcing her to delete Instagram, hacking her Twitter account, harassing her at work to the point that she was left with no option but to quit, and shutting down her GoFundMe (it was later reopened). Having made a name for himself on Soundcloud, where he often engaged issues of mental health in his music, Onfroy willingly embraced his demons (he once called himself “lil dylan roof” on Twitter, referencing the Charleston shooter who murdered nine parishioners in South Carolina in 2015). But even now, in death, XXX is a reminder that extreme fandom has the power to blind people to the blood on their own hands.

4. Logang (Logan Paul Fandom)

Let’s get this out of the way up front. Many, even most, of Logan Paul’s fans are literal children. And so if you ask us who is really responsible for their bad behavior, we’re going to have to say the fault is predominantly with Paul and, you know, other adults. But the Logang (or the Logangsters, depending on who you ask), like Lil Tay, are inventing a new category of internet villain: the terrifying baby troll. They do all the things adult trolls do—parrot back the sexist and racist things Pauls says, stalk him outside hotel rooms, and harass and troll the “haters” daring to criticize their deeply problematic idol—but they’re kids! So you can’t really fire back at them without being a jerk yourself. Listen, Logang: all Logan wants to do is sell you merch. He’s not really your friend. Can I interest you in a puppy video?

3. Bro Army (Pewdiepie Fandom)

First rule of non-toxic fandoms: Don’t call yourselves "bro," don’t call yourselves an "army," and definitely don’t call yourselves the Bro Army. People might assume you’re a bunch of flame-war-loving trolls who think girls are icky—and where YouTuber PewDiePie’s fans are concerned, everyone would be absolutely right. It’s not just that they’ve stuck with the Swedish gamer/alleged comedian as he peppered his videos with racial slurs, rape jokes, anti-Semitism, and homophobia for nearly a decade (though that’s bad enough). It’s also that they insist that PewDiePie somehow isn’t being hateful at all. Oh, and if you quote their hero back at them, they’ll wallpaper your social media accounts with thoughtful messages about how you suck—for years.

2. The Dark Side of Star Wars Fandom

The most recent eruption has been a hilariously non-ironic campaign to remake The Last Jedi, but that's sadly just the latest in a long line of online grossness from the entitled Sith-heads who are so keen on reclaiming the Star Wars universe . Somehow, Gamergate has come to a galaxy far, far away; hectoring, harassment, even death threats aimed at director Rian Johnson. To be clear, this is a tiny (if vocal) subset of Star Wars fandom, which on the whole is as joyous and inclusive as the universe is finally becoming. But to to quote our own Adam Rogers:

"Everyone has a right to opinions about movies. Everyone has a right, I guess, to throw those opinions in the face of the people who make those movies, though it does seem at minimum impolite. Everyone has the right to ask transnational entertainment companies to make the movies they want, and if those companies don’t respond, to stop giving the companies money. But harassment, threats, jokes about someone’s race or gender? A Jedi would fight someone who did that stuff. The Force binds us all together. Hatred and anger are the ways of the Dark Side; they may bring power, but at a cost. It harms individuals, debases the people who do it, and it breaks the Fellowship. In the end, the cost of that power will be powerlessness."

1. Elon Musk Acolytes

"Always punch up" is a good life motto. You’ll accomplish a lot by speaking truth to power; dissecting the misdeeds of a relative unknown, though, makes you look like a tool. That’s why, despite the plethora of dark and toxic fandoms that flourish on the fringes of the internet, the group that tops our list of nasties is devoted to a person at the internet's very center: Elon Musk. To his fan club, Musk is so much more than a charismatic artist, a talented musician, or, hey, a flawed but successful tech entrepreneur—he’s a messiah, a vestige of an age of retrograde masculinity, when a reasonably successful man could expect his ideas to remain unchecked and his words be read as gospel. And Musk wields his one-man metaphor status (and his 22.3 million follower army) to whack out any dissenting opinions. “Because before he commented on my tweet, it was floundering in relative obscurity,” science writer Erin Biba wrote in a piece for the Daily Beast. But after Musk’s dismissive response, Biba found herself drowning in hate mail and abuse. By letting his mob pick over opinions he does not like, Musk is able to control the narrative, playing up investigative reporting on Tesla’s poor labor practices as a misinformation campaign—or even, in some recent deleted tweets, insinuating that one of the people involved with the Thai cave rescue efforts is a pedophile. It’s bad to be thin-skinned, and terrible to play the underdog, but playing it while you ignite a million-man bullying campaign is reprehensible.

Ever since news broke of Cambridge Analytica’s harvesting and misuse of Facebook user data, numerous politicians, technologists, and everyday people have offered opinions on how best to respond. Many have suggested users leave the platform; others have called for government regulation. Still more have advised on ways users should lock down their privacy settings and delete content. While I’m sympathetic to all of the above suggestions—and I have even deleted my account, at least for now—there are more effective steps users can take to protect their data and privacy. It just means breaking the rules a bit.

WIRED Opinion

About

Lil Miss Hot Mess (@LilMissHotMess) is a drag queen by night and a PhD student in media studies by day. She cofounded the #MyNameIs campaign, reads to children as part of Drag Queen Story Hour, and has performed on Saturday Night Live with Katy Perry.

Some backstory: I’m one of the drag queens who protested Facebook a few years ago after several of us were booted from the platform for having names on our profiles that didn’t match our driver’s licenses.

But while the protest started with drag performers, we quickly learned that the impact of Facebook’s real names policy went far beyond our community: We received emails from LGBTQ people, domestic violence survivors, Native Americans, political activists, professionals who worked in healthcare or the criminal justice system, and many more who used non-legal names as a means of better expressing their identities or ensuring their safety.

For many, Facebook was a lifeline, a means of connecting with communities or resources they couldn’t otherwise find close to home. But unfortunately, while Facebook offered some cosmetic improvements following our protest, it still retained the policy.

After reports of Russian interference with US and other elections and the recent Cambridge Analytica scandal, many have asked me whether I have regrets about advocating against the real names policy. My answer is a firm no.

Many believe that Facebook’s policy is a safeguard against bad actors who might hide behind a fake moniker to cyberbully or harass people. However, I (and many others) have always argued that using a chosen name is not inherently deceitful and the benefits of being able to self-identify outweigh the costs. Moreover, bad behavior should be prohibited and punished on the grounds that its intent and impacts are harmful—not because of the name someone uses while doing it.

In fact, I would argue that in our current political and media climate, all users should take a cue from drag queens and employ pseudonyms and find creative ways of obfuscating or confusing companies’ data. Yes, these tactics may violate Facebook’s terms of service, but the platform (like many social media services) offers limited tools for controlling what information is accessible—your name, photo, location, and networks are always public—and how that data is used. And its recent updates are more of a redesign than a rethinking.

Below are a handful of tactics everyone can use to pollute their own data and protect their privacy.

Change Your Name: Using a chosen name allows you a bit more control over how your data is collected, stored, and used. By adopting a chosen name, it’s possible to stay in touch with friends who can decode who you really are, while avoiding exes, clients, and colleagues, or bad actors who you’d rather not be able to find you. Plus, using a different name on different platforms makes it just a bit harder for trackers to connect the dots between your accounts, activity, and behaviors. But, as those of us who’ve struggled with this policy know, it’s not always easy to change your name; you may have better luck starting with a new account or using a name that sounds “normal” to an American ear.

Related Stories

“Like” Like Everyone’s Watching: Another easy way to make it more difficult for companies to paint a clear picture of you is to give them false, misleading, or simply too much information. For example, if you don’t want to be targeted by manipulative political ads, perhaps try “liking” some pages or politicians who don’t fully match your values; the same goes for favorite brands, places, celebrities, or anything else you can support. Think of this as throwing the company off the scent. Similarly, try “liking” every post or comment you come across, or reacting with “wow” or “sad” when you don’t really mean to. You can also use Ben Grosser’s Go Rando browser extension, which automatically randomizes your reactions whenever you click “like.”

Tag Photos Incorrectly: Similarly, try mis-tagging photos of friends—or use photos of celebrities, cartoons, or inanimate objects—to confuse Facebook’s facial recognition and computer vision algorithms. We’ve probably all seen Facebook mess up in its own suggestions (that happens all the time for drag queens), so let’s give them something else to laugh at.

Click All the Ads: You may also want to try clicking all the ads Facebook and other platforms deliver to you—especially the ones you’re not actually interested in. Again, this effectively hides your real interests within a sea of not-quite-real information. Also check out the browser extension AdNauseum, developed by Daniel Howe and Helen Nissenbaum, which will automate this for you.

Share Accounts: Finally, for those of us trying to curb our social media addictions, another option is to share an account with friends or family. That way, you can still make sure you don’t miss important updates or events, while making it harder to trace you personally.

Are these foolproof? Certainly not. There are still many creepy forms of high-tech tracking and big data analysis that allow social media platforms to put the pieces together, but these suggestions make the companies do the work—and ideally, force them to justify to us why they’re doing what they’re doing in the first place. Are they ethical? I think so. Until companies come clean about their motives and give us real options to present ourselves authentically, to control the flow of our data, and to opt out of particular kinds of tracking, I’d say we’re justified in taking steps to protect ourselves, even if that means stretching the truth.

Finally, will this confuse your friends? There’s no doubt about it. But that’s another thing everyone can learn from drag queens: Sometimes playing with who we are and what’s expected of us can make life a lot more interesting.

WIRED Opinion publishes pieces written by outside contributors and represents a wide range of viewpoints. Read more opinions here.

More Facebook

Related Video

Security

How to Lock Down Your Facebook Security and Privacy Settings

The only way to be truly secure on Facebook is to delete your account. But that's crazy talk! Here's how to lock down your privacy and security and bonus, keep targeted ads at bay.

Hurricanes Harvey and Irma left a hell of a mess—millions of tons of debris, much of it toxic. Houston officials said this week it will cost at least $200 million to dispose of 8 million cubic yards of storm debris. More than 100,000 homes in Houston are damaged. Irma caused billions of dollars of damage across the Caribbean and southeastern United States.

Wood, plaster, drywall, metal, oil, electronics—all of it waterlogged. Put it into unlined landfills and it can contaminate groundwater. The gypsum in drywall decomposes into hydrogen sulfide gas. And it might all get thrown away together anyway.

“No one is interested in separating garbage after a hurricane,” says Elena Craft, a senior scientist at the Environmental Defense Fund in Austin. “But there are real threats that exist from this process.”

Craft and other environmental advocates met with representatives of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality this week to talk about debris disposal. “It sounded like [the state] was relying on landfill operators to be vigilant,” Craft says. “The state does not do the best job of active surveillance. It’s nice to think that everyone is doing the right thing, but sometimes they don’t.”

Case in point: Versailles, Louisiana. After Hurricane Katrina in 2005, Louisiana state environmental officials were so overwhelmed with construction debris that they opened up a new landfill next to the low-income Vietnamese community of Versailles. The dumping continued despite protests, and years later local residents found medical waste, oil cans, and electronics—stuff that was supposed to be sent to more protective sites. Chronicled in a PBS documentary, the Versailles landfill didn’t have a synthetic liner underneath or water-monitoring equipment.

Under the Obama administration, the EPA was working on a plan to incorporate climate change scenarios into planning for disposal of toxic material and protecting Superfund sites from big storms. “Increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events may affect EPA’s capacity to manage debris and respond to emergencies,” the report stated. And last year, the Office of the Inspector General released a report that EPA officials didn’t have a good idea of what state officials were doing to prepare for post-disaster waste disposal.

A new post-hurricane analysis by the Union of Concerned Scientists shows 650 energy and industrial facilities in Texas flooded by Harvey, where toxic runoff could pose a risk to local residents.

What happens now in Florida and Texas will depend on the decisions that state officials make in the coming weeks. “What we saw during Hurricane Katrina was a lot of waivers issued by EPA and activity that was technically illegal,” says Adam Babich, professor of environmental law at Tulane University. The waivers are a legal way to allow state agencies to temporarily violate federal law without facing enforcement by the EPA.

Local officials could mix different kinds of waste without fear of prosecution for violating federal hazardous waste laws. That sometimes leads to long-term risk to nearby communities, Babich says. “Sometimes you have to do it in the face of an emergency,” he says. “Other times you are tying to do it faster than you would otherwise, or to save money. Where those lines are drawn is something we can debate.”

In Florida, state emergency officials are still working to restore power and other basic services to millions of people hit by the storm. As yet Florida officials haven't asked for a statewide waiver to allow solid waste facilities to accept waste categories outside of their permit, but they will consider waivers on a case by case basis, according to Sarah Shellabarger, a spokeswoman for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection in Tallahassee.

    More on Hurricanes

  • Adam Rogers

    Hurricane Irma: A Practically Impossible Storm

  • Aarian Marshall

    4 Maps That Show the Gigantic Hurricane Irma Evacuation

  • Aarian Marshall

    That Delta Plane Flying Straight Through Hurricane Irma Was NBD

Florida is asking residents to report storm debris to a graphic web portal that went up Friday showing reports from around the state. Marianna Huntley of Ormond Beach reported a "wrecked boat sitting upside down next to my dock leaking oil and fluids into the river" while other people reported smashed wooden piers, junked jet skis and "trees 60 to 80 feet long and as big around as car tires."

WIRED asked the EPA press office whether the agency plans to grant waivers to Texas and Florida on dumping rules, whether it has state debris response plans, and whether the agency is incorporating climate change into disaster preparedness. As of Friday afternoon, the agency had not responded.

Related Video

Science

Predicting Hurricanes in High Definition

In the decade since Hurricane Katrina, tools for tracking and modeling powerful storms have grown in sophistication and detail.

During a recent Home Run Derby, Aaron Judge did something that no one thought was possible. He took a swing and hit a ball so hard that it collided with the ceiling at Marlins Park. The ball hit the ceiling about 170 feet above the ground. The height of the ceiling had been designed by engineers so that balls wouldn't hit it—but clearly, they can.

OK, I don't really want to talk about sports. I want to talk about physics. Just how would you even calculate the height of a baseball's trajectory? I'm not just going to show you how to do it, I'm going to let you do it too.

Force and Momentum

I'm going to start with the most important physics idea needed for the trajectory of a baseball: the momentum principle. This says that the total force on an object is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum. Momentum is the product of mass and velocity; both it and the force are vectors.

If you know the forces on an object, you can find its change in momentum. With the momentum, you get the velocity and then can find the new position. That's basically how it works.

Two Forces on a Baseball

After a baseball is hit by the bat, it only has two forces on it (OK, approximately two forces. The first is the gravitational force, a downward force that depends on the mass of the object and the value of the gravitational field (g = 9.8 N/kg). The second force on the ball is a little more complicated: It's the air resistance force.

Although you don't think about it much, you've felt this air resistance force before. When you stick your hand out of a moving window or when you ride on a bike you can feel the force as you move through the air. One of the simplest models for this force uses the following equation:

That might look complicated, but it's not too bad. The ρ is the density of air (about 1.2 kg/m3 in most cases). The cross sectional area of the object is A and C is the drag coefficient that depends on the shape of the object. Finally, there is the velocity. This model says that as the velocity increases, the air resistance also increases.

But you might notice one little problem with the above expression: It's not a vector. I left that part off for simplicity, but yes—air resistance is a vector. The direction of this force is always in the direction opposite of the velocity vector.

I can find the values of all of these parameters for air drag, and the mass and size of the ball are easily found online. For this calculation, I will use a drag coefficient of 0.3.

Calculating Trajectory

Isn't this a projectile motion problem? Couldn't you just use the kinematic equations to find the range of a ball after it was hit? Actually, no. This isn't projectile motion because we are including the drag force. Projectile motion problems have an object with the only force being the gravitational force—and this would be approximately true for baseballs at low speeds. We are clearly not dealing with low-speed balls.

You can't use the kinematic equations because those assume the acceleration is constant. However, as the ball slows down or changes direction the air resistance force also changes. With this non-constant acceleration, there is really only one option: Create a numerical solution.

In a numerical solution, we essentially cheat. Since the problem is that forces are not constant, we can pretend they are constant if we take just a tiny time interval (say 0.01 seconds). During this short time, the velocity and thus the air resistance won't change too much, so I could use the kinematic equations (for constant acceleration). This constant force approximation works—but it leaves us with another problem. If I want to calculate where the ball is after 1 second, I would need to do this calculation 100 times (100 x 0.01 = 1). And this is where the computer becomes useful (but not required).

If you want to go over the details of creating a numerical calculation, take a look at this post that models the motion of a spring. Otherwise, let's just jump right into the code. Notice that you can indeed change things in the code and run it again—that's the fun part. Just click the "play" to run it and the "pencil" to edit.

This code is written in Python. That means that the number sign (or as my kids call it, the hashtag) at the beginning of line makes it a comment that is ignored by the program. I added a bunch of comments to point out things that you might want to change (like the initial velocity and the launch angle). Go ahead, change something. You won't break it.

Homework

Since I gave you the numerical calculation, I also have to give you homework.

  • Find a launch speed and angle that would produce a home run. You will need to find the home run distance for a particular park. Yes, you should probably find a way to include the height of the wall.
  • What is the minimum launch speed that would hit the rafters for Marlins Park?
  • For a given speed, what angle gives the maximum range? No, it's not 45 degrees—that's only for motion with no air resistance.
  • What would happen if you increased the density of air by just a little bit? Does it make a huge difference?
  • My calculation uses a drag coefficient of 0.3—but this is just an approximation. In fact, the drag coefficient changes with the velocity of the ball. See if you can modify the code to include a better drag coefficient. This site might be a good place to start to figure out how to change that coefficient.
  • What about the Magnus force? This is another force due to the interaction between the air and a spinning object. See if you can add that force to the numerical calculation.

Related Video

Business

The Future of the NFL Game Ball

A physics professor re-imagines the size and shape of an NFL football in an effort to optimize it for flight. It turns out a couple of small changes can add a whole lot of distance, but how would that change the way the game is played?

After much fanfare, Justice League is finally in theaters, complete with Wonder Woman, Batman, The Flash, Aquaman, and Cyborg. It’s a jam-packed two hours, but it can still leave people wanting more. For those looking to go—in the parlance of the tagline—"all in" with the film’s heroes, the DC Comics back catalogue is filled with stories that build out the mythology and ideas introduced in the movie, from Atlantis to Apokolips and beyond. With an entire comic book universe to explore, where should a new Justice League fan start? We have some suggestions.

Justice League Vol. 2 #1-6

Arguably the source material for the movie—albeit with an additional Green Lantern—the first six issues of DC's 2011 Justice League series had an impressive creative team (Geoff Johns and Jim Lee, aka DC's chief creative officer and co-publisher, respectively) and a daunting remit: Reboot the entire DC comic book universe and tell an all-new origin for the Justice League. That it manages to pull both off is more than slightly impressive.

How to read it: Available digitally and in the Justice League Vol. 1: Origin print collection.

Aquaman Vol. 8 #1-6

First, the bad news: Jason Momoa's Aquaman isn't really like any version of the Sea King from the comic books, so anyone looking for more of that guy will have to wait until next year's solo Aquaman movie. While you're waiting, however, check out the opening issues of the current Aquaman comic book series, which makes a convincing case for why Arthur Curry is a badass no matter what form he takes. (Yes, even this one.)

How to read it: Available digitally and in the Aquaman Vol. 1: The Drowning print collection.

New Gods #1-11

Wondering what Steppenwolf's whole deal is? Can’t decipher what those Mother Boxes are all about? Still can’t figure out what's going on with that teleport tube no one ever bothers to explain in the movie? Turn to the Source—that's a pun, which you'll realize once you crack open these comics. The 1970s output of Jack Kirby, the man behind the Fantastic Four, Thor, Captain America, Iron Man, Avengers, and X-Men (to name just a handful), is more stylized and out there than his Marvel work, but it's no less awesome. Also, if you read these books much, much more of Justice League will make sense. We promise.

How to read it: Available digitally, and in the upcoming Jack Kirby's Fourth World Omnibus print collection.

JLA #10-15

We won't spoil the post-credit sequence for those who haven't seen it, but those wondering where Justice League 2 might end up going would be well-served to read the "Rock of Ages" arc from the 1990s JLA series, in which the team faces two threats they didn't see coming. Spoiler alert: You'll have to deal with the fact that Superman was made out of electricity or something in this run, so get ready for a bright blue hero in a different costume than you’re used to. That said, if you can handle alternate futures, time travel, and the subjugation of the human race—all of which appear in this story—you can probably live with Kal-El looking a little weird.

How to read it: Available digitally, and in the JLA: Deluxe Edition Vol. 2 print collection.

The Flash Vol. 5 #25-32

Just as Ezra Miller's slightly nervous and lovable take on the fastest man alive, Barry Allen, is about to win new fans for the Flash, the regular DC comic featuring the character has—ahem—kicked into high gear, thanks to a showdown with his arch-nemesis that changes his powers for the worst. What happens when the Flash can no longer just run away from his problems? That's what you'll find out in these books.

How to read it: Available digitally and in print editions.


More Justice League

Related Video

Culture

Wonder Women of Comic-Con 2017

Wonder Woman is one of the biggest films of the summer, so this year's Comic-Con is filled with some great Wonder Woman cosplay. Here are the numbers behind some of the best Wonder Women at Comic-Con 2017.